10 SES 05 D, Teacher Education: The development of identity
Online self-assessments (OSA) for study orientation have experienced an enormous boom in the field of higher education. Various OSAs have been recently developed. In teacher education programmes OSAs are mostly voluntary, optional for those who are interested in reflecting on their suitability and aptitude for a teacher education degree. At some universities in Austria or Germany, they are compulsory by now (for example at the University of Hamburg, University of Vienna).
However, the measures that actually should be used to determine and assess this suitability and aptitude remain largely unclear, not least because they go hand-in-hand with the still unresolved matters of what constitutes a good teacher and what competences he/she might need (see Darling-Hammond 2000, Oser/Oelkers 2001, Terhart 2007). Although the discussion on appropriate criteria for determining suitability and aptitude is by no means yet concluded, many OSAs include those aspects upon which experts largely agree: cognitive abilities, motivation, values and convictions (see Baumert/Kunter 2006, Blömeke/Kaiser/Lehmann 2008).
Subject-specific aspects related to the teaching subjects have not yet been considered in OSAs. However, it is known from studies that content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge of teachers have important effects on the quality of the teaching and the pupils' performance and they correlate with each other (see Hill/Rowan/Ball 2005, Baumert et al. 2010). The three dimensions of the cognitive professional competence of future teachers (content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge) is a known differentiation in international discourses (see Schulman 1987, Bromme 2001, Weinert 2001) and in the traditional structure of teacher education programmes (subject matter, subject education and educational foundation).
In this presentation, I will focus on the questions of how these findings can be considered in OSAs and how tools integrating subject-specific questionnaires can be developed. Within this context the conceptualisation of the OSA for teacher education at the University of Vienna with its subject-specific module will be discussed.
The University of Vienna has developed a self-assessment tool (see Schrittesser 2014, Neunteufl/Bugelnig 2016). In addition to modules on pedagogic and didactic interests, degree-specific expectations, personality, cognitive abilities and case vignettes the OSA contains subject-specific interests and competences. This module offers prospective students the opportunity to complete questionnaires for all the 27 teaching subjects offered in the University of Vienna’s teacher education programme.
Bauer, J. & Prenzel, M. (2012). European Teacher Training Reforms. Science, 336(6089), p. 1642-1643. Baumert, J. & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9(4), S. 469-520. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Dubberke, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M. & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), p. 133-180. Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G. & Lehmann, R. (Hrsg.) (2008). Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer: Wissen, Überzeugungen und Lerngelegenheiten deutscher Mathematikstudierender und -referendare. Erste Ergebnisse zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerbildung. Münster: Waxmann Verlag. Bromme, R. (2001). Teacher Expertise. In N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopaedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (p. 15459-15465). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Achives, 8, p. 1-46. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B. & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), p. 371-406. Neunteufl, B. & Bugelnig, A. (2016). Das mehrstufige Online-Self-Assessment an der Universität Wien. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 11(1), S. 209-224. Oser, F. & Oelkers, J. (Hrsg.) (2001). Die Wirksamkeit der Lehrerbildungssysteme. Chur, Zürich: Rüegger. Schrittesser, I. (2014). Initial Teacher Education: Potentials and limitations of entry procedures into teacher education. Research results and experiences. Symposium paper contributed at the European Conference of Educational Research, Porto, 4. September 2014 (unpublished). Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), p. 1-22. Terhart, E. (2007). Erfassung und Beurteilung der beruflichen Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. In M. Lüders & J. Wissinger (Hrsg.), Forschung zur Lehrerbildung. Kompetenzentwicklung und Programmevaluation (S. 37-62). Münster: Waxmann. Weinert, F.E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D.S. Rychen & L.H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (p. 45-66). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.