Overcoming the “grey area” between theory and practice on cultural diversity: evidence and implication from an Italian research
Author(s):
Luca Agostinetto (presenting / submitting) Lisa Bugno (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

07 SES 01 A, Teachers' Views on Diversity

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-22
13:15-14:45
Room:
W3.09
Chair:
Yvonne Leeman

Contribution

Culturally diverse schools have become a reality in Europe. This requires formal education to enhance its sensitivity and competence on cultural diversity in order to promote inclusion and well-being and widespread school effectiveness and achievement (Alleman-Ghionda, 2009): therefore, teachers play a crucial role. Moreover, according to OECD (2010), there is a lack of research on how teachers deal with diversity and what their needs in terms of training in this field are. Finally, studies on teachers’ beliefs about cultural diversity show ‘significant gaps in the body of knowledge’ (Gay, 2015) and according to Biesta, Priestley & Robinson (2015), teachers’ beliefs highly influence their agency.

Teachers’ beliefs have intensely been studied during the last years by psychologists and sociologists: several authors contributed defining beliefs as implicit or explicit, stable or dynamic or understanding them as individual or a part of a system. The result is a messy and inconsistent construct (Fives & Buhel, 2012) that we would like to clarify trough the research theoretical level.

In addition, we also refer to the Model in Pedagogy (Dalle Fratte, 1986; Agostinetto, 2013), that is a helpful lead to follow in planning educational activities and it is also useful in order to verify the coherence of the transition between purposes and actions in all the educational events.

The incongruity in the academic success between students from native and non-native families (OECD, 2012) and the highest in Europe teachers’ needs for professional development for teaching in a multicultural setting (OECD, 2015) should be considered as evidence of a significant gap between what the theoretical acquisitions are and their practical achievement. The transition from theory to practice has always been considered one of the most difficult and crucial points in all educational events, so the question is “what happens in this transition?” Among all the things that could meddle, we chose to focus on beliefs. The focus of the research is the relation between the teachers’ beliefs about diversity, and their teaching activities. Moreover, the purpose is studying the meaning of the belief in the educational context and in reference to the diversity content: the aim of the research is investigating both the theoretical and the empirical levels.

Method

Referring to the theoretical level, the questions regard the quest for the main branches of knowledge contemplating the meaning of the belief, and the points that should be used to qualify beliefs in a pedagogical way. In fact, the goal is to systematize the multitude of the meanings found in literature, in order to propose an accurate pedagogical consideration. Regarding the empirical level, the relation between theory, beliefs, and the teaching activities on diversity is being examined in detail using integrated analysis tools, and considering the recursive correlation between theory and practice in education as fundamental. The objectives are to investigate whether and how beliefs about diversity have implication in the education project design and in teachers’ actions. As Gay states, ‘almost all research studies and conceptual or theoretical essays involve prospective teachers’ (2015). We chose to involve 3 groups of 10 primary teachers and handle a qualitative approach: all teachers are in-service, they are female, their age is between 36 and 62 and they work in 9 different school in a city and 3 in a village. Our aims are to examine the “direct explicit” beliefs through teachers’ interviews, whereas their “indirect explicit” beliefs will be studied thanks to the analysis of intercultural education school projects. Furthermore, the participant observation is useful to investigate the teachers’ “implicit” beliefs. The analysis of the interviews was useful to define guidelines for the participant observation in addition to topics and contents to discuss and reflect on during the focus groups.

Expected Outcomes

The emerging results show a rhetoric lack of coherence between saying and doing: for example, there is agreement by teachers that is important to take advantage of cultural differences, but, in practice, most of them trivialize differences through folkloristic activities. To sum up, starting from a problematic frame that highlights how it is important and necessary to work with teachers in order to improve the transition from theory to practice, we expect that the developed program will make significant and formative the reflection on theory, beliefs and practice. If this occurs, the focus group experience should allow the reconceptualization of teachers’ beliefs about diversity, improving teaching actions and producing a positive effect on educational practice. The next steps of our research agenda will be highly engaging: besides the conclusion of the interview’s analysis, we are implementing the participant observation and the focus group. The empirical investigation will end in April 2017. Potentially, this research could be the first step to achieve a program that can better support in-service and new teachers dealing with cultural diversity.

References

AbdallahPretceille M. (2013). L'education interculturelle. Paris: Presses Universitaires De France – Puf. Agostinetto, L. (2013). Educare. Epistemologia pedagogica, logica formativa e pratica educativa, Lecce: Pensa MultiMedia Editore. Alleman Ghionda, C. (2009). “From Intercultural Education to the Inclusion of Diversity: Theories and Policies in Europe.” In The Routledge International Companion to Multicultural Education, edited by J.A. Banks. London: Routledge. Biesta G., Priestley M., Robinson S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency (pp. 624-640). In Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, Volume 21, Issue 6, 2015. Special Issue: Teachers’ Professional Agency in Contradictory Times. Taylor & Francis. Fives, H., Buhel, M. (2012), Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: what are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In Educational Psychology Handbook: Vol. 2. Individual Differences and Cultural and Contextual Factors, K. R. Harris, S. Graham, and T. Urdan. Gay G. (2015), Teachers’ Beliefs about Cultural Diversity. Problems and Possibilities. In Fives H., Gill M. G., International Handbook of Research on Teachers’ Beliefs. New York: Routledge. OECD (2010). Closing the Gap for Immigrant Students: Policies, Practice and Performance. Paris: OECD. OECD (2012). https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA-2012-results-italy.pdf OECD (2015). Helping immigrant students to succeed at school – and beyond. Paris: OECD.

Author Information

Luca Agostinetto (presenting / submitting)
University of Padova
Padova
Lisa Bugno (presenting)
University of Padova, Italy

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.