“They Never Understood My Story”. Young adults with a migration background on school failure and transitions between school and work
Author(s):
Michael Lindblad (presenting / submitting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper (Copy for Joint Session)

Session Information

07 SES 06 C JS, Overcoming School Failure & Enhancing Social Cohesion in Diverse Communities

Joint Paper Session NW 07 and NW 14

Time:
2017-08-23
15:30-17:00
Room:
K3.21
Chair:
Cath Gristy

Contribution

In international and Swedish research, there is a consensus that dropping out of school or incomplete upper secondary education are clear indicators that a young individual is at risk of future problems. School failure is a gradual process over time, with both structural and individual factors interacting, and social background greatly influences the level of education young people achieve (Rumberger & Lim 2008, McGrath 2009, Dale 2010, SOU 2013:74). There is clear trend of increasingly long, fragmented and uncertain transitions between school and work for young people in OECD countries. The yoyo pattern between education, employment, unemployment and employment has become more frequent (Walther 2006, Settersten Jr. & Ray 2010).

Sweden has, compared to other European countries, a relatively low proportion of pupils of early school leavers. In 2012, the figure stood at 7.5 percent, whereas the EU average was 12.8 per cent (Eurostat 2015). National statistics tell a different story. In 2013, almost 30 percent of all students did not complete the final grade in upper secondary school. Almost half of all pupils with a foreign background in Sweden left secondary school without complete grades. The corresponding figure for pupils with Swedish parents was 25 percent (National Agency for Education 2014).

 

Foreign background, especially in combination with parents with low education, often leads to a weaker position in the labour market, even when employed (OECD 2012, Rumbaut & Komaie 2010). The importance of the surrounding social structures, conditions and background factors have been repeatedly emphasized..

 

 

This study aims to deepen knowledge of young people with a migration background in Sweden, particularly those with non-European backgrounds, and their transitions from school to work. The focus is on young people with uncompleted upper secondary education drawing on their life stories, and exploring their perceptions and experiences around school failure, entering the labour market, and/or not being in education, employment or training (NEET).

Theoretically the study analyses individuals’ career decisions from an agency-structure perspective, drawing on careership theory, and the notions of pragmatic-rational choices, routines, turning-points and horizons of action (Hodkinson & Sparkes 1997, Hodkinson 2008), combined with theories on ‘otherness’ (Hall 1990, Anthias 2002, Balibar 2004), and the notion of socio-geographic space (Bourdieu 1999, Bourdieu & Wacquant, 1996).

The key questions were as follows:

  1. How do the young men and women describe their school years and the background behind why they did not complete their studies, as well as the period thereafter?
  2. What significance do the young attribute to informal and institutional support to facilitate the transition to work and independence?
  3. What differences, if any, are apparent from their stories and how can they be understood?
  4. What characterizes their horizons of action and how do they change over time?
  5. How do the structural conditions interact – ethnicity, class, gender, geographic location and migration – with individual agency in the transition from school to work for the young people?

Using these questions, highlighing how transitions between school and work are shaped in relation to the horizons of action that the young have access to and to investigate the interaction between individual agency and the "playing field", which consists of the surrounding social context and the structures that shape what is seen as optional, possible or impossible. The study contributes to the knowledge of young people with migration background, particularly those with a non-European background, their living conditions and the significance that social conditions and constructions of difference have for their career development in the “new” country.

Method

The methodological perspective of this study was based on narrative theory and method. Within this context, narratives are seen as an expression of an individual's experience and understanding of their social reality and how they identify, construct and position themselves in relation to the outside world. With this as a starting point, collecting people’s life stories can allow an analysis for investigating the connections and relationships between the individual narrative and the social context (Kohler Riessman 2008, Somers & Gibson 1994). Thus, biographical life stories provide opportunities to learn about the complexity of transitions for young people with a migration background, with particular interest in the importance of school failure. They also provide opportunities to understand the conditions of life that surrounds them and how they are interpreted and managed by the young (McGrath 2009). During 2011-2012, I conducted interviews on ten young women and ten young men. The first interview took place when the majority of the participants were aged 21, i.e. two years after they would normally have completed secondary education. A follow-up interview was conducted a year later, concentrating on changes that had occurred in their career and plans for the future. Twelve of the original cohort participated in the second interview. Therefore, my empirical material comprised stories from a total of thirty-two (20 plus 12) interviews with young people about their lives, school experiences and time after leaving high school, i.e. their transitions from school to work. It should be underlined that the participants probably constituted a positively biased sample as they were mainly recruited via career counsellors, and therefore did not include persons not known to the authorities. With these descriptions and reflections in focus, it was also possible to analyze socio-geographical aspects and differences, and how they affect young people’s opportunities of action. I was primarily interested in the young as actors in their lives. The longitudinal approach adopted in the study enabled analyses of changes of their horizons of action and visions of the future. Guided by the theoretical and methodological perspectives, the analytical focus was on how the young people expressed themselves about their positions, future plans, socio-geographic space and what is expressed about the migration background, turning-points, routines and learning in the different fields they participate in.

