Trends in Accessibility of Literacy
Author(s):
Marjeta Doupona (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper

Session Information

09 SES 08 A, Exploring Trends and Equity with PIRLS/TIMSS

Paper Session

Time:
2017-08-24
09:00-10:30
Room:
W3.11
Chair:
Jana Strakova

Contribution

Since Coleman Report (Coleman, 1966) we know that socioeconomic factors matter. Sirin's (2005) big meta study of surveys from 1999 to 2000 showed that among all the factors, socioeconomic factors are the ones who can explain the most variance. 23 years earlier White (1982) came to similar conclusions. Due to the differences in cognitive abilities we can never achieve 100% explanation of variance. However, socioeconomic factors are not a force per se. They are manifested through availability of reading and language resources (richness of the language, disposal of reading materials, advantages of urban millieu, etc.). There are hundreds of articles proving that socio-economic factors matter (also presented at IRC and other educational research conferences). Bourdieu (1977, 1984, 1996) partly showed how reading capital is functioning in education. Further, elites in each society works through well developed mechanism which enables them to stay at power (van Dijk, 1993, 1998). When we combine these theoretical approaches we can see that a lot of things could be done if societies would be devoted to overcome the achievement differences (van Dijk, 1993). The question is: are they aware of these differences? Todd (2015) sees the main obstacle in the middle class, which is, by his opinion, interested in maintaining status quo.

The purpose of this paper is to show whether a gap between privileged and less privileged kids changes over time, and if it does, in what direction. We see from PIRLS results from 2001, 2006, and 2016 that countries’ average achievements are changing: in general the average achievement is rising. In 2001 the average achievement was 500 points. In 2011, the average achievement is much higher and it is to be expected that over time the PIRLS Scale Centerpoint of 500 points will be lower that the average achievement of every country. So in general, reading literacy of participating countries is rising, and we want to answer the question whether different social groups make differently big progress in the achievement.

Method

PIRLS data from 2001, 2006, and 2011 are used. We analyse all countries that participated in all three cycles and used parental questionnaires for collecting background data. In most countries we use the following variables: highest parental education, number of books at home, number of children books at home, location of school (urban vs. rural), the size of the town where the school is located, gender, set of motivation for reading variables, and set of home reading importance variables. Variables of reading motivation and reading importance at home are used only for interpreting results of different social groups and gender and do not contribute to social group characteristics. The study is made in two steps. First, we define different social groups for each country. The most relevant factors which define groups are to be found by exploratory analysis. For each social group in every country we assess the trend of reading achievement over time. We also compare the trend achievement by gender, and trend by social groups and gender. The analysis is done by regression analysis in IDB Analyzer.

Expected Outcomes

We expect that reading achievement for different social groups (also when controlled by gender) is not evenly distributed. Some groups make greater leaps forward than others. We would discuss these changes in reading achievement over time and compare it to the changes in the gender gap. We would then further generalise the gender gap in terms of motivational factors and gaps between social groups in terms of differences in availabilty of reading resources. Many countries try to approach improving of reading literacy through parents’ engagement. We will argue that this makes no or only a little sense. Nowadays’ parents were once students and many of them do not have adequate reading literacy, material resources (also due to lack of literacy and other knowledge which makes this argument circular), or awareness of importance of reading and knowledge. Most of them have been in school system for at least 8 years. Even if they are more mature now, they lack knowledge and awareness to teach and support their own children. Future parents are best approached through children who are students now. If countries pay more attention to things that can be changed (literacy of less privileged kids in terms of reading resources availability) and less attention to the gender of kids, more could be done for development of reading literacy in each country. Some countries are already doing it (and have a small gap in reading achievement between different social groups), and the others are not.

References

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Oxon: Routledge. (First edition in French in 1979). Bourdieu, P. (1996). Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Polity Press. Coleman, J. S. et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Mullis, I.V.S., et al. (2003). PIRLS 2001 International Report: IEA’s Study of Reading Literacy Achievement in Primary Schools Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College. Mullis, I.V.S. et al. (2007). IEA's Progress in International Reading Literacy Study in Primary School in 40 Countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College. Mullis, I.V.S. et al (2012). PIRLS 2011 International Results in Reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. Sirin, S:R: (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement. A Meta-analytic review of research 1990-2000. Review of educational research, 75(3), 417-45. Todd, E. (2015). Who is Charlie? Xenophobia and the New Middle Class. London: Polity Press.

Author Information

Marjeta Doupona (presenting / submitting)
Educational Research Institute
Ljubljana

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.