Factors influencing elementary schooling in selected European countries in the context of OECD future scenarios
Author(s):
Silvie Kucerova (presenting / submitting) Petr Meyer (presenting) Petr Trahorsch
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Poster

Session Information

14 SES 04.5 PS, General Poster Session

General Poster Session

Time:
2017-08-23
12:00-13:30
Room:
W4.corridor (Poster Area)
Chair:

Contribution

Contemporary Europe faces many hardly soluble challenges. Be they geopolitical controversies, migration movements, clash of cultural groups, economical, demographical or environmental problems. What is the role of education in looking for answer to all these as well as others tasks? Public consensus perceives it as fundamental (e.g. Woodhall 1997; Woolcock, Narayan 2000). Therefore, many reflections deals with principle, goals and effectivity of educational systems in various countries. And more and more they are discussed a sustainability of educational systems or scenarios of their future development. As an example six OECD The Schooling for Tomorrow Scenarios (OECD 2011) could be mentioned. They work with continuation of existing models of school institutions (status quo) or with strengthening of schools and diversification of their functions and forms or on the other hand, with a decline in the position of schools comparing to another forms of education.

At the same time, each country has different position for providing and development of educational systems which arise from local incidence of general developmental trends, as well as from regionally and historically specific conditions (Wahla 1988). The conception of school policy, the character of school system, school distribution and educational provision are influenced by many factors, which could be classified according to various aspects. They could be distinguished on exogenous factors, e.g. natural conditions, population density (Cortbett 2007), and endogenous or subjective factors, e.g. human and social capital of providers and implementators of education, value and image of education among public (Holloway, Pimlott-Wilson 2012). Further, they could be distinguished on factors which directly influence supply and demand for education (e.g. population development and number of pupils, school laws) (Hulík, Tesárková 2009) and implicit factors (e.g. cultural norms, economical situation of the state or the region) (Sherman, Sage 2011).

On general level the aim of the poster is to classify the factors influencing the elementary schooling in selected countries through the whole Europe from the West to the East with references to relevant literature. Further, on empirical level, several key factors will be analysed in more detail. Their current stage or longer development will be compared with the aim to categorize the countries to several typological groups. The conditions for schooling in particular countries and typological groups will be compared not only in table representation but their differentiations will be presented even cartographically in maps. As a conclusion, the empirically studied conditions in the typological groups of countries will be discussed in relationship to theoretically defined OECD The Schooling for Tomorrow Scenarios.

Method

The presented study is based on the analysis and comparison of characteristics of elementary schooling and wider socio-economical context, from transversal perspective of current stage, as well as in long-term development perspective. Information and data will be find out both from primary and secondary sources. From the primary sources, such as OECD or United Nations statistics, especially quantitative statistical data (number of children in their school age, number of schools etc.) and geospatial data (e.g. topographical data, population size and the area of municipalities, data about transportation network) were derived. Rather in the secondary sources, namely in the texts by the other researchers or in the surveys and reports about education from particular countries the information about wider context of schooling have their origin (e.g. information about natural conditions in the countries, guidelines for education policy, length and organization of elementary education, average size of school and their structure according to a provider of education or development of numbers of schools in particular countries). Wide range of the information was provided by co-authors of the international monograph deals with rural schooling in different European countries. It will be expressed them named thanks on the poster. The quantitative as well as qualitative data about studied countries will be organized into the table. The information will be compared and the countries will be sorted to groups according to similarities of particular characteristics. Some information will be presented not only in graphs but even with utilization of GIS, in maps through methods of thematic cartography.

Expected Outcomes

Direct and implicit factors relating to function of educational systems in particular European countries are different, therefore the countries also have different disposition to future development of schooling, e.g. according to scenarios of OECD (2011). For instance it could be demonstrated on the example of Czechia and Finland. On the one hand, Czechia was a witness of massive school closure during the 1960s and the 1970s, when the total number of schools fell down to a half of starting value (Kučerová, Kučera 2012). On the other hand, contemporary Finland finds itself in the middle of one of the most significant school reduction in its history (Autti, Hyry-Beihammer 2014; Kalaoja, Pietarinen 2009; Tantarimäki 2011). In general, the countries in the middle of the processes, which the other countries already went through, might learn from the others’ experience. They could avoid possible risks of such development and subsequently they could try to prevent or at least reduce the risks. Nevertheless, in Czechia and Finland the historical context, the settlement structure, the distribution of population or the size of local government units responsible for organization of elementary education are entirely different. Therefore, it is not possible to implement the mutual experiences between any countries non-critically and to anticipate the same development. Thus the OECD (2011) scenarios could offer the way of control school system management. Or, at least, to help in the interpretation of passing processes in education and schooling.

References

AUTTI, O., HYRY-BEIHAMMER, E. K. (2014): School closures in rural Finnish communities. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 29(1), pp. 1–17. CORBETT, M. (2007): Learning to Leave: The Irony of Schooling in a Coastal Community. Fernwood Publishing, Black Point, 192 p. HOLLOWAY, S. L., PIMLOTT-WILSON, H. (2012): Neoliberalism, policy localisation and idealised subjects: A case study on educational restructuring in England. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(4), pp. 639–654. HULÍK, V., TESÁRKOVÁ, K. (2009): Influence of demographic development on education system in the Czech Republic. Orbis Scholae, 3(3), pp. 7–23 (in Czech). KALAOJA, E., PIETARINEN, J. (2009): Small rural primary schools in Finland: A pedagogically valuable part of the school network. International Journal of Educational Research, 48, pp. 109–116. KUČEROVÁ, S., KUČERA, Z. (2012): Changes in the spatial distribution of elementary schools and their impact on rural communities in Czechia in the second half of the 20th century. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 27(11), pp. 1–17. OECD (2011): What Schools for the Future? OECD Publishing, Paris. SHERMAN, J., SAGE, R. (2011): Sending off all your good treasures: Rural schools, brain-drain, and community survival in the wake of economic collapse. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26(11), pp. 1–14. TANTARIMÄKI, S. (2011): Mitä lakkautuksesta opimme? University of Turku, Turku, 109 p. WOODHALL, M. (1997): Human capital concepts. In: Halsey, A. H., Lauder, H., Brown, P., Wells, A. S. (eds.): Education. Culture, Economy, and Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 219–223. WOOLCOCK, M., NARAYAN, D. (2000): Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and The World bank 15(2), pp. 225–249. WAHLA, A. (1988): Geography of Education of Inhabitants. SPN, Praha, 189 p (in Czech).

Author Information

Silvie Kucerova (presenting / submitting)
Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Faculty of Science
Department of Geography
Usti nad Labem
Petr Meyer (presenting)
Charles University
Department of Social Geography and Regional Development
Praha
J. E. Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Faculty of Education, Czechia

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.