I Is for Immigration: Visual Art From A Kids' Point of View
Author(s):
Barbara Veltri (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

20 SES 07 A, Inclusion and Immigration Are the Big Agendas for Welfare Professions and How Can These Aims Be Supported by Digital and Visual Media through Application of Interactivity and Art?

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-23
17:15-18:45
Room:
W3.16
Chair:
Maja Jankowska

Contribution

A “pedagogy of silence” (Epstein, 2009) pervades classrooms when Immigration is the topic of study in the history curriculum for middle schoolers. Our classrooms are increasingly diverse, but the ‘white elephant’ emerges when teachers ignore, defer, minimize, or impede meaningful opportunities for students’ expression.  Over the last five years, media and national discourse on Immigration, and its’ ancillary pejorative terms: illegal, alien, reform, border security, walls, and deportation conjure up images via social media and television, but, too often through direct personal experiences. (Time for Kids, 2015). 

         In Arizona, my home state, the Republican controlled state legislature passed Senate Bill (SB107), signed into law by former Governor, Jan Brewer (Republican), before the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that for police to pull over and demand identifcation from someone based on their ethnicity or "looks" iwas unconstitutional, (Lo Giurato, 2012). 

         In Italy, where the author lived, taught and directed a study abroad semester with 10 teacher candidates, who completed 50 hours of practice teaching in elementary in  middle schools in one city,  the term “immigration” held  levels of meaning, other than the exodus of more than 11 million Italians at the turn of the 20th century for the Americas. (Willis, 2005). 

This arts-based study, in keeping with the theme of the 2017 EERA annual meeting, acknowledges how students perceive text, images, identities, and cultural phenomena, related to Immigration based upon their “thinking,” rather than content “knowledge.” 

It considers three overriding questions: (1) Does the curriculum meaning of “immigration” differ from a kids’ point of view?  (2) Do we differentiate kids’ thinking and kids’ knowing? (3) Should we, as educators and researchers, care to make the distinction, and can that be accomplished through students' visual art?

Michael Polanyi’s (1967) research on tacit knowledge, “the belief that creative acts (especially acts of discovery) are shot-through or charged with strong personal feelings and commitments” is employed as the conceptual framework in this study, on how kids view the term, “Immigration” through their original visual art.  Polanyi (1967) termed the pre-logical phase of knowing as “tacit knowledge” and theorized that, “we can know more than we can tell.” 

     This study’s significance is timely.  Current immigration realities, issues, policies, and the rise of nationalistic movements, present a montage of images, media, and rhetoric that filter into the mainstream frame of reference. (Barber, 2016). For our most vulnerable students, words cannot express the depth of their ‘thinking,” on the construct ­of Immigration.   

         Eisner (2002) argues for connoisseurship as a way of “seeing.” How do kids “see” immigration? Why should teachers be concerned? And what can policy makers learn from the intense, passionate and policy-charged images reflected in the creations of young people? 

Method

The project begins with students receiving a cookie, shaped as the letter, I. Students brainstorm words that start with that letter: Independence, Inequality, and Information Technology might be possibilities. Data gathered over a five-year period (2010-2015) from 400 4-8th grade U.S. students (across 8 states), and 30 8th graders in a middle school history class Siena, Italy, concurred: I is for IMMIGRATION. Students' visual art designs (paper and on IPAD created as a classroom exercise) were analyzed, coded, and categorized (Glasser & Strauss, 1967). Grounded Theory was employed to analyze these data for the purpose of coding, but interpretivism, that suggests that the way we know the world is through our experiences in that world, guided the classroom strategies, designed and modeled by the author, who originated this project in her own classroom in a boy’s school in Greenwich, Connecticut, prior to her transitioning as a teacher educator. It was replicated in a middle school history classroom in Italy by a teacher who collaborated, with the author, with the stipulation that his students' visual art products be created on IPADs. The final products were shared with peers and teacher candidates, as the student/artist discussed the meaning behind their creation.

Expected Outcomes

The most profound finding came from a student in Italy (April 2014), who asked the author, in front of his teacher and peers, "You want to know that we THINK? No one ever cares about what we think. They only want, what we know and that is what we are tested on." In spite of classroom lectures by teachers and readings in textbooks on Immigration during the early 20th century (a mandated component of 4th,5th 7th, and 8th grade Social Studies curriculum in the U.S. and in the 8th grade in Italy) students tacit thinking on the term Immigration, transcended the prescribed content, and interpretation was based upon personal experiences and/or current worldview. Findings into the complex ecologies of adolescents' thinking on the topic of immigration fell into four categories: (1) cultural/experiential; (2) family of origin; (3) peer group perceptions; and (4) personal conviction. The findings conclude: (a) Students’ artwork and captions present a strong case for visual arts-based research in content-area settings; (b) Inventive ideas and schemata were generated by “in- and-out-of-school” experiences; (c) creations reflected that which is localized, personal and emotive; (d) kids’ art served as authentic literacy and social studies assessment contributing new understanding of what matters to kids, (e) kids’ visual art (crayons/paints/paper or IPAD) is expressive, detailed, personal, indicates a strong understanding of their view of the subject matter, and reflects emotional ties to the topic, and f) warrant further study and discussion in a world-wide global context and on-line forum.

References

Arizona V. United States. 567 U.S. Supreme Court of the United States. (2012). Barber, T. (July 11, 2016). A renewed nationalism is stalking Europe. The Financial Times. London: The Financial Times Limited. Eisner, E. (2002). The Arts and the creation of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Epstein, T. (2009). Interpreting National History: Race, Identity, and Pedagogy in Classrooms and Communities. NY: Routledge Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine. Kim. J.H. (2016). Understanding Narrative Inquiry. London, UK. Sage Publications, Inc. LoGiurato, B. (June, 25, 2012). The Supreme Court Just Overturned Most of the Arizona Immigration Law. Arizona: Business Insider) Polanyi, Michael (1958, 1998) Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post Critical Philosophy.London: Routledge Polanyi, Michael (1967) The Tacit Dimension, New York: Anchor Books. Time For Kids (September 11, 2015). What's Happening in Europe?: Here's what you need to know about the crisis in Europe.(Retrieved from: www.timeforkids.com.) Willis, C.A. (2005). Destination America: U.S. Immigration, When did they come? Educational Broadcasting Corporation. Willis, J. (2008). Qualitative research methods in education and educational technology. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.

Author Information

Barbara Veltri (presenting / submitting)
Northern Arizona University
Teaching and Learning
Scottsdale

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.