Adadan, E., Irving, K.E. & Trundle, K. C. (2009). Impacts of multi-representational instruction on high school students’ conceptual understandings of the particulate nature of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 31(13), 1743-1775.
Ainsworth S., (2008), The educational value of multiple representations when learning complex scientific concepts, in Gilbert J. K., Reiner, M. and Nakhleh M. (ed.), Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education (pp.191–208). Springer.
Gilbert, J.K., & Treagust, D. (2009). Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. London, UK: Springer.
Gabel, D.L. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 548–554.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). ‘‘Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83.
Johnstone, A.H. (1999). The nature of chemistry. Education in Chemistry, 36(2), 45–47.
Taber, K. S. & Garcia-Franco, A. (2010). Learning processes in chemistry: Drawing upon cognitive resources to learn about the particulate structure of matter. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 99-142.
Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry ‘triplet’. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195.
Treagust, D.F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T.L. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education,25(11), 1353–1368.
Yakmaci-Guzel B. and Adadan E., (2013), Use of multiple representations in developing preservice chemistry teachers’understanding of the structure of matter. International Journal of Environment and Science Education, 8(1), 109–130.