Career intentions of doctorate holders – Which role plays the employment situation of Postdocs in academia?
Author(s):
Jens Ambrasat (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Network:
22. Research in Higher Education
Format:
Paper

Session Information

22 SES 08 C,

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-24
09:00-10:30
Room:
K5.09
Chair:
Mariana Gaio Alves

Contribution

A scientific career is associated with great uncertainties and risks. This is mainly due to the employment conditions for post-docs within academia, which in the vast majority of cases are temporary non-tenured positions. This uncertainty phase often leads to chains of temporary positions and a creeping drop-out from science. This phase bears a risk of cooling-out, insofar the interest on a scientific career decreases and/or other life goals like family or safety become more important.
On the other hand, most of the graduates know from the beginning of the doctorate which conditions a scientific career implies (Waaijer 2016). The conditions might already be priced in. In addition, there is a considerable proportion of graduate students who do not intend to stay in science and only want to use the doctor to keep or improve their opportunities on the non-academic labor market. In some subject-fields (chemistry, biology) the PhD has a significant non-academic value (dual-use character).
In the case of those who remain (after the doctorate) in science, they are by no means all planning a scientific career. There are various types of researchers of science (Rogge 2015), of which not all are seriously pursuing the goal of a scientific career. Thus, career intentions of young scientists become a decisive variable when it comes to examine and evaluating career perspectives.
The question is whether and to what extent the employment conditions have an impact on the career intentions of young researchers. And to what degree they are determined by other factors. Similarly: Which circumstances lead young researchers to leave the scientific system and to keep away from former scientific career plans? This article provides an overview of the employment situation of junior academics in the post-doc phase and shed light on its impact on their career plans.

Method

In order to investigate the relationship between the employment situation and the career prospects of young researchers, we refer to various data collected at the DZHW - the panel study of doctoral candidates and doctorate holders ProFile (Lange et al., 2016) and the DZHW scientist survey (Neufeld 2016). The data contain detailed information on the employment situation of doctorate holders, including the nature of the contracts. Participants also indicated whether they are seeking a professorship or another leading position in academia. Taking advantage of the longitudinal panel study ProFile, information about the postdocs can also be related to information about the doctoral studies, such as motives to make a PhD and the structure of the doctorate, etc.

Expected Outcomes

The data should shed light on the question which doctorate holders intend to have a scientific career and why and what role are the employment situations play in this. The results suggest that the career prospects are not primarily determined by the precarious and uncertain employment situation in science. Rather, the abandonment of the academic area is explained by preceding motives, which were already fixed at the beginning of the doctorate and which vary greatly between the subject-fields. However, against this backdrop, the effects of frustration and a suffering from uncertainty becomes visible and might lead some of the young academics lead - in a creeping process - to abandon their original career plans.

References

Auriol, Laudeline, Max Misu, and Rebecca A. Freeman. 2013. Careers of Doctorate Holders: Analysis of Labour Market and Mobility Indicators. Hauss, Kalle, Marc Kaulisch, Manuela Zinnbauer, Jakob Tesch, Anna Fräßdorf, Sibylle Hinze, and Stefan Hornbostel. 2012. Promovierende im Profil: Wege, Strukturen und Rahmenbedingungen von Promotionen in Deutschland. Ergebnisse aus dem Profile-Promovierendenpanel, Berlin. Lange, J., Lietz, A., Ambrasat, J., Tesch, J., & Wegner, A. (2016). The German Doctoral Candidates and Doctorate Holders Study ProFile. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik / Journal of Economics and Statistics. De Gruyter Oldenbourg. Open Access, Online First (ahead of print). Neufeld, J., & Johann, D. (2016). Wissenschaftlerbefragung 2016 - Methodenbeschreibung und Fragebogen. Hannover/Berlin: DZHW. http://www.forschungsinfo.de/Publikationen/Download/DZHW_WB_2016_Methoden-v1.pdf Rogge, Jan-Christoph (2015): "The Winner Takes It All? Die Zukunftsperspektiven des wissenschaftlichen Mittelbaus auf dem akademischen Quasi-Markt". In: Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Jg. 67, H. 4, S. 685-707. Waaijer, C. 2016. Perceived career prospects and their influence on the sector of employment of recent PhD graduates, Science and Public Policy, 1–12.

Author Information

Jens Ambrasat (presenting / submitting)
1German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW)
Research System and Science Dynamics
Berlin

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.