Transnational Networks and Connections: Academic Women at the University of New Zealand, 1921-1941
Author(s):
Tanya Fitzgerald (presenting / submitting) Judith Harford (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-22
17:15-18:45
Room:
K3.12
Chair:
Iveta Kestere

Contribution

In 1911, a Department of Home Science at the University of New Zealand (1870–1961) opened. It was the first such department in either New Zealand or Australia for the training of women. Offering courses in science, food, and nutrition and practical courses in home and institutional management, the department aimed to provide women with the necessary skills and knowledge for their intended roles as wives, mothers, and homemakers (Beaumont, 2013; Fitzgerald, 2009). Although deemed a “woman’s domain” by university administrators, the newly established department presented opportunities for women to establish their own scholarly traditions (Antler, 1987), undertake work that was intellectually respectable, professionalize the field of Home Science, create an academic community and develop transnational networks and connections. It was these social and intellectual networks and transnational connections that promoted friendships and solidarity between/among academic women, and reinforced women’s capabilities as scholars, scientists, and leaders in the field (Fitzgerald and Smyth, 2014). This paper focuses on exchange programs such as the Fulbright and Carnegie to illustrate the importance of transnational connections in forging alliances between women. Both programs offered educational exchanges that created space and motivation for talented women to travel, cultivate international networks, extend their career choices and trajectories, and develop leadership in their professional fields. As will be outlined, there is much to learn from examining points of crossover between women’s careers and educational exchange (Whitehead, 2005).

There are relatively fewer historical studies, however, that offer a nuanced understanding of how women themselves understood and exercised leadership as they took new opportunities to transform their lives and those of other women (Fitzgerald and Collins, 2011; Harford and Rush, 2010; Morris Matthews, 2003). Furthermore, this paper examines the role of US educational exchange programs as a key to understanding how women collaborated with one another at local and international levels and the extent to which participation in the Fulbright and Carnegie programs contributed to the shaping of their professional identities and their development as leaders in their field (Carter, 2002).

Feminist historians have long recognised the importance of education and travel in women’s social and political transformation (Fitzgerald and Smyth, 2014; Mackinnon, 1997; Robinson-Tomsett, 2013; Woollacott, 1998, 2010). Women such as Helen Rawson (1886–1964) and Ann Strong (dates), two of the first women professors at the University of New Zealand (1875–1957) were part of the diaspora of educated women who journeyed to new lands for the career opportunities presented. In both cases, Rawson and Strong maintained bilateral connections with women from “home” (Morris Matthews, 2003) and instigated multilateral flows of connection with other women home scientists resident in New Zealand, England, the US and Canada. 

Method

This paper will advance knowledge in several fields of historical scholarship, particularly transnational history: The paper and the underpinning project are explicitly transnational in focus. In this paper, archival data from New Zealand and the US will be used to highlight the efforts, accomplishments and reflections of women who undertook a cultural exchange program. Through an analysis of primary sources, including university records, Fulbright and Carnegie archival material archives and personal papers, it will be informed by the following research question: 1. How did academic women negotiate connections and networks across national boundaries and to what extent did participation in a cultural exchange program enhance intellectual co-operation across national boundaries? The analysis underpinning this paper pays attention to the interactive relationship between the ‘local’, ‘national’ and ‘transnational’ and to surface new understandings of the micro realities of women’s academic lives as well as the macro possibilities that transnational interactions and exchanges stimulated (Midgley, Twells, and Carlier, 2016).

Expected Outcomes

The paper offers an important contribution to transnational history Very few of the small number of existing studies of the Fulbright and Carnegie programs have recognised the gendered dimensions of academic exchange schemes, and only Whitney Walton (2012) has undertaken an in-depth study of women award-holders as a distinct group (for the French-American exchange). Over the past two decades feminist history has turned attention to the development of more transnational approaches (Curthoys and Lake, 2005).

References

Antler, J. (1987) The educated woman and professionalism: The struggle for a new feminine identity. New York: Garland Publishing Inc. Beaumont, C. (2013) Housewives and citizens: Domesticity and the women’s movement in England 1928–1964. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Carter, P. (2002) Everybody’s paid but the teacher: The teaching profession and the women’s movement. New York: Teachers College Press. Curthoys, A. and Lake, M. (eds.) (2005) Connecting worlds: History in transnational perspective. Canberra: ANU Press. Fitzgerald, T. (2009) Outsiders or equals? A history of women professors at the University of New Zealand 1911–1961. Oxford: Peter Lang. Fitzgerald, T., & Collins, J. (2011). Historical portraits of women home scientists: The University of New Zealand 1911–1947. New York: Cambria Press. Fitzgerald, T. and E.M. Smyth (eds.) (2014) Women educators, leaders and activists 1900–1950: Educational lives and international networks. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Harford, J. and Rush, C. (eds). (2010) Have women made a difference? Women in Irish Universities, 1850–2010. Oxford: Peter Lang. Mackinnon, A. (1997) Love and freedom: Professional women and the reshaping of personal life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Midgley, C., Twells, A. and Carlier, J. (2016) Women in transnational history: Connecting the local and global. New York: Routledge. Morris Matthews, K. (2003) ‘Imaging home: Women graduate teachers abroad 1880-1930’, History of Education 32(5): 529–545. Robinson-Tomsett, E. (2013) Women, travel and identity: Journeys by rail and sea 1870-1940. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Whitehead, K. ‘Vocation, career and character in early twentieth century women teachers’ work in city schools’, History of Education 34(6): 579–597. Woollacott, A. et al. (eds) (2010) Transnational lives: Biographies of global modernity, 1700–Present. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Woollacott, A. (1998) ‘Inventing Commonwealth and Pan-Pacific Feminisms: Australian Women’s Internationalist Activism in the 1920s-30s’, Gender & History 10(3): 425-448.

Author Information

Tanya Fitzgerald (presenting / submitting)
La Trobe University
Melbourne
Judith Harford (presenting)
University College, Dublin

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.