Social Class in Initial Teacher Education in Ireland: Examining Formal Categorisations and Self-Classifications
Author(s):
Elaine Keane (presenting / submitting) Manuela Heinz (presenting)
Conference:
ECER 2017
Format:
Paper (Copy for Joint Session)

Session Information

07 SES 09 D JS, Gender, Social Class and Cultural Diversity

Joint Paper Session with NW 07 and NW 10

Time:
2017-08-24
13:30-15:00
Room:
K5.02
Chair:
Susann Hofbauer

Contribution

This paper is situated within the Diversity in Initial Teacher Education (DITE) in Ireland national research project.  DITE explores the socio-demographic backgrounds, career motivations and experiences with diversity of applicants and entrants to primary and post-primary ITE at undergraduate and postgraduate levels for state-funded ITE programmes in Ireland. The focus of this paper is ITE applicants’ (and/or entrants, as relevant) social class backgrounds (formal categorisations), self-classifications and related explanations.

In the context of an important policy focus of widening participation in Irish higher education (HE), recently, there is an emphasis in research about what happens next to these groups, in terms of progression to postgraduate level, employment, and the professions, including teaching (HEA, 2015). While Ireland’s school populations significantly diversified through immigration during the ‘Celtic Tiger’ years, our ITE and teaching populations have remained predominantly white, female, and of the majority ethnic and social class groupings (Authors, 2015, 2016). In Ireland’s latest national access plan (HEA, 2015), there is a commitment to improving the participation of national HE target groups in Irish ITE, including those from lower socio-economic groups. The small amount of research on social class in ITE in Ireland points to the over-representation of higher socio-economic and Farming groups (Greaney, Burke, and McCann 1987), especially amongst primary ITE populations (Killeavy 1998; Drudy et al. 2005), and of the Manual Skilled and Farmers groups at post-primary level (Heinz, 2013). The recent restructuring of Irish ITE has included the extension to four years for undergraduate programmes and two years for postgraduate programmes. Coinciding with this change, Authors (2015) identified a statistically significant decrease in those from lower socio-economic groups entering postgraduate post-primary ITE programmes between 2013 and 2014.

Research has shown that working class teachers can positively impact working class pupils through emphasising high expectations, questioning the role of education in reproducing class-based inequalities (cf. Maguire, 1999, 2001, 2005; Burn, 2001), and having more social justice-oriented teaching motivations than others (cf. Authors, 2017; Keane, 2016). However, research also suggests that working class students ‘battle’ their way through ITE and into the teaching workplace, experiencing significant discontinuities in joining the middle class teaching profession (cf. Maguire, 1999; 2001; 2005; Burn, 2001).

The need to continue tracking the participation of socio-economic groups in ITE over time is clear. For Hall and Jones (2013), class is an important and yet invisible force shaping teachers’ early professional experiences. Understanding their self-classifications and related explanations is also important given that pre-service teachers lack understanding about their class (and ethnic) positionality and implications for teaching diverse groups (Mueller and O’Connor, 2007; Allard and Santoro, 2006).

Specifically, we will address the following research questions:

1)      What are the social class backgrounds of ITE applicants, entrants and non-entrants in Ireland?

2)      What social class groups are over- or under-represented in relation to the Irish and the general HE populations?

3)      Do ITE application outcomes differ by social class background?

4)      How do ITE entrants self-classify in terms of social class categorisations, and how do they explain these self-classifications? 

Method

Our main data collection method is an anonymous voluntary cross-sectional online questionnaire which we are implementing on an annual basis with applicants to all state-funded ITE programmes across Ireland as part of the Irish Research Council-funded DITE national research project. All ITE applicants are invited (via email) to participate in the questionnaire at the pre-offer stage. An anonymous tracking system facilitates the tracking of respondents to ascertain application outcomes (ITE programme offer accepted or not accepted or no ITE programme offer). In this paper we present findings from our 2014 survey implementation which achieved response rates of above 32% of applicants and 41% of entrants (total number of survey respondents in 2014 = 2,289), and subject to the completion of the analysis (the funded-period of the project has ended), we will also include data from the 2015 cohort. The DITE questionnaire consists of 79 items measured through categorical and continuous scales, as well as some open-ended items. A number of items relate to social class, including socio-economic group and social class (Central Statistics Office (2012) classifications), social class self-classifications, family education, HE entry route and experience with ‘other’ groups. Socio-economic group was coded using the respondents’ parents’ occupations (current or last occupation) (CSO, 2012, Appendix 7), and this measure is prioritised over the broader CSO social class categorisation to facilitate comparison of findings with HEA data, which only include socio-economic group of higher education entrants. The self-classification question asked respondents how they would categorise themselves (options were: working class, lower middle class, upper middle class, upper class, none of the above) and to provide an explanation for their answer.

