Investigating Quality in Higher Education based on Academics’ Views Concerning Effective University Teaching
Author(s):
Melek Çakmak (presenting / submitting) Ülker Akkutay
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-23
15:30-17:00
Room:
K5.19
Chair:
Kaarel Haav

Contribution

Universities as public and private higher education institutions has been criticized and called for change in this changing world (Uka, 2014). While there are many studies on universities in the scope of higher education, a few of them focus on quality (e.g., Bergseth, Petocz and Dahlgren, 2014).  On the other hand, there are many significant challenges of defining quality since quality is an elusive term as Schindler, Puls-Elvidge, Welzant and Crawford (2015) stated. Literature on this area indicate that there is still no consensus on the definition of quality (Schindler et al,  2015). Iacovidou et al. (2009; cited in Teeroovengadum, Kamalanabhan and Seebaluck, 2016) state that quality in higher education is not a unidimensional concept and is in fact best described as a set of dimensions based on the literature. In sum, there are many stakeholder such as students and teachers in higher education and they all have different roles in this context. Based on this reality, there are some studies which focus on academics' perceptions of quality in higher education and quality strategies (e.g.Mammen, 2006) whereas there are some studies which focus on students’ expectations and perceptions about university (e.g. Hill, 1995; cited in Cardona and Bravo, 2012; Spooren, Mortelmans & Denekens, 2007). Additionally, there have been also many studies which focus on understanding excellence in teaching and research (e.g.Brockerhoff, Stensaker & Huisman, 2014), effective teaching in higher education (e.g.Stephanou & Kyridis, 2012; ), effective teacher (e.g.Walker, 2008; Steele, 2010), teachers’ role (e.g.Liston, Borko & Whitcomb, 2008; Lunnenberg, Korthagen & Swennen, 2007).

From this perspective, the following research questions were addressed in this paper: (1) How do academics perceive effective university teaching? and which factors do they consider the most important for effective unversity teaching? (2) How do academics perceive effective university teacher? Which characterstics are the most important ones for them? (3) What are main differences or similarities among academics’ perceptions?

Method

This case study is conducted at Gazi University in Ankara, Turkey. The study consists of two folds: qualitative and quantitative. In this paper, only qualitative part of the research will be discussed. Mainly, it is aimed to explore and compare the perceptions of academics from different disciplines on effective university teaching and its components in the context of quality studies in higher education. An Interview Form on Effective University Teaching has been developed by the researchers in order to collect data from the participants (n=40). The researchers of this study have already completed research with teacher educators in this issue. With this study, academics’ perceptions from different faculties including Medicine, Nursing, Law are included. Academics are asked to give their perceptions regarding with effective university teaching and effective university teacher. Academics’ responses is analysed by the reseachers through content analysis technique.

Expected Outcomes

One of the expected outcomes of this research is generating profiles of effective university teaching from academics’ point of view in the quality framework at higher education. The first analysis in the research also differ in the way academics from different faculties view effective teaching. It is hoped that especially the academicians' views on effective university teaching in the research will contribute to quality studies in higher education differently. It can be considered that in this context opinion research will provide an important framework for building further research. Additionally, it is expected that this study contributes to stakeholders of quality studies including academics, students, researchers in higher education.

References

Bergseth, B., Petocz, P. & Dahlgren, M.A. (2014) Ranking quality in higher education: guiding or misleading? Quality in Higher Education, 20(3),330-348. Brockerhoff, L.; Stensaker, B. & Huisman, J. (2014) Prescriptions and perceptions of teaching excellence: a study of the national ‘Weebewerb Exzellente Lehre’ initiative in Germany, Quality in Higher Education, 20(3), 235-254. Cardona, M.M. & Bravo, J.J. (2012) Service quality perceptions in higher education institutions: the case of a colombian university, Estudios Gerenciales, 28, 23-29. Liston, D., Borko, H., & Whitcomb, J. (2008). The teacher educators’ role in enhancing teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(2), 111-116. Lunnenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 586-601. Mammen, K. J. (2006) Academics' Perceptions of "Quality in Higher Education" and Quality Strategies, South African Journal of Higher Education, 20 (5),639-654. Uka, A. (2014) Student Satisfaction as an Indicator of Quality in Higher Education, Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in The World, 4(3). Schindler, L., Puls-Elvidge, S., Welzant, H., & Crawford, L. (2015). Definitions of quality in higher education: A synthesis of the literature. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(3), 3-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v5i3.244. Spooren, P., Mortelmans, D. & Denekens, J. (2007) Student evaluation of teaching quality in higher education: development of an instrument based on 10 Likert‐scales, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(6), 667-679. Steele, N. A. (2010). Three characteristics of effective teachers. MENC, XX(X), 1-8. Stephanou, G. & Kyridis, A. (2012) University Students’ Perceptions of Teacher Effectiveness and Emotions in Lectures: The Role of Socio-cognitive Factors, and Academic Performance, International Education Studies, 5 ( 2). Teeroovengadum, V.; Kamalanabhan, T.J. & Seebaluck, A.K. (2016), Measuring service quality in higher education Development of a hierarchical model (HESQUAL), Quality Assurance in Education, 24 (2),244 – 258. Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/QAE-06-2014-0028. Walker, R.J.(2008 ) Twelve Characteristics of an Effective Teacher A Longitudinal, Qualitative, Quasi-Research Study of In-service and Pre-service Teachers’ Opinions, Educational Horizons, Fall, 61-68.

Author Information

Melek Çakmak (presenting / submitting)
Gazi University, Faculty of Education
Ankara
GAZI UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF EDUCATİON/ EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES
ANKARA

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.