Different Shades Of Professional Development Of Subject Teachers Working In Integration Classes In Academic Secondary Schools In Vienna, Austria.
Author(s):
Judith 't Gilde (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 10 C, Professional Development for Inclusive Education

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-24
15:30-17:00
Room:
W6.21
Chair:
Jo Rose

Contribution

Introduction:

Inclusion is a fairly new, challenging and sometimes confusing concept. Not only in Austria, but also in other countries of the world, it raises many discussions. Since Austria has signed and ratified the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and the Optional Protocols in 2007 and 2008 respectively, the school system is trying to head towards an inclusive education system.

Teachers play an important role in implementing inclusive education, but international and Austrian researches mention the lack of appropriate training and skills for teachers to manage inclusive classes (Feyerer et al. 2005; Pijl 2010). Pre-service as well as in-service teachers will have to be equipped with the right skills and tools in order to be able to deal with inclusive education.

The English and German literature discusses different approaches and paradigms to teachers’ professionalism (Sachs 2016; Mentor et al. 2010; Terhart 2011). The concept of the transformative teacher and the professional biographical approach put teachers at the centre and encourage them to be pro-active in shaping professionalism. This research follows the professional biographical approach, which is closely related to Bildung, Bildungsgangforschung and developmental tasks (Entwicklungsaufgaben).

Bildung is understood as a social process that allows the learner to develop him or herself through for instance crises, regressions, and developmental shifts. Meyer (2010) explains that Bildungsgangforschung contains two fundamental meanings: (1) learner development and (2) educational experience the learner has out of and in school. Therefore he translates it as research on ‘learner development and educational experience’. Kraler (2012) describes it as ‘research on the course of education’. The emphasis of Bildungsgangforschung is on the perspective of the learner (Kunze/Trautmann/Meyer 2010). Students as well as teachers are learners. Thus, teachers also have to cope with developmental tasks (Meyer 2010).

The concept of developmental tasks comes from the American sociologist and educationalist Havighurst (1972) who devised the concept of developmental stages and tasks from infant hood to old age. Hericks (2006: 92) has identified four developmental tasks which pre- and in-service teachers in their first years of teaching are confronted with: (1) The development of competence; (2) the development of the ability to mediate or transfer acquired knowledge and competence to others (3) the development of the ability to acknowledge the student’s otherness (4) the development of the ability to interact within the school system. This research aims at finding out how these developmental tasks are given shape in relation to inclusive education for subject teachers of academic secondary schools in Vienna, Austria.

Focus of the study:

Previous international studies point out that more research needs to be done in order to hear the voice of teachers and to learn from their experiences (Forlin 2012; Biewer, Böhm and Schütz 2015). This research wants to contribute to giving the teaching profession a voice in order ‘to be the author of its own identity or professional narrative’ (Sachs 2000: 159). In addition, in general and in particular in Austria, there is a need for research about teachers’ professional development in relation to inclusive education at secondary school level. Through my research I would like to find out (1) which developmental tasks subject teachers of integration classes in academic secondary schools in Vienna define in relation to inclusive education and/or integration and (2) what inclusive education means to them. This leads to the following research question: ‘In what ways does inclusive education affect processes of professionalism in teachers of academic secondary schools in Vienna, Austria?’

Method

The present study is part of a PhD research. It is a qualitative research that aims at reconstructing the developmental tasks of subject teachers working in integration classes in academic secondary schools in Vienna as well as the meaning of inclusive education for these teachers. Convenience sampling was done. In 2014, in Vienna there were four academic secondary schools with integration classes. From these four schools, three directors, twelve subject teachers, five integration teachers and one teacher who assists blind students, volunteered to participate in this research. In November-December 2014, problem based interviews were done with the participants (Witzel 2000). At the beginning of 2015, non-participant, unstructured ethnographic observations were done in the classrooms for a total of 18 hours. The observations and interviews with directors and integration teachers were used to better understand the subject teachers’ interviews and to support the reconstruction of their habitus. Then, in a second step the interviews of the subject teachers are being analysed with the documentary method following the steps as described by Nohl (2010). The documentary method aims at reconstructing a-theoretical knowledge (Bohnsack 2010; Nohl 2010). A-theoretical knowledge connects people and it is part of our routine (Nohl 2012). It can be family members, but also teachers for instance. When a group of teachers working in the same school are talking to each other, they share a ‘conjunctive space of experience’ (Przyborksi 2004): teachers simply understand each other implicitly. This research aims at reconstructing the teachers’ implicit knowledge about teaching and the challenges they encounter in the integration class and the meaning of inclusive education for them. The analysis is done by working with contrasting cases. The first and second case that have been analysed are the most contrasting ones. Presently, the third case is being interpreted. The final amount of interviews to be analysed depends on when theoretical saturation happens.

