Session Information
ERG SES C 01, ICT and Education
Paper Session
Contribution
Currently, we live in the Information and Knowledge Society (Castells, 2000, 2011) that demands, a greater literacy of its citizens and allows for personal and professional development (Cantabrana, Minguell & Tedesco, 2015). Education and therefore, literacy must include not only reading, writing and calculus, but also the inclusion of digital and socio-civic skills. Nowadays, citizens use digital technologies to better develop themselves in civic participation (Culver and Jacobson, 2012), as corroborated with the social movements aided by digital social networks. However, findings show that youth do not feel included in the formal and traditional frames of participation i.e. affiliation to an institution a political party and so on, (Benedicto, 2016) and strive to broaden the concept, incorporating new means of communication (LSE Entreprise, 2013). Wireless digital technologies and Internet social networks have had a fundamental role when it comes to disseminating images and messages, creating platforms for dialogue; In addition, to convening and coordinating participatory and transformative actions of society (Buckingham & Rodríguez, 2013; Castells, 2012). In short, the use and dissemination of information and communication technologies favour democratization and can increase civic participation and the autonomy of a civic society, paving the way for democracy. To be able to achieve this, educational institutions and universities, as well as, non-formal settings such as youth centres and associations, should provide access to digital technologies and train (or alphabetize) young people as educated, responsible and critical citizens and show that knowledge is a necessary condition for the full development of democracy. Digital citizenship has become a priority for formal, non-formal and informal education institutions, which consider the incorporation of ICT as a teaching and learning strategy for students to live and work in the 21st century (Ribble, Bailey & Ross, 2004; Culver & Jacobson, 2012). Taking this into account, it is necessary to understand not only the current state of youth and the development of digital and socio-civic competences and how they influence youth civic participation, but also what educational practises and settings favour said development. This project seeks to empower citizens, especially youth, in terms of participation, solidarity, cooperative work and action for the benefit of others and the educational processes constitute an important part in the development of the necessary multiliteracies (Cope & Kalantzis, 2009, UNESCO, 2011; 2016) and competences to change the existing exclusion, inequality and social injustice. Finally, the expected outcomes of the study intend to show the differences in formal and non-formal educational settings and propose the curricular basis for developing Digital Citizenship Education for educators, with the desire or contributing to both digital and civic literacy fields.
Method
The research follows both quantitive and qualitative methodology. The first study, intends to develop and validate an online questionnaire measuring specific dimensions of digital and socio-civic competence (UNESCO, 2006; European Commission, 2011; Ferrari, 2013; Ang, 2016) in order to, afterwards, conduct a statistical correlation study, complemented with in-depth interviews and focus groups to research how these skills influence each other and the importance that they present to foster civic participation. Finally, the third study intends to develop an action-based research to develop pedagogical aspects and curricular content for formal and non-formal educational settings.
Expected Outcomes
The research findings aim to present corroborating data on the theoretical constructs of digital and socio-civic as well as providing further evidence towards developing 21st centaury skills (van Laar et al., 2017) and the current state of youth in regards to their development. In addition, to comparing and contrasting them in different European countries. Furthermore, the findings may also indicate relevant information on digital habits and trends for fostering civic participation amongst youth, in order to recommend new forms of participation. Finally, the expected outcomes of the study intend to show the differences in formal and non-formal educational settings and propose the curricular basis for developing Digital Citizenship Education for educators, with the desire or contributing to both digital and civic literacy fields.
References
Ang, C.S. (2016). Assessment of social competence: exploring the dimensions of young adult social competence. Journal Psikologi Malaysia 20 (1) pp. 90-101 Area Moreira, M. (2014). La alfabetización digital y la formación de la ciudadanía del siglo XXI. Revista Integra Educativa, 7(3), 21-33. Benedicto, J. (2016). La ciudadanía juvenil: Un enfoque basado en las experiencias vitales de los jóvenes. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 14 (2), pp. 925-938. Buckingham, D.; Rodríguez,C. (2013). "Learning about power and citizenship in an online virtual world", Comunicar, Vol.40, pp.49-58. Cantabrana, J.L.; Minguell, M.E. & Tedesco, J.C. (2015) Inclusion and social cohesion in a digital society. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12 (2), 44-58. Castells, M. (2000). The Information Age: economy, Society and Culture, Ed. (3) Oxford:Blackwell. Castells, M. (2011). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society, and culture (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons. Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2009). "Multiliteracies": New Literacies, New Learning. Pedagogies: International Journal, 4 (3), 164-195 Culver, S. H. & Jacobson, T. (2012). Media Literacy as a method to foster civic participation. Comunicar, XX (39), 73-80. European Commission (2006) European Recommendation on Key Competences. Official Journal of the European Union, L394. December 18th 2006 Ferrari, A.(2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. IPTS. Luxemburg:EU Hernández-Martín, A. & Iglesias Rodríguez, A. (2017). La importancia de las competencias digitales e informacionales para el desarrollo de una escuela intercultural. Interaçóes. 44 (1), 205-232. Hernández, E.; Robles, M.C. & Martínez, J.B. (2013). Jóvenes interactivos y culturas cívicas: sentido educativo, mediático y político del 15M. Revista Comunicar. 40 (20), 59-67. LSE ENTERPRISE. (2013). EACEA 2010/03: Youth participation in Democratic life. Final Report. Pérez-Escoda, A., García-Ruíz, R. