Session Information
27 SES 02 B, Sexism and Gender Equity in Educational Practices
Pecha Kucha Session
Contribution
International studies have established gender as a predominant factor when it comes to violence, both school-based and other (Skinner, Hester & Malos, 2012). Cyberbullying is no exception: acts of cyberviolence disproportionally target girls and women (Snell & Englander, 2010). It is notably the case for cybersexism, referring to types of violence that are sexist, homophobic (lesbophobic) or sexual in nature, and whose aim is to reiterate dominant gender norms targeting girls and boys. Through the online dissemination of gender norms, it affects both groups, tarnishing the former’s reputation and threatening the latter’s masculinity (Payne & Smith, 2016). Contrary to popular beliefs linking cyberbullying and stranger danger, this communication will discuss how cybersexism can come to play out in school environments and affect school climate and learning environments. It will argue in favour of the concept of cybersexism to designate the multiple ways girls –but also boys- are put back into their “gendered” place at all times, in the classroom and even in cyberspace. In fact, we suggest both spaces form a single socialization space, continuously active as some youth even sleep with their smartphones. Despite growing social and scientific concern, cybersexism is hardly examined as influencing the classroom context. This research conducted in French classrooms suggests sexist and cybersexist bullying are not tenuous or sparse phenomenons. They carry real impacts for boys and girls, while remaining a specific and serious problem for teenage girls (Gradinger & al., 2009).
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Couchot-Schiex, S. B. Moignard & G. Richard (2016). Cybersexisme : une étude sociologique dans des établissements scolaires franciliens. Paris: Centre Hubertine Auclert. [on line]. Dobson, A.S. & J. Ringrose (2015). Sext education: pedagogies of sex, gender and shame in the schoolyards of Tagged and Exposed. Sex Education, 16(1), Gradinger, P., D. Strohmeier et C. Spiel (2009). Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying: Identification of Risk Groups for Adjustment Problems. Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 205-213 Payne, E. & M. Smith (2016). Bullying as Gender Policing. In E. Brockenbrough, J. Ingrey, W. Martino et N.M. Rodriguez. Queer Studies in Education: Critical Concepts for the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan. Ringrose, J., L. Harvey, R. Gill & S. Livingstone (2013). ‘Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange’, Feminist Theory, 14:3, 305-323. Skinner, T., M. Hester & E. Malos (eds.) (2012). Researching gender violence. Feminist methodology in action. New York: Routledge. Snell, P.A. & E. Englander (2010). Cyberbullying victimization and behaviors among girls: Applying research findings in the field. MARC Publications, Paper 4.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.