Session Information
Contribution
In times of increased globalization, the national level has been challenged as the prime unit of education policy analysis, generating an increased interest not only for international policy, but also for regional and local policy making. This paper explores how municipal variations – in terms of educational and socio-economic resources, local initiatives and decisiveness – have affected municipal responses to national school reforms in the case of Sweden. The Swedish school system generally has relied on a complex balance between national, regional and local governing and responsibilities, but though municipalities always have been important school policy actors, municipality agency has been quite neglected in historical school policy research in Sweden (Roman et al., 2015).
This study is part of the comparative project ‘Who has governed the Swedish school?’ which started in 2014 and will finish 2017. The overall project aim is to compare over-time variations in balance between municipal and national school governing in different Swedish municipalities. We trace local school policy events 1950 – 2010 in three distinctly diverse municipalities (a big city, a mid-range city and a rural community). Our main research questions are: To what extent has the Swedish school been homogeneously organized and acted out? What actions have been taken to claim municipal interests, while dealing with national directives and guidelines? Which international influences are visible in the context of municipal school policy?
This paper concentrates on the materialization of the Swedish comprehensive school reform of the 1960s, focusing the planning, construction and furnishing of school buildings and school-supporting facilities ( such as audio-visual support centers, libraries etc) as a fundamental means for enabling the comprehensive school reform ideals: to introduce a highly standardized and modern school throughout the country. Design and location of school facilities was a key education policy issue during the reform period, and appears as a good case for comparing municipal variation. The national standards associated with the introduction of the comprehensive school met with a very fragmented educational landscape, affecting pace and strength of the standardization process at the municipal level. The Swedish comprehensive school reform was strongly promoted as a main road to modernity, democracy, rationality, prosperity and internationalization. Our contribution lies in the interest for these reform changes from a local point of view, taking both national and transnational education policy into account.
Theoretically our project draws on the curriculum theory tradition developed by Dahllöf (1967, 1971), Lundgren (1977, 1979, 1984) and Englund (1986/2005), focusing societal and political prerequisites for education and educational change. This structural approach though has generally emphasized the national level of schooling, with regards to policy formulation and to actual school activities and outcomes, while partly ignoring local variations. We stress the importance of historical studies of local school making, in order to produce sophisticated reform analyses. To support this theoretical claim, we relate to international research on decentralization, marketization and globalization (cf. Ball et al 2007; Hopmann 2008; Schriewer 2009; Lawn & Grek 2012). These theoretical strands constitutes an analytical framework where the historical comparison of local school policy relate to intertwined local, national and transnational policy arenas, which together constitute a complex socio-political context for local policy navigation(Nóvoa & Yariv-Mashal, 2003).
In this mainly descriptive study, we make use of the concepts of geographical asymmetry and geographical justice (partly linked to the concept of spatial justice, Soja 2010, Clement & Kanai 2015) within and between different local policy-arenas. These concepts cover fundamental infrastructural disparities between different types of geographical areas, in this case specifically referring to school buildings and educational resources.
Method
Expected Outcomes
References
Ball, S. J., Goodson, I. & Maguire, M. (red.) (2007). Education, globalisation, and new times. Oxon: Routledge. Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford University Press. Clement, D. & Kanai, M (2015). "The Detroit Future City: How Pervasive Neoliberal Urbanism Exacerbates Racialized Spatial Injustice", American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 369-385. Dahllöf, U. (1967). Skoldifferentiering och undervisningsförlopp: Komparativa mål – och processanalyser av skolsystem. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. Englund, T. (1986). Curriculum as a political problem: changing educational conceptions, with special reference to citizenship education. Diss.Uppsala University. Hopmann, S T (2008). No child, no school, no state left behind: schooling in the age of accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies 2008, Vol. 40, No. 4, 417–456. Linné, A. (2012): Läroplansteori mellan rum, tid och handling, In: Englund, T., Forsberg, E. & Sundberg, D. (red.) (2012). Vad räknas som kunskap?: läroplansteoretiska utsikter och inblickar i lärarutbildning och skola. (1. uppl.) Stockholm: Liber. Lundgren, U.P. (1972). Frame factors and the teaching process: A contribution to curriculum theory and theory on teaching (Dissertation). University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Nóvoa, A. & Yariv-Mashal, T. (2003). Comparative Research in Education: A Mode of Governance or a Historical Journey? Comparative Education, 39(4), 423-438. Popkewitz, T. Franklin, B. & Pereyra, M. (Eds) (2001). Cultural History and Education. New York: RoutledgeFalmer. Ringarp, J. (2011). Professionens problematik. Lärarkårens kommunalisering och välfärdsstatens förändring, Göteborg/Stockholm: Makadam. Román, H. (2013a). I valfrihetens tidevarv. Friskoledebatt i fullmäktige 1980-2010. In T. Nilsson (Ed.), Privatisering, miljö och EU i Stockholmspolitiken (pp. 45-86). Stockholm: Stockholmia. Román, H. (2013b). Stockholm, friskolornas huvudstad. In T. Nilsson (Ed.), Privatisering, miljö och EU i Stockholmspolitiken (pp. 87-115). Stockholm: Stockholmia. Román, H. (2014). Från folkskoleinspektion till utbildningsförvaltning. Stockholms skolförvaltning efter 1958: Svensk skola i ett kommunalpolitiskt perspektiv Stockholm: Utbildningsforvaltningen, Stockholms stad. Román, H. et al (2015). Who governs the Swedish school? Local school policy research from a historical and transnational curriculum theory perspective. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1, p. 81-94. Schriewer, J. (2011). Discourse Formation in Comparative Education, 4th,Revis edn, Peter Lang GmbH, Europaischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, Bern 9;Frankfurt am Main. Soja, Edward W. (2010). Postmodern geographies – the reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso Books. Steiner-Khamsi, G. & Waldow, F. (eds) (2012). Policy Borrowing and Lending in Education. London: Routledge. Stille, A. (2002) The Future of the Past. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.