On the Verge of Tears: Emotions
Author(s):
Marie Hållander (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

13 SES 11, Emotions, Literacy, and Thinking Against Intelligence

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-24
17:15-18:45
Room:
W6.18
Chair:
Lovisa Bergdahl

Contribution

In this paper presentation I intend to present a developed part of my PhD thesis from 2016 (planed re-publlication by Eskaton during spring 2017). In my thesis Det omöjliga vittnandet: om vittnesmålets pedgogiska möjligheter (The Impossibile Witnessing : On the Pedagogical Possibilities of Testimony) I develop a phenomenon that society at large, but also philosophy and education have great interest in; namely the phenomenon of testimony and witnessing.

In my thesis I investigate what testimonies and the act of witnessing can do in relation to education. More specifically, I investigate what kind of pedagogical possibilities there are in witnessing and testimony, in relation to teaching as well as outside schools. I do this by focusing on three different aspects (of these phenomena), namely representation, subjectivity and emotion. Three aspects that relate to the phenomenon of testimony – but also have bearing on the daily life and work of teaching. In the paper presentation at ECER I will focus on one of these aspects; namely on emotions.

Within educational research, testimony is used to understand and develop epistemological, political or ethical thinking. Educational research shows how the use of testimony in teaching can carry on opportunities for students to create various teaching related positive values, such as a historical consciousness or an ethical approach to the world and other people, or how being exposed to various testimonies could bring about feelings and emotions - or even crises. These feelings or crises can be the starting point towards dealing with historical traumas, and through that be the basis for knowledge of history, including histories of those different from oneself and/or from other parts of the world. Testimonies carry the idea of being singular and to be “true” stories, this is why students and pupils exposed to testimonies are also considered of value when working with historical trauma and attempting to bring consciousness and personal ethical reflection.

For example, Felman and Laub (1991) write how the encountering with the literary testimonies may involve a learning situation where students who are exposed to testimonies become emotionally involved, and by that, the students can be taught. Felman and Laub examine the relationship between students’ crises and pedagogy, and consider the emotions and personal crisis as an opportunity for learning. It is by being deeply affected by testimony that the students can learn something.

In this paper presentation I therefore develop and gives a critique of the idea that emotions and personal crisis are possible ways for teaching and for learning to develop moral compasses or as ways to work towards social justice.

For clarification. in the thesis, and paper presentation, I examine the pedagogical possibilities of testimony and witnessing based on the idea that such possibilities are situated in human imperfection and lack of ability, where the knowledge is placed in the impossibility, in our not-knowing. This dialectical understanding, drawing on Giorgio Agamben (1999), implies a different formulation than previous research, by highlighting the impossibility of witnessing and of testimony, for example by how the testimony does not stand outside the political, and in Western society more specifically, the capitalist system.

 

Method

My approach is philosophical, where I conduct a philosophical assessment to examine the educational issues that I investigate. The thesis is grounded in three different parts, where the first part is an extension of previous research, the second is a theoretical basis in Giorgio Agamben's philosophy, and the third part is in relation to various examples of testimonies. I here therefore want to say something about what it means to write with examples and what these do for my argument. Testimonies can come in many forms and I do not need a stamp of approval to allow it to pass as such. In the thesis I start with an event from my own teaching, being exposed with Collateral Murder. In the paper presentation on emotions I will also discuss pictures taken by Nilüfer Demir with Alan Kurdi from 2015. The different examples that I use, they are singular, unique stories, but this does not mean that they are entities that are separated from the world. Agamben shows how the example stands in relation, and is not autonomous but is related; it move from the singular to another singularity and by that, Agamben writes that the examples make it “more knowable”. The example help me to analyse the study’s objective, through the way the examples embody the problem and make it more knowable.

Expected Outcomes

Through the analyses of testimony I show how testimonies can serve as a way to control the students' emotions and perceptions and influence the perception of the society in which the students live. The act of witnessing can be done at the witness’ own expense (drawing on The Latina Feminist Group, 2002). It can mean that testimonies work as a way to reproduce various stereotypes of different people's suffering and thus consolidate existing power structures and identities. The conditions surrounding witnessing and testimonies make witnessing an act that can be perceived as a poetic testimony, as well as an exploitation or expropriation of already vulnerable people. Through a critic of emotions in relation to encountering testimonies in teaching, mainly through Ahmed (2004) and Todd (2003), I argue that emotions are cultural practices, not psychological states, and are through that relational. These emotional and relational practices can also function to bring borders (as between “we and them”) and through that are not able to bring pedagogical possibilities. From this light, I develop the argument into two different movements. The first movement is about what listening has to offer, and the other concerns opacity in relation to transparency, based on Glissant (1997) and Zembylas (2012, 2015). I here argue that the students’ opacity must be preserved for a teaching that does not want to exploit pupils. Through these two movements, listening and opacity, the paper presentation returns to the impossibility of testimony and formulates the ambivalence that exists in teaching. With this said, I do argue for the value of bringing into teaching testimonies that testify of suffering. Testimonies stand between the past and the future, and if testimonies are not heard in teaching, there is a possibility of silencing and forgetting the wounds in history.

References

Agamben, Giorgio. Potentialities : collected essays in philosophy. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1999. Agamben, Giorgio. Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. New York: Zone Books, 2008. Ahmed, Sara. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge, 2004. Ahmed, Sara, och Jackie Stacey. Thinking through the skin. London: Routledge, 2001. Felman, Shoshana & Laub, Dori. Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis and History. New York: Routledge, 1991. Glissant, Édouard. Poetics of relation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Att rätta orätt. Hägersten: Tankekraft, 2012. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Can the subaltern speak? I: Cary Nelson och Lawrence Grossberg, Marxism and the interpretation of culture, Communications and culture (Houndmills: Macmillan Education, 1988). Todd, Sharon. Learning from the Other: Levinas, Psychoanalysis, and Ethical Possibilities in Education. State University of New York Press, 2003. The Latina Feminist Group. Telling to live: Latina feminist testimonios. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2002. Zembylas, Michalinos & McGlynn, Claire. ”Discomforting pedagogies: emotional tensions, ethical dilemmas and transformative possibilities”. British Educational Research Journal 38, nr 1 (01 februari 2012): 41–59. Zembylas, Michalinos. ”‘Pedagogy of discomfort’ and its ethical implications: the tensions of ethical violence in social justice education”. Ethics and Education 10, nr 2 (04 maj 2015): 163–74.

Author Information

Marie Hållander (presenting / submitting)
Stockholm university
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Education
Stockholm

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.