Expected Outcomes

Building on our 2015 article (Authors, 2015) which presented findings on the socio-demographic (including socio-economic) profile of 2013 and 2014 postgraduate post-primary entrants, in this paper we will explore undergraduate primary and postgraduate post-primary cohorts (all applicants, entrants and non-entrants) in 2014 in relation to: • The socio-economic profile (using CSO categories) of applicants compared to entrants (and, thus, non-entrants); • The social class self-classifications of entrants, and their explanations for this self-classification; and • Their family education level, HE entry route and experience with ‘other’ groups. Key findings from the 2014 cohort analysis will be presented, including the highest represented socio-economic groups in each cohort, comparisons of the representation of groups across the various cohorts, and patterns of over-, under- and proportional representation relative to general HE and general Irish populations. Additionally, any significant differences between entrants and non-entrants (and, thus, significant differences with regard to ITE application outcomes/success) within cohorts in relation to the socio-economic profile will be identified. Additional factors relating to social class and education will be examined for the various groups, including family education, HE entry route, and experiences with ‘other’ groups. Respondents’ self-classifications will also be examined (in terms of how they self-categorised in relation to working class, lower middle class, upper middle class, upper class, or ‘none of the above’) and compared across cohorts. Of those who explained their self-classification, key themes in relation to respondents’ perceptions of the markers of social class will be examined. Further, their reactions to such classifications (a continuum ranging from acceptance to ambivalence to rejection, with the latter revealing key themes relating to their perceptions of class identity and their relevance) will be explored. Analysis of the 2015 cohort (2015/2016 academic year applicant group) is still underway. Subject to the completion of the analysis we will also include the relevant 2015 cohort findings.

References

•Allard, A., and N. Santoro. 2006. “Troubling Identities: Teacher Education Students’ Constructions of Class and Ethnicity.” Cambridge Journal of Education 36 (1): 115–129. •Burn, E. 2001. ‘Battling through the System: A Working Class Teacher in an Inner-city Primary School’. International Journal of Inclusive Education 5 (1): 85–92. •Drudy, S., Martin, M., Woods, M., and O’Flynn. J. 2005. Men and the Classroom: Gender Imbalances in Teaching. London: Routledge. •Greaney, V., A. Burke, and J. McCann. 1987. “Entrants to Primary Teacher Education in Ireland.” European Journal of Teacher Education 10 (2): 127–140. •Hall, D. and Jones , L. 2013. ‘Social class (in)visibility and the professional experiences of middle-class novice teachers’, Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 39(4), 416-428 •Heinz, M. 2013. ‘The Next Generation of Teachers: An Investigation of Second-level Student Teachers’ Backgrounds in the Republic of Ireland’. Irish Educational Studies 32 (2): 139–156. •Higher Education Authority (2015) National Plan for Equity of Access to Higher Education 2015-2019, Dublin: HEA •Keane, E. 2016. ‘Being altruistically motivated: The postgraduate and career motivational orientations of access students at an Irish university’, Cambridge Journal of Education, DOI: 10.1080/0305764X.2016.1221886 •Killeavy, M. 1998. The Professional Development of Primary Teachers. Unpublished PhD diss., Trinity College Dublin. •Maguire, M. 1999. ‘A Touch of Class: Inclusion and Exclusion in Initial Teacher Education’. International Journal of Inclusive Education 3 (1): 13–26. •Maguire,M. 2001. ‘The Cultural Formation of Teachers’ Class Consciousness: Teachers in the Inner City’. Journal of Education Policy 16 (4): 315–331. •Maguire, M. 2005. ‘‘Not Footprints behind but Footsteps Forward’: Working Class Women who Teach’. Gender and Education 17 (1): 3–18. •Mueller, J., and C. O’Connor. 2007. ‘Telling and Retelling about Self and ‘Others’: How Pre-service Teachers (Re)Interpret Privilege and Disadvantage in One College Classroom’. Teaching and Teacher 23 (6): 840–856.

Author Information

Elaine Keane (presenting / submitting)
National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
Manuela Heinz (presenting)
National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

Update Modus of this Database

The current conference programme can be browsed in the conference management system (conftool) and, closer to the conference, in the conference app.
This database will be updated with the conference data after ECER. 

Search the ECER Programme

  • Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
  • Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
  • Search for authors and in the respective field.
  • For planning your conference attendance, please use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference and the conference agenda provided in conftool.
  • If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.