Session Information
Contribution
What do we know about early prevention of learning disabilities in children of social disadvantaged families? Measures primarily focused on home visiting programs can have a clear impact on the cognitive and linguistic competence of the children and on their social emotional behavior – even if multimodal approaches, in which high quality support at educational centers is combined with an empowerment approach for the parents, are more successful (Blok, Fukkink, Gebhardt, & Leseman, 2005; Brooks-Gunn & Markman, 2005). Nevertheless, families who are psychosocially stressed benefit specifically from the support (Gomby, 2007; Siraj-Blatchford, 2004). For this reason, effects can be expected that will for the most part be slightly positive, as described in the overview of research on the efficacy of home visiting programs (US Department of Health and Human Services, 2017). According to standards of the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) (What Works Clearinghouse, 2014), effect sizes in excess of 0.25 are substantially important and are interpreted as “qualified positive (or negative) effect” (p. 21), even if they fail to attain any statistical significance in the respective study.
In the last few years, the effectiveness of early intervention in Europe has been analysed in several studies (Jungmann, Sierau, Dähe, Dugraviert, Serbati & Lanfranchi, submitted). ZEPPELIN is one of the largest intervention studies with a long-term design (Lanfranchi & Neuhauser, 2013; Neuhauser et al., 2015). ZEPPELIN evaluates effects of the Parent as Teachers program (PAT) in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland. A trained PAT-parent educator (i.e., pediatric nurses in this study) visits families at their homes approximately two times a month until the child is three years old. Additionally, the program offers monthly group meetings. In the long term, the program strives to enhance the educational opportunities of children who are jeopardised in their development for psychosocial reasons. For the early recognition and recruitment of at-risk families around birth, an interdisciplinary network was established at the three project sites. Professionals from the medical (e.g. pediatricians, gynecologists, midwives) and psychosocial field (e.g. parent and social counseling) assessed the risk constellation using a short screening form with important risk indicators and enrolled at-risk families to the study. If migrant families met these criteria, they were explicitly addressed with the help of intercultural interpreters and included in the study. In order to recruit the projected number of 252 families and randomly assign them to the intervention and control group, a stratified block randomisation was used. Only the intervention group received home visits and participated in the group meetings. Assessments were performed at the age of 3 months (baseline data) and around the first three birthdays of the children.
The research questions are: Does early support with the "PAT-Parents as Teachers" (PAT) program have effects on the cognitive, language and social development in children aged 0 to 3 from families with psychosocial risk, and on the parental quality of caregiving? Which factors in program, family and context are related to these effects?
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - Third Edition. San Antonio, ZX: Harcourt. Blok, H., Fukkink, R. G., Gebhardt, E. C., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2005). The relevance of delivery mode and other programme characteristics for the effectiveness of early childhood intervention. International journal of behavioral development (Print), 29(1), 35-47. Bradley, R. H., & Caldwell, B. M. (1988). Using the HOME inventory to assess the family environment. Pediatric Nursing, 14(97-102). Brooks-Gunn, J., & Markman, L. B. (2005). The Contribution of Parenting to Ethnic and Racial Gaps in School Readiness. The Future of Children, 15(1), 139-168. Codreanu, N., & Engfer, A. (1984). Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur Erhebung von Einstellungen von Müttern und Kindern im Kleinstkindalter (EMKK). Universität München, Institut für Psychologie, unveröff. Forschungsbericht. Crittenden, P. M. (2008). Raising Parents: Attachment, Parenting and Child Safety. Cullompton: Willan. Crittenden, P. M. (2010). CARE-Index Infancy: Coding Manual. Unpublished manuscript, Family Relations Institute, Miami, FL. Jungmann, T., Sierau, S., Dähne, V., Serbati, S., Dugravier, R., & Lanfranchi, A. (2016). Effectiveness of early intervention and education in Europe: How do the results inform program development and dissemination? Infant Mental Health Journal, submitted. Lanfranchi, A., & Neuhauser, A. (2013). ZEPPELIN 0-3: Theoretische Grundlagen, Konzept und Implementation des frühkindlichen Förderprogramms „PAT –Mit Eltern Lernen“ Frühe Bildung, 2(1), 3-11. doi:10.1026/2191-9186/a000071 Neuhauser, A., Ramseier, E., Schaub, S., Burkhardt, S. C. A., Templer, F., & Lanfranchi, A. (2015). Hard to reach families—A methodological approach to early recognition, recruitment, and randomization in an intervention study. Mental Health & Prevention, 3(3), 79-88. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mhp.2015.07.002 Prasopkittikun, T., Tilokskulchai, F., Sinsuksai, N., & Sitthimongkol, Y. (2006). Self-efficacy in Infant Care Scale: Development and psychometric testing. Nursing & Health Sciences, 8(1), 44-50. Sidor, A., Eickhorst, A., Stasch, M., & Cierpka, M. (2012). Die Heidelberger Belastungsskala (HBS) und ihre Gütekriterien. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 61(10), 766-780. Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2004). Educational disadvantage in the early years: How do we overcome it? Some lessons from research. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 12(2), 5-20. US Department of Health and Human Services (Ed.) (2017). Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness: Model reports. Washington, DC. : Retrieved January 14, 2017, from: http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/. What Works Clearinghouse. (2014). Procedures and Standards Handbook. Version 3.0. What Works Clearinghouse. Washington, D.C: National Center for Education Evaluation.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.