Societal Evolution, institutional Injunctions and Physical Education teaching. How do Students and Teachers perceive Sexism and Homophobia ?
Author(s):
Sigolene Couchot-Schiex (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

27 SES 10 A JS, Gender Issues and Physical Education

Joint Paper Session NW 18 and NW 27

Time:
2017-08-24
15:30-17:00
Room:
K3.02
Chair:
Fiona Chambers
Discussant:
Marie Öhman

Contribution

Physical Education (PE) does not get out of (cannot be dissociated from ?) societal evolution. In France, the ministry of education is involved in gender equality and fights against homophobia. Many official texts have been promulgated since 2000 to promote gender equality and fight discriminations based on gender and sexual orientation.

Though, this seems not to be sufficient. Although texts provide value to these issues, teaching practices poorly change. Sexist and homophobic bullying is still present during classes but awareness weakly increases. In these conditions can learning process be secure? Sexism and homophobia are major issues. Their consequences are rejection, exclusion and marginalisation of the most vulnerable youth. When he or she does not matches norms and sexual standards – even when same-sex sexuality is only suspected – this adolescent can be subjected to mockeries, threats, intimation and physical assaults. Sexism and homophobia are an insidious, ordinary, and invisible bullying. The bullying process can also go as far as an exclusion of peer-group, absenteeism (common in PE), school dropout or worse, can lead to suicide. In France, educational staffs as well as teachers do not seem to be aware of these concerns, and frequently ignore this type of bullying. Yet their responsibility is engaged when troubles take place at school or during classes.  

French scientific literature suffers of a lack of research on these issues. There are theoretical frameworks but they do not include gender studies approach. Most of French studies focuses on homosexuality and are present in sport studies but do not take into account educational issues. Even though latest studies highlighted homophobic violence in sport contexts, school environment is still not examined. Only one conference has been planned on these thematics gathering researchers in a French context (Férez, Héas, Liotard, 2010). Also, English literature proposes a more developed framework. Sexism is explored in a broader spectrum more in its links with gender equality than discrimination (in France Héas, Férez, Bodin, Robène, 2009). There is still a lack of data and studies exploring this problematic specifically in education and still more in physical education, sport and physical practices. Well-known authors publishing in English language reviews produced since at least 12 years a scientific approach on the subject of homophobia mostly. Previously studies related to sport and masculinity for example Sabo & Runfola (1980) started with Jocks: Sports and Male Identity. Messner is also a noted author frequently read and quoted in the literature about masculinity, sport and domination (1988, 1989) masculinity and violence in Sport (1990), gender (1992), male-female relations in sports (2002). Others, such as Pronger (1990), contribute to develop this research agenda. While masculinity as a subject expanded in the 1990 decade, femininity as well as female positions and claims in sport developed significantly less in sport research fields except from Théberge (1987, 1995). Of course, the main framework about masculinity must be accorded to the sociologist R.W. Connell (1995) with the major publication Masculinity, belatedly translated into French in 2014. In the late 2000-decade homophobia as a research subject began to emerge in sport literature and in physical education in themargins in English contexts but barely moved to France except in feminist studies.

 

Method

Preliminary investigative research has been carried out on this theme in a semi-rural secondary school. In-depth interviews with key professionals and a wide range of EP teachers were conducted (6 PE teachers – 2 women 4 man – Principal Educational Adviser and school nurse). In the same time focus groups were conducted with 5 classes (95 pupils – girls 45 / boys 47). The purpose of the data collection was to be able to draw a map of social representations and perceptions about homophobia as well as sexism in PE classes and to understand them more profoundly for both pupils and adults on this issue. Do they gather the same consideration or disregard of the concern? What kind of awareness do the adults take into account ? Do pupils (?) gather social representation when they are a girl or a boy ? Do some of their views contrast with the view of the majority ? What do they say about bullying and harassment coming from the criterions of sex or sexuality ?

Expected Outcomes

Results show a differentiated view of homophobia as well as sexism between adults and young people. Physical Education is viewed as a pleasant school discipline without problems or violence as everyone agrees to say. Nevertheless, women of the adult sample seem more concerned and report more violent facts. Is there a gender effect ? Teachers take sometimes sexism into account whereas it seems more difficult for young people to define it. Both boys and girls often consider it as humour, joke or part of heterosexual relationship. They barely consider it as a first sign leading to discrimination. Homophobic bullying seems not to be perceived by young people or by the adults. They are weakly reported but are more reported by male teachers. Is gender effect confirmed ? In conclusion, this exploratory study documented the process of social representation of homophobia and sexism with a particular attention to violent forms as bullying in PE classes. The phenomenon looks better like ordinary and a well-integrated notion making it difficult to fight. First of all, it supposes to identify behaviours and languages that conduct to most serious troubles. All adults and more specifically teachers have called for a specific professional training.

References

Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, University of California Press. Version française (2014). Masculinités. Paris : Editions Amsterdam. Férez, S., Héas, S. & Liotard, P. (2010) Colloque Education et Homophobie, une forme de discrimination dans le système éducatif : Etats des lieux, actions et relais de l'action, Résumés et Abstracts, 76. Héas, S., Férez, S., Kergoat, R., Bodin & D. Robène, L. (2009). Violences sexistes et sexuelles dans les sports: exemple de l'humour et de l'insulte. Genre sexualité et société, [En ligne], 1 | Printemps 2009, mis en ligne le 29 juin 2009, consulté le 22 mars 2014. URL : http://gss.revues.org/287 Messner, M. A. (1988). Sports and male domination: The female athlete as contested ideological terrain. Sociology of Sport Journal, 5, 97-211 Messner, M. A. (1989). Masculinities and athletic careers. Gender and Society, 3, 71-88 Messner, M. A. (1990). When bodies are weapons : Masculinity and violence in Sport, International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 25, 203-220. Messner, M. A. (1992). Power at play : sports and the problem of masculinity. Boston : Beacon Press. Messner, M. A. (2002). Taking the field: Women and men in sports. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Pronger, B. (1990). The Arena of masculinity : sports, homosexuality, and the meaning of sex. New York : St Martin’s Press. Sabo. D. F. & Runfola, R. (Eds.). (1980). Jock: Sports and Male Identity. Prentice- Hall : Englewood Cliffs. N.J. Théberge, N. (1987). Sport and Women’s Empowerment. Women’s Studies International Forum, 10(4). Théberge, N. (1995). Gender, Sport and the Construction of Community: A Case Study from Women’s Ice Hockey’, Sociology of Sport Journal, 12(4), 389-40

Author Information

Sigolene Couchot-Schiex (presenting / submitting)
Paris-Est Creteil University
Ecole Supérieure du Professorat et de l'Education
Abergement Clémenciat

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.