Subject-specific interests and competences of prospective students in teacher education programmes: Opportunities to integrate subject-specific questionnaires in self-assessments
Author(s):
Barbara Neunteufl (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

10 SES 05 D, Teacher Education: The development of identity

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-23
13:30-15:00
Room:
K5.07
Chair:
Chousung Yang

Contribution

Online self-assessments (OSA) for study orientation have experienced an enormous boom in the field of higher education. Various OSAs have been recently developed. In teacher education programmes OSAs are mostly voluntary, optional for those who are interested in reflecting on their suitability and aptitude for a teacher education degree. At some universities in Austria or Germany, they are compulsory by now (for example at the University of Hamburg, University of Vienna).

However, the measures that actually should be used to determine and assess this suitability and aptitude remain largely unclear, not least because they go hand-in-hand with the still unresolved matters of what constitutes a good teacher and what competences he/she might need (see Darling-Hammond 2000, Oser/Oelkers 2001, Terhart 2007). Although the discussion on appropriate criteria for determining suitability and aptitude is by no means yet concluded, many OSAs include those aspects upon which experts largely agree: cognitive abilities, motivation, values and convictions (see Baumert/Kunter 2006, Blömeke/Kaiser/Lehmann 2008).

Subject-specific aspects related to the teaching subjects have not yet been considered in OSAs. However, it is known from studies that content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge of teachers have important effects on the quality of the teaching and the pupils' performance and they correlate with each other (see Hill/Rowan/Ball 2005, Baumert et al. 2010). The three dimensions of the cognitive professional competence of future teachers (content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge) is a known differentiation in international discourses (see Schulman 1987, Bromme 2001, Weinert 2001) and in the traditional structure of teacher education programmes (subject matter, subject education and educational foundation).

In this presentation, I will focus on the questions of how these findings can be considered in OSAs and how tools integrating subject-specific questionnaires can be developed. Within this context the conceptualisation of the OSA for teacher education at the University of Vienna with its subject-specific module will be discussed.

The University of Vienna has developed a self-assessment tool (see Schrittesser 2014, Neunteufl/Bugelnig 2016). In addition to modules on pedagogic and didactic interests, degree-specific expectations, personality, cognitive abilities and case vignettes the OSA contains subject-specific interests and competences. This module offers prospective students the opportunity to complete questionnaires for all the 27 teaching subjects offered in the University of Vienna’s teacher education programme.

Method

Based on the importance of content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge of future teachers and the threefold division of teacher education programmes, this presentation gives a theoretically overview of the conceptualisation of the OSA for teacher education at the University of Vienna focusing on the subject-specific module. The statistical data available on student numbers for the different subjects they have chosen in the OSA (they have to select a minimum of two and a maximum of four different teaching subjects and answer specific questions on those particular subjects) will be analysed for the years 2015 until 2017. This time frame covers the deep change that teacher education in Austria has undergone in 2016. The teacher education for all secondary schools is now undertaken in four different consortia in Austria (the University of Vienna, for example, offers this “Verbundstudium” together with PH Wien, KPH Wien, PH Niederösterreich and the Hochschule für Agrar- und Umweltpädagogik). So, the teacher education for the secondary school in Austria is offered at two different institutions, the Pädagogischen Hochschulen and the universities, which is an exception compared to other European countries (Bauer/Prenzel 2012). This study will shed a first light on the subject-specific interests of students. Moreover, in this research project I focus on the following questions: (1) Is there a relationship between pedagogic/didactic interests and subject-specific interests of prospective students? (2) Is there a relationship between subject-specific interests and subject-specific competences of prospective students? In order to answer these two research questions statistically, data from prospective students who have completed the OSA are used.

Expected Outcomes

The empirical-quantitative results deepen the understanding for integrating subject-specific questionnaires in OSAs. This presentation will give a valuable insight into the self-reported subject-specific interests and competences of prospective students and opportunities to integrate such subject-specific questionnaires in self-assessment tools. Research in this field could be used to improve OSAs for teacher education programmes not only in Austria, because it points out that it is up to teacher education to implement appropriate measures (incl. subject-specific aspects) to determine and assess students’ aptitude for a teaching degree. Such measures make an important contribution to raise the quality of Europes teacher education.

References

Bauer, J. & Prenzel, M. (2012). European Teacher Training Reforms. Science, 336(6089), p. 1642-1643. Baumert, J. & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9(4), S. 469-520. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Dubberke, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M. & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), p. 133-180. Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G. & Lehmann, R. (Hrsg.) (2008). Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer: Wissen, Überzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare. Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerbildung. Münster: Waxmann Verlag. Bromme, R. (2001). Teacher Expertise. In N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopaedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (p. 15459-15465). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Achives, 8, p. 1-46. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B. & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), p. 371-406. Neunteufl, B. & Bugelnig, A. (2016). Das mehrstufige Online-Self-Assessment an der Universität Wien. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 11(1), S. 209-224. Oser, F. & Oelkers, J. (Hrsg.) (2001). Die Wirksamkeit der Lehrerbildungssysteme. Chur, Zürich: Rüegger. Schrittesser, I. (2014). Initial Teacher Education: Potentials and limitations of entry procedures into teacher education. Research results and experiences. Symposium paper contributed at the European Conference of Educational Research, Porto, 4. September 2014 (unpublished). Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), p. 1-22. Terhart, E. (2007). Erfassung und Beurteilung der beruflichen Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. In M. Lüders & J. Wissinger (Hrsg.), Forschung zur Lehrerbildung. Kompetenzentwicklung und Programmevaluation (S. 37-62). Münster: Waxmann. Weinert, F.E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D.S. Rychen & L.H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (p. 45-66). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Author Information

Barbara Neunteufl (presenting / submitting)
University of Vienna, Austria

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.