Expected Outcomes

This research allows to describe and discuss the developmental tasks of Hericks (2006) in relation to the professional development of subject teachers working in integration classes in academic secondary schools in Vienna. For now, it seems that the focus on developmental tasks is personal and different for each teacher. The two contrasting cases that have been analysed depict a very different professional development, influenced by the subject teachers’ personal biography. In the first case, circumstances forced the experienced subject teacher to start teaching in the integration class. Although she enjoys teaching, she uses teacher-centred methods, discipline is important to her and she has little contact or interest in the special needs children. She does not take or feel any responsibility for the special needs children. Rather, the integration teacher is responsible for them and is seen by the subject teacher as responsible for keeping the class disciplined. In short, for this teacher there is no professional development in relation to inclusive education. This teacher is persuaded that inclusive education has no future. In contrast, the second case is an experienced teacher who chose to work in the integration class. She uses child-centred teaching strategies. Over the years she has dealt with difficult situations in the integration class and learned from them. She values the integration teacher as an equal, knowledgeable colleague. The subject teacher’s skills overlap with those of the integration teacher. This teacher sees a future for inclusive education, but the analysis of the case also points out some limits to inclusive education in general and more specifically the subject teacher’s professional development in relation to inclusive education. A third and fourth case are presently being analysed.

References

Biewer G. Böhm E., Schütz S. (2015).Inklusive Pädagogik in der Sekundarstufe. Kohlhammer: Stuttgart. Bohnsack R. (2010). Documentary Method and Group Discussions. in Qualitative Analysis and Documentary Method in International Educational Research. ed by Bohnsack R., Pfaff N., Weller W. Germany: Barbara Budrich Publishers, 99-124. Feyerer, E., Hayward, L., Hedge, N., Ness, K. (2005). Towards an Inclusive Masters' Curriculum in Europe. Available from [12 January 2017]. Forlin, C. (2012). Responding to the need for inclusive teacher education. Rhetoric or reality? in: Future directions for inclusive teacher education. An international perspective. ed by Forlin C. New York: Routledge, p. 3-12. Havighurst, R. J. (1972). Developmental Tasks and Education. 3rd edition 1972. New York: Longmann Inc. Hericks U. (2006). Professionalisierung als Entwicklungsaufgabe. Rekonstruktionen zur Berufseingangphase von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Kraler, C. (2012). Lehramtstudierende und ihre Entwicklungsaufgaben in der universitären Ausbildungsphase. Reform der Lehrerbildung, (3) 5: 277-298. Kunze I., Trautmann M., Meyer M. (2010). Zum Stand der Bildungsgangforschung und Bildungsgangdidaktik. Rhino Didactics, 34. Meyer M. A. (2010). A view on Didactics and Instructional Planning from the Perspective of research on learner development and educational experience. Éducation et didactique, (4) 2. Menter I., Hulme M., Elliot D. and Lewin J. (2010). Literature Review on Teacher Education in the 21st Century. Scottish Government Social Research. Available from [12 January 2017]. Nohl A. (2010). Narrative Interview and Documentary Interpretation. in Qualitative Analysis and Documentary Method in International Educational Research. ed by Bohnsack R., Pfaff N., Weller W. Germany: Barbara Budrich Publishers, 195-217. Nohl A. (2012). Interviews und dokumentarische Methode. Anleitungen für die Forschungspraxis. 4. überarbeitete Auflage. Springer VS. Pijl S.J. (2010). Preparing teachers for inclusive education: some reflections from the Netherlands. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. Volume 10, number s1. Przyborski A.(2004) Gesprächsanalyse und dokumentarische Methode. Qualitative Auswertung von Gesprächen, Gruppendiskussionen und anderen Diskursen. Lehrbuch. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. Sachs J. (2000). The activist professional. Journal of Educational Change, (1) 1: 77–94. Sachs J. (2016) Teacher professionalism: why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching (22) 4: 413-425. Terhart, E. (2011). Lehrerberuf und Lehrerbildung. Forschungsbefunde, Problemanalysen, Reformkonzepte. Weinheim. Witzel, A. (2000). The Problem-Centered interview. Forum Qualitative Social Research. Vol. 1, No. 1.

Author Information

Judith 't Gilde (presenting / submitting)
University of Utrecht
Utrecht

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.