There is no educational secularisation. A typology of school systems based on their degree of secularisation
Author(s):
Simon Gordt (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-22
15:15-16:45
Room:
K3.19
Chair:
Elena Tabacchi

Contribution

The formation of national education systems during the 19th century marks the beginning of modern schooling in Europe (Green 1990) and school has been established as a public institution (Herrlitz, Hopf, and Titze 1984). Originally, education was part of the churches domain for centuries (Davie 2000) but became a fundamental feature of the modern state and replaced the churches in terms of their responsibility eventually (Mann und Schinkele 2005; Lehmann 2004). Because “the religious and the secular are inextricably linked throughout modern European history” (José Casanova 2009, 227), educational institutionalization must be considered part of a general secularisation process: religious institutions lose their social significance and their grasp on the agencies of social control and withdraw from their classical sphere of influence (Wilson 1982; Berger 1973).

However, because the state was, among others, strongly aided by the church’s example of both administrative structure and claims to original sovereignty (Ramirez and Boli 1987), churches still remain influential in the educational field (Davie 2000). Hence, this paper will analyse the religious influence on modern schooling from a comparative-historical perspective and will therefore inquire to what extent the religious impact differs within the European school systems. Finally, this analysis offers a typology of Western European school systems based on their degree of secularisation.

Secularisation is defined as a multi-dimensional concept (Jose Casanova 1994) and will be used only in an institutional perspective, i.e. secularisation refers to a decrease of religious authority (Chaves 1994). I argue that – taken together – the three dimensions’ administration (supervision and funding), religious education (organization, conduction, teachers), and private schools (organization, amount) are capable of capturing the change of religious authority in the educational field.

Historically, the main dimension administration dominates the other two because the state replaced the churches from their responsibility eventually. Therefore, the secondary dimensions’, religious education and private schools, determine the differences of each secularisation path.

This leaves us with five potential types illustrating the different degrees of educational secularisation and forming a continuum from a confessional school system to a secular one. The former means that the churches dominate all three dimensions, while in the latter system the churches only play a minor or no role at all. Between those two poles, three types are possible which are a combination of the two secondary dimensions. In the traditional school system, no or hardly any private confessional schools are part of the national system and there is a confessional religious instruction in every public school. The dual system describes a school system consisting of state schools and private schools, whereby with the latter is normally being a church school. And Finally, the traditional dual system that is basically a combination of the former two.

The study argues that the three intermediate types display different paths of educational institutionalisation differentiated by their degree of secularisation. 

Method

The historical study compares six national school systems concerning their degree of secularisation. The case selection is based primarily on the work of William C. Cummings (2004) and David Martin (1978) and concentrates on Western Europe. This paper argues that particular countries can be representatives of each European region. Therefore, the study assumes that the categorisation of each country also represents a rough categorization of each region. Cummings (2004) studied the institutionalisation of modern education and declares England, France, and Germany the pioneering societies of modern education, whereas Martin (1978) concentrates his study on the relationship between the religious and political spheres. He distinguishes three basic categories of secularisation in Western Europe, which he differentiates further: primarily according to their degree of pluralism and secondarily in their Calvinist salience and their state church relation The result is a Protestant, a religiously mixed and a Catholic category. The present study combines both approaches and tries to do justice to the above differentiations by comparing six countries. England and Sweden are scrutinized as protestant countries that differ in their religious pluralism. The Netherlands and Germany have been chosen as representatives of religiously-mixed countries differing with regard to their Lutheran or Calvinistic characteristics. Austria and France are examined as catholic countries differing in their church-state nexus. The French Revolution marks the starting point of the phase of nation building (Rokkan 2000) and, therefore, the institutionalization of national school systems. Hence, this study starts at the beginning of the nineteenth century. By using a process tracing methodology (Beach und Pedersen 2013) this paper reconstructs the secularisation paths of each national school system and uses several historical case studies as its database in terms of a qualitative content analysis (Mayring 2015).

Expected Outcomes

According to Rokkan's (2000) theory of state formation and nation building and Martin’s (1978) theory of secularisation, it can be expected that the third intermediate type (traditional dual system) will not find any empirical equivalent. Along with the empirical findings by Soysal und Strang (1989) who differentiate two types of institutionalisation of modern educational system (societal construction vs. state construction), the other two intermediate types must be considered rival paths. Furthermore, it will be hypothesized that a traditional system should evolve in every country where the state is mainly responsible for the formation of the school system. A dual system, in contrast, should be found in all those countries where the formation of the school system lay mainly in the hand of societal actors. These two different sides have been caused, in particular, by the degree of religious pluralism, the connection of state and church, and the degree of social differentiation. Therefore, a dual system should evolve in England, the Netherlands, and France, whereas a traditional system should develop in Sweden, Germany, and Austria.

References

Beach, Derek, und Rasmus Brun Pedersen. 2013. Process-tracing methods: foundations and guidelines. University of Michigan Press. Berger, Peter L. 1973. Zur Dialektik von Religion und Gesellschaft. Conditio humana. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer. Casanova, Jose. 1994. «Public Religions in the Modern World». Chicago, IL: University of Chi-cago Press. CasanovaPublic Religions in the Modern World. Casanova, José. 2009. «The religious situation in Europe». Secularization and the World Religions, 206–28. Chaves, Mark. 1994. «Secularization as declining religious authority». Social forces 72 (3): 749–74. Cummings, William K. 2004. «The institutions of education: A comparative study of educational development in the six core nations». In . Symposium books. Davie, Grace. 2000. Religion in Modern Europe: A Memory Mutates: A Memory Mutates. New York: Oxford University Press. Green, Andy. 1990. Education and State Formation. The Rise of Education Systems in England, France and the USA. London: Macmillan. Herrlitz, Hans-Georg, Wulf Hopf, und Hartmut Titze. 1984. Organisation, Recht und Oekonomie des Bildungswesens. Herausgegeben von Martin Baethge und Knut Nevermann. Bd. 5. Enzyklopädie Erziehungswissenschaft / hrsg. von Dieter Lenzen ... ; 5. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. Lehmann, Hartmut. 2004. Säkularisierung: der europäische Sonderweg in Sachen Religion. Bd. 5. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag. Mann, Christine, und Brigitte Schinkele. 2005. «Österreich». In Kirche und Erziehung in Europa, herausgegeben von Karl Ballestrem, Sergio Belardinelli, und Thomas Cornides, 203–24. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Martin, David. 1978. A General Theory of Secularization. Explorations in interpretative sociology. Oxford: Blackwell. Mayring, Philipp. 2015. Qualitative inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz Verlagsgruppe. Ramirez, Francisco O., und John Boli. 1987. «The Politcal Construction of Mass Schooling: European Origins and Worldwide Institutionalization». Sociology of Education 60 (1): 2–17. Rokkan, Stein. 2000. Staat, Nation und Demokratie in Europa. Herausgegeben von Flora Peter. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoglu, und David Strang. 1989. «Construction of the First Mass Education Systems in Nineteenth-Century Europe». Sociology of Education 62 (4): 277–88. Wilson, Bryan R. 1982. Religion in sociological perspective. Oxford University Press.

Author Information

Simon Gordt (presenting / submitting)
University of Bamberg
Department of Sociology
Bamberg

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.