The Role Of Action Research In Reforming Special Units: Striving For Change And Improvement
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

04 SES 04 C, Action Research and Integrity in Inclusive Education

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-23
09:00-10:30
Room:
W6.21
Chair:
Fabio Dovigo

Contribution

Inclusive education is about equal opportunities in education for all children, regardless of ability (European Commission, 2010; Gallagher et al., 2003). Within this framework, a trend towards enrollment of disabled children in mainstream schools has been observed during the last few years; this is underpinned by international conventions, such as the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (United Nations, 2006; UNESCO, 2004), and initiatives, such as the European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education, that aim to inspire national legislation towards equal access to quality education (European Commission, 2010). In Cyprus most disabled children are entitled to enroll in mainstream schools, as the law 113(I)/1999 mandates (Cyprus Parliament, 1999). However, children labeled as children with severe disabilities are segregated either in special schools or special units, where they still have a fragmented curriculum, which, according to the Ministry of Education and Culture (MoEC, 2016), emphasizes socialization rather than learning (Pieridou, 2010; Phtiaka, 2006; Symeonidou, 2009).

 

Yet, segregation, coupled with a curriculum that does not aim to enable disabled children maximize their potential, seem to violate the children’s right to receive quality education alongside their peers. Moreover, when children are educated separately, they are less likely to develop partnerships and friendships (Barton & Slee, 1999; Richards & Armstrong, 2011). Therefore, special units seem to function within a contradiction: on the one hand their alleged purpose is to prompt disabled and non-disabled children integrate and intermingle; however, the inevitable segregated setting seems to create a restrictive environment and encourage separation and alienation (Ferguson, 2008; Muuya, 2002). Ironically though, in Cyprus, special education units have proliferated recently, albeit the obvious negative implications for the implementation of inclusive education and the distribution of social justice (Angelides & Michailidou, 2007; Phtiaka, 2007).

 

Thus, during the academic year 2016-17 a special unit was installed at a secondary education school in Cyprus, where one of us is currently working as an assistant head-teacher and four of us are school students. Five disabled boys aged 16-19 were enrolled at the particular special unit, each one with a different disabling condition, i.e. autism, Asperger syndrome, severe and mild mental retardation and schizophrenia. According to the law 113(1)/1999, disabled children in Cyprus special units attend a special educational program that is decided by the school head-teacher and the special education committee. The latter decide also the duration of their stay in the special unit. By the end of each academic year, disabled children in special units get a certificate of attendance which is not equal to a high-school degree. Therefore graduates from a special unit are not allowed to continue with tertiary education. Besides attending fundamental lessons such as Language, Mathematics, Music and Art, children are transferred from special units to particular workplaces twice a week to gain work experience. They are also entitled to attend lessons in mainstream classes without being graded, given that the teacher agrees (Angelides & Michailidou, 2007; Cyprus Parliament, 1999).

 

Despite some efforts of the aforementioned school to create an environment, where the above disabled children would feel welcomed and happy, the function of the particular special unit did not seem smooth. In particular, the five disabled children seemed marginalized and isolated, while some of them developed anger bursts and expressed a strong desire to leave the special unit. Based on the above observations, we tried to answer the following research questions: a) Which factors are related to the decreased well-being of the children in the special unit?  b) What changes and improvements can be done so as to facilitate inclusion?

Method

In order to answer the research questions, we decided to conduct action research, which constitutes a powerful tool for schools that may help them to make progress on school-wide priorities and meet the needs of a diverse student body (Sagor, 2000). As mentioned above, one of us is an assistant head-teacher in the secondary education school where the particular special unit is based; she is also responsible for the implementation of special education programs in that school. The other teaches inclusive education at the university. The assistant head-teacher liaised with the university teacher to begin the cycle of action research in that school. In addition, seven school students of the sociology class of that school, with the same concerns about disabled children, participated in the action research. According to Sagor (2000), involving stakeholders in action research is important because of being related to commitment and engagement in the planning process. Within this framework, we followed Sagor’s (2000) seven-step process. Thus we began with serious reflection about the topic of our research. We concluded that being happy at school is a right of every child and that we had to do something about it. The second step involved identifying the values, beliefs and theoretical perspectives we held. Thus, we decided to frame our research within the social model of disability, according to which disability is socially constructed (Oliver, 1990), and the interpretivist paradigm, which postulates that reality is constructed intersubjectively (Bryman, 2008). The next step was to identify our research questions, which have been stated above. To ensure validity and reliability, we then decided to avoid relying on a single set of data. In addition, we agreed to employ more than one research tools. In this way, we used a) observation of the children at the special unit; b) semi-structured interviews with the head-teacher, one assistant head-teacher, some teachers, the students’ board and the school caregivers that worked with the children of the special unit; c) a structured questionnaire that was delivered to the students of the school, where the special unit is based. We also made plans to analyze our quantitative data on SPSS and our qualitative data with thematic analysis. The final two steps will involve reporting our findings and taking informed action, based on the participants’ suggestions and the relevant literature. Our intervention will be evaluated and a second action research cycle will begin, based on the feedback.

Expected Outcomes

Until mid-January 2017 we managed to observe the five disabled-children (referred here with the pseudonyms Marios, Gerasimos, Yiannis, Kyriakos and Savvas) during their lessons in the special unit. We noticed that sometimes the children seemed to be bored and not interested in the material they were presented by the teachers. In addition, Kyriakos usually teased the others; moreover, when he was upset, he used to open the classroom door and run outside. Gerasimos and Yiannis kept some distance from the others and liked to be left alone. However, when the participant students intermingled with the children and participated in the lesson, we observed that Kyriakos, Marios and Savvas performed better. Moreover, we observed the five disabled-children during the school-breaks. We noticed that they were alone, seemed sad, and did not try to make friendships with the other students. However, when the participant students talked to them and prompted other students to do the same, Kyriakos, Marios and Savvas responded happily and exchanged information with the other students about their life at school and their interests, their telephone numbers and facebook. We also conducted interviews with one assistant head-teacher and three teachers of the special unit. According to them, the main barriers to inclusion encompass lack of infrastructure and equipment, inadequate teacher training and incompatibility of the disabled children’s needs. In order to dismantle the above barriers we decided to ask the school personnel, the parents’ board and MoEC for equipment. We also planned a seminar on class management and differentiated instruction for the teachers at the end of January. After gathering and analyzing the data from all the interviews and the questionnaire, we are going to plan further interventions, which will be applied and evaluated by the end of this year.

References

Angelides, P. & Michailidou, A. (2007). Exploring the Role of ‘Special Units’ in Cyprus Schools: A Case Study. International Journal of Special Education, 22(2), 86-94. Barton, L. & Slee, R. (1999). Competition, Selection and Inclusive Education: Some Observations. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3(1), 3-12. Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods (3rd edn.). Oxford: University Press. Cyprus Parliament (1999). Law About the Education of Children with Special Needs (Law 113/1999). Nicosia: Government Printing Office. [in Greek] Gallagher, D., Heshusius, L., Iano, R. P. & Skrtic, T. M. (2003). Challenging orthodoxy in special education: dissenting voices. Denver, Colorado: Love Publishing. European Commission. 2010. European Disability Strategy 2010-2020: A Renewed Commitment to a Barrier-Free Europe. Brussels: European Commission. Ferguson, D. L. (2008). International trends in inclusive education: the continuing challenge to teach each one and everyone. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 23(2), 109-120. Ministry of Education and Culture (MoEC) (2016). Special Education. Available at http://www.moec.gov.cy/eidiki_ekpaidefsi/index.html [in Greek] Muuya, J. (2002). The aims of special education schools and units in Kenya: a survey of headteachers. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(3), 229-239. Oliver, M. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Phtiaka, H. (2006). From separation to integration: parental assessment of State intervention. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 16(3), 175-189. Phtiaka, H. (2007). Special and Inclusive Education in Cyprus. Athens: Taxideftis. [in Greek] Pieridou, M. (2010). The Impact of Special Units in Mainstream Primary Schools: The case of Cyprus. In the Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the Cyprus Pedagogical Association Managing Educational Change: Research, Policy, Practice (pp. 191-203). Nicosia. [in Greek] Richards, G. & Armstrong, F. (2011). Teaching and Learning in Diverse and Inclusive Classrooms: Key Issues for New Teachers. Oxon: Routledge. Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding School Improvement with Action Research. Virginia: ASCD. Symeonidou, S. (2009). Trapped in our past: the price we have to pay for our cultural disability inheritance. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(6), 565-579. United Nations (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Available at http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml. UNESCO (2004). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Spain: UNESCO.

Author Information

Eleni Damianidou (presenting / submitting)
University of Cyprus
Education
Limassol
University of Cyprus
Nicosia
Latsia Lyceum
Latsia Lyceum
Latsia Lyceum
Latsia Lyceum

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.