Expected Outcomes

The careers of the young people were developed in fields where they had subordinate positions, based on their family’s limited social, economic and cultural capital, and the otherness they encoun-tered. Against this background, their educational and labour market career choices are under¬stood as pragmatic-rational, enabled and limited by the resulting horizons of action. However, the nar¬ra-tives suggest that their horizons of action developed after leaving school making different pragmatic-rational choices that changed their posi¬tions. Nevertheless, career choices were often made within a bounded agency as a consequence of school failure and scarce resources. The learning taking place within the routine periods are both crucial for understanding processes of school failure and the extend¬ed period of establishment in working and adult life, and change of horizons of action and habitus. The narratives showed school failures and dropout are com¬plex and extended processes related to education and family, as well as access to power and capital. They encountered difference-making through the predominant images of 'immigration' as a social problem and by being located in a specific socio-geo¬graphic space that limited their possibilities for action. The family’s well-being was highly significant and their future was crucial to the young adults. Hence, their horizon of action also included the family’s opportunities and horizon of action, which indicates there is reason to speak of a collective horizon of action. Institutional and informal support together with young people’s agency may enable positive career development in spite of a lack of resources provided to the young, particularly if schools and other institu¬tions would provide more professional and timely support. The overall conclusion is that it would not have taken much investment of resources and effort to have prevented school failure for a large proportion of the twenty young adults in this study. That is the good news.

References

Anthias, F. (2002). ”Where do I belong? Narrating collective identity and translocational positionality”, Ethnicities Vol. 2 (4). Balibar, E. (2004). Rasismens nygranskad – ett modernt begrepps ursprung, relevans och paradoxer. I Mattsson & Lindberg (red.) Rasismer i Europa - kontinuitet och förändring: rapport från forskarseminariet 5 november 2003 Bourdieu, P. et al (1999). The Weight of the World. Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. Cambridge: Polity Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1996): An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press Dale, R. (2010). Early School Leaving. Lessons from Research for Policy Makers. NESSE: An independent expert report submitted to the European Commission. European Commission. Eurostat (2015). Early leavers from education and training. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tsdsc410&plugin=1 Hall, S. (1990). ‘Cultural Identity and Diaspora’ in J. Rutherford (ed.) Identity: Community, Culture, Difference. Lawrence & Wishart. Hodkinson, P. (2008). Understanding Career Decision-Making and Progression: Careership Revisited. London: John Killeen Memorial Lecture. Hodkinson, P & Sparkes, A. C (1997). Careership: A Sociological Theory of Career Decision Making. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 18 (1), 29-44. Kohler Riessman, C. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. London: Sage Publications McGrath, B. (2009). School disengagement and ‘structural options’ Narrative illustrations on an analytical approach. Young, vol. 17 no. 1 81-101 OECD. 2012. Education at a Glance 2012: OECD Indicators. Sweden: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/eag-2012-en. Rumbaut, R G & Komaie, G. (2010). Immigration and Adult Transitions. The Future of Children, Volume 20, Number 1, Spring 2010, pp. 43-66 Rumberger, R.W & Lim. S. A. (2008). Why Students Drop out of School: A Review of 25 Years of Research, California Dropout Research Project Report No 15. University of California Santa Barbara. http://www.cdrp.ucsb.edu/pubs_reports.htm. Settersten Jr, R. A & Ray, B. (2010). What's Going on with Young People Today? The Long and Twisting Path to Adulthood. The Future of Children, Volume 20, Number 1, Spring 2010, pp. 19-41. Skolverket [National Agency for Education] (2014). PM. Betyg och studieresultat i gymnasieskolan 2013-2014. Utbildningsstatistikenheten. Somers, M. & Gibson, G. (1994). Reclaiming the Epistemological ”Other”: Narrative and Social Constitution of Identity. In C. Calhoun: Social Theory and the Politics of Identity (37-99). Oxford: Blackwell SOU 2013:74 [The Swedish Government Official Reports]. Walther, A. (2006). Regimes of youth transitions: Choice, flexibility and security in young people’s experiences across different European contexts. Young, 14, 119–139.

Author Information

Michael Lindblad (presenting / submitting)
Umea university, Sweden

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.