The Impact of Specific Class Profiles on Within-School Segregation in Germany
Author(s):
Sonja Nonte (presenting / submitting) Tobias C. Stubbe (presenting) Mareike Haas Maria Krieg
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

09 SES 04 A, Investigating School Composition Effects

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-23
09:00-10:30
Room:
W3.11
Chair:
Kajsa Yang Hansen

Contribution

Recently more and more schools in Europe develop specific school or class profiles. An international example for a specific school profile is the European School, which exists in many European countries. One of the most widely spread class profiles in Germany are bilingual classes, music classes (e.g. Yamaha classes) or science classes. The benefit for attending such a class in the first place is the promotion of students’ skills and the reinforcement of their individual interests. In addition, an increasing number of schools use profiles to attract students and to be able to keep up their enrolment figures (Altrichter, Heinrich & Soukup-Altrichter, 2011). On the one hand, school and class profiles enable schools to react to internal and external requirements in a way that accounts for the needs of all groups involved in a specific school. On the other hand, schools can actively influence their student body by explicitly or implicitly selecting certain groups of students whenever there is a surplus of applications (Weiss, 2001). Several studies show that selection processes concerning the choice of the type of secondary school (Gymnasium [upper secondary school] or integrierte/kooperative Gesamtschule [comprehensive school]) as well as the choice of specific schools in a certain city or area are related to students’ social background and social class affiliation (Conger, 2005; Maaz, Nagy, Jonkmann & Baumert, 2009). Up to now, selection processes for the registration for a class with a specific profile have hardly been subject to empirical research.

Method

The project ProfilBildung an Niedersächsischen Gymnasien und Integrierten Gesamtschulen (ProBiNi) [The Development of School and Class Profiles in Upper Secondary and Comprehensive Schools in the German Federal State of Lower Saxony] allows for a systematic and multi-perspective first-time analysis of these aspects. The study is a longitudinal survey (project period: 2016–2019) with three measurement points starting in grade 5 (students at the age of 10) and finishing in grade 7 (students at the age of 12). Twelve schools in two regions of Lower Saxony that offer one of the most common specific class profiles (music/orchestra or science oriented) are investigated. Within these schools one class with a specific profile and another class without profile are surveyed. Moreover, a cross-sectional sample of four classes in four schools without class profiles is implemented as a control group. The Data collection for the first of the three measurement points at the beginning of grade 5 was carried out in autumn 2016. Using standardized questionnaires students (n = 791), parents (n ~ 500), teachers (n ~ 60) and principals (n ~ 16) were asked for their attitudes towards and their choice of specific school and class profiles. Furthermore, students’ school achievement as well as their profile-specific skills were analyzed in a quasi-experimental design (treatment group vs. reference group).

Expected Outcomes

First analyses address correlations between class composition and students’ socioeconomic background as well as regional aspects of the school. We expect to find evidence that students in classes with special profiles differ from their fellow students in the other classes at their school with regard to their socioeconomic background, school achievement and educational aspirations. Moreover, it can be assumed that schools in urban regions explicitly use the strategy of class profiles to distinguish themselves from other schools in the region. These analyses will be presented and discussed with special focus on the upcoming data collection of the next measurement points in 2017 and 2018.

References

Altrichter, H., Heinrich, M. & Soukup-Altrichter, K. (Hrsg.). (2011). Schulentwicklung durch Schulprofilierung? Zur Veränderung von Koordinationsmechanismen im Schulsystem. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Conger, D. (2005). Within-School Segregation in an Urban School District. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27 (3), 225–244. Maaz, K., Nagy, G., Jonkmann, K. & Baumert, J. (2009). Eliteschulen in Deutschland. Eine Analyse zur Existenz von Exzellenz und Elite in der gymnasialen Bildungslandschaft aus einer institutionellen Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 55 (2), 211–227. Weiß, M. (2001). Quasi-Märkte im Schulbereich. Eine ökonomische Analyse. In J. Oelkers (Hrsg.), Zukunftsfragen der Bildung (Zeitschrift für Pädagogik Beiheft, Bd. 43, S. 69–85). Weinheim [u.a.]: Beltz.

Author Information

Sonja Nonte (presenting / submitting)
Georg-August-University Göttingen
Institute of Educational Science
Göttingen
Tobias C. Stubbe (presenting)
University of Göttingen
Institute for Educational Science
Göttingen
Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Göttingen

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.