Session Information
04 SES 04.5 PS, General Poster Session
General Poster Session
Contribution
This work is based on the initial questions about whether basic competences are achieved in Compulsory Secondary Education in Spain and whether an inclusive education is promoted in Secondary classrooms through the presence and participation of students. Our contribution is inserted in a Research Project that investigates the processes of educational inclusion in Secondary Education.
We start with an international framework based on the proposals of UNESCO, Education for All (2015a) and the growing interest in "inclusive education" (UNESCO y OEI, 2017).
The term Inclusive Education arises as a reform that embraces and supports diversity among all students through participation, reducing exclusion (Ainscow & Miles, 2009; UNESCO, 2005).
At European and national level, it is specified in the European Key Competences (Unión Europea, 2006), which establish the Basic Competences of Compulsory Secondary Education in Spain (LOE, 2006).
The profile of the students is diverse (repeated failures in their academic life, which has marked their work style, low self-esteem and confidence in their possibilities), which hinders their work and interest in academic tasks.
The idea arises from organizing a puppet show aimed at students of the children's cycle of their old school. In addition, this project was consistent with the idea of work to be fostered from this group, the need to link classroom learning to the students' environment, in order to promote a more comprehensive training. It is not only "learning to know" but also "learning to do", "learning to live" and "learning to be" (Delors, 1996), from education and knowledge as global common goods (UNESCO, 2015b).
We assume that the development of verbal and nonverbal communicative skills is essential for the future development of the student in the world and for the structuring of his / her thinking (Bruner, 1998).
The APS project was developed following the collaborative methodology that is usually followed in the classroom, so that the different theatrical works that were written were done in group and decisions were taken in a large group. The project was developed in different phases:
The first phase was oriented to initial motivation and documentation. Videos on children theater were visualized in class, which served to encourage students to develop the project and reflect; The evolutionary characteristics of children aged 3 to 5 years were analyzed in class; The local library was visited, where space, characters and topic or thematic thread were materialized in the library’s children’s and Young people’s literature room, starting material with which they would later elaborate the plays in the classroom.
The second phase began with the process of writing the plays. First the story was finalized and then moved on to writing in theatrical format. As the trials progressed, the texts were reworked and improved. Thus, we started an interdisciplinary work with links to the different subjects and curriculum contents of Secondary Education, but also to the interests of the student (Dewey, 1938; Dewey, 2004; Pujolàs, 2008). The basic subject was Language, but the project was extended to other subjects, which worked in a coordinated way: in Technology a puppet theater structure was built; in entrepreneurship, the virtual creation of a company of shows and animation was worked; in drawing, the puppets and backgrounds of the different scenes were designed and painted.
Finally, it was proposed to complete the proposal with a live theater and a song with choreography to involve the children. On the other hand, a dossier was made with all the students in the class and presented in the schools, where the following sections were incorporated: presentation of the project, justification, programme of the show and annex with photographic material.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Ainscow, M. & Miles, S. (2009). Developing inclusive education systems: how can we move policies forward. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester. Bruner, J. (1998). Realidad mental, mundos posibles. Barcelona: Gedisa. Buendía Eisman, L., Colás Bravo, M. P., y Hernández Pina, F. (1999). Métodos de investigación en psicopedagogía. Madrid: McGraw-Hill. Celio, C. I., Durlak, J., & Dymnicki, A. (2011). A Meta-analysis of the Impact of Service-Learning on Students. Journal of Experiential Education. 34(2), 164-181. Retrieved from: https://www.tamiu.edu/profcenter/documents/Meta-AnalysisoftheImpactofSLonStudentts_2011.pdf Delors, J. (1996). Informe Delors. La educación encierra un tesoro. Madrid: Unesco-Santillana. Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Thousand Oaks. Sage Publications. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Editorial MacMillan. Dewey, J. (2004). Democracia y educación. Madrid: Morata Eliot, J. (1990). La investigación-acción en educación. Madrid: Morata. Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publishing. Hargreaves, A. (1999). Profesorado, cultura y postmodernidad. Madrid: Morata. LOE (2006). Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. BOE núm. 106. Puig, J. M., Batlle, R., Bosch, C., i Palos, J. (2006). Aprenentatge servei. Educar per a la ciutadania. Barcelona: Octaedro. Puig, J., y Palos, J. (2006). Rasgos pedagógicos del aprendizaje-servicio. Cuadernos de pedagogía. 357. 60-63. Disponible en: http://roserbatlle.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/ras gos-pedagogicos.pdf Pujolàs, P. (2008). 9 ideas clave: el aprendizaje cooperativo. Barcelona: Edicions Graó. Stenhouse, L. (1998). Cultura y Educación. Sevilla: MCEP. UNESCO (2005). Guidelines for inclusión: Ensuring Access to Education for All. París: UNESCO. Retrieved from:: http://unesco.org/educacion/inclusive. UNESCO (2015a): Education For All 2000-2015: Achievements And Challenges. París: UNESCO. Retrieved from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002322/232205e.pdf UNESCO (2015b). Rethinking Education. Towards a global common good?. Paris: Unesco. Retrieved from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002325/232555e.pdf UNESCO Y OEI (2017). Diálogo Mundial y Liderazgo Intelectual. Disponible en: http://www.ibe.unesco.org/es/recursos?search_api_views_fulltext=%22cie%2048areunion%202008 Unión Europea (2006). Recomendación del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de 18 de Diciembre de 2006 sobre las competencias clave para el aprendizaje permanente. 2006/962/CE. Disponible en: http://infofpe.cea.es/fpe/norm/Rec%2018_2006.pdf. Urbina, C., Simón, C., y Echeita, G. (2011). Concepciones de los profesores acerca de las conductas disruptivas: análisis a partir de un marco inclusivo. Infancia y Aprendizaje 34(2), 205-217.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.