Session Information
29 SES 03 B, Drama in Education and as a Form of Critical Practice
Paper Session
Contribution
Over a decade ago thousands of Chilean people begun to take to the streets to protest against the injustices brought about by the educational system. Noted by its marked neoliberal-orientation, the Chilean educational system was strongly criticised by social movements led by secondary and tertiary level students, who demanded that education be understood as a basic universal right rather than as an individual commodity (Bellei, Cabalin, & Orellana, 2014). As a result of these protests, the system is currently undergoing structural reforms that claim to support this move away from a heavy market orientation in education (Eyzaguirre Guzmán, 2014). However, various analysts see the new policies as still grounded on neoliberal narratives (Reyes Barra, 2015). Considering that one of the tasks of critical pedagogy is to make schools “safe from the baneful influence of market logics” (Giroux & Giroux, 2006, p. 28), it seems relevant to inquire into methods that can help Chilean teachers in the application of critical pedagogy.
Critical pedagogy is an heterogeneous educational tradition that encompasses various viewpoints and practices, brought together by a shared commitment to emancipatory social change (Darder, Baltodano, & Torres, 2009). Despite critical pedagogy’s longstanding presence as an educational movement, it has been criticised for its absorption with general theorising rather than with the pragmatic reality of the classroom (McArthur, 2010). This speaks of a need to discuss critical pedagogy in a contextualised way (King-White, 2012), exploring different approaches to bring it into practice. Drama in education has been identified as one valuable site to pursue critical pedagogy’s transformative aims (Doyle, 1993; Freebody & Finneran, 2016b; Grady, 2003; O’Connor, 2013). Drama’s seemingly intrinsic goals of promoting social transformation; of establishing democratic spaces of participation, of offering a safe distance from which to analyse human issues, and of encouraging a balance between action and reflection, are all characteristics that could present invaluable potential for critical pedagogy (Freebody & Finneran, 2013). However, it is crucial that the grounds behind these apparently inherent features are subjected to thorough examination so that the drama field does not fall into stagnant assumptions (Freebody & Finneran, 2016b). While some scholarship has been developed in recent years that scrutinises this in more depth in European and international settings (Freebody & Finneran, 2016a; O’Connor, 2013), there is scarce research available that centres on a Latin American context. In addition, there seems to be a lack of investigations that focus on drama as a critical methodology for teaching and learning across the curriculum. Therefore, the central research question which this study aims to address is what are the possibilities and challenges that Chilean teachers face when trying to integrate drama in education as a form of critical pedagogy in their practices? This paper presents some of the study’s initial findings, centring on a Continuing Professional Development (CPD) programme using drama as a form of critical pedagogy undertaken by a group of teachers in a Chilean school. The paper analyses the critical pedagogical potential and challenges that these teachers faced when introduced to drama conventions originally developed by renowned European drama educators - Dorothy Heathcote, Gavin Bolton, and Jonothan Neelands. The paper also explores the ways in which learning about drama in education changed the teachers’ educational perspectives, and how the experience of the CPD programme modified and enrichened the conceptual framework of the study.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Bellei, C., Cabalin, C., & Orellana, V. (2014). The 2011 Chilean student movement against neoliberal educational policies. Studies in Higher Education, 39(3), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.896179 Darder, A., Baltodano, M., & Torres, R. D. (Eds.). (2009). The Critical Pedagogy Reader (2nd ed). New York, NY: Routledge. Doyle, C. (1993). Raising Curtains on Education: Drama as a Site for Critical Pedagogy. Westport, Conn.: Praeger. Eyzaguirre Guzmán, N. (2014, June). La Reforma Educacional Primeras Iniciativas Legislativas Presentación ante la Comisión de Educación de la Honorable Cámara de Diputados. PDF document, Valparaíso. Retrieved from http://reformaeducacional.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/presentacion_camara_diputados_02_06_2014.pdf Freebody, K., & Finneran, M. (2013). Drama and Social Justice. In M. Anderson & J. Dunn (Eds.), How Drama Activates Learning: Contemporary Research and Practice (pp. 47–63). London ; New York: Bloomsbury. Freebody, K., & Finneran, M. (Eds.). (2016a). Drama and Social Justice: Theory, Research and Practice in International Contexts. London ; New York: Routledge. Freebody, K., & Finneran, M. (2016b). Tensions and mythologies in the liminal space between drama and social justice. In M. Freebody & M. Finneran (Eds.), Drama and Social Justice: Theory, Research and Practice in International Contexts (pp. 15–29). London ; New York: Routledge. Giroux, H. A., & Giroux, S. S. (2006). Challenging Neoliberalism’s New World Order: The Promise of Critical Pedagogy. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 6(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708605282810 Grady, S. (2003). Accidental Marxists?: The Challenge of Critical and Feminist Pedagogies for the Practice of Applied Drama. Youth Theatre Journal, 17(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/08929092.2003.10012553 King-White, R. (2012). Oh Henry!: Physical Cultural Studies’ Critical Pedagogical Imperative. Sociology of Sport Journal, 29(3), 285–408. Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17(4), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807017 McArthur, J. (2010). Achieving social justice within and through higher education: the challenge for critical pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.491906 Neelands, J. (2005). Re-imaging the Reflective Practitioner: towards a philosophy of critical praxis. In J. Ackroyd (Ed.), Research Methodologies for Drama Education (pp. 15–39). Stoke-on-Trent, UK ; Sterling, USA: Trentham Books Ltd. O’Connor, P. (2013). Drama as Critical Pedagogy: Re-imagining Terrorism. In M. Anderson & J. Dunn (Eds.), How Drama Activates Learning: Contemporary Research and Practice (pp. 125–134). A&C Black. Reyes Barra, G. (2015, May 23). Reforma Educacional: Mantención de criterios neoliberales y choque de intereses. Retrieved from http://eldesconcierto.cl/reforma-educacional-mantencion-de-criterios-neoliberales-y-choque-de-intereses/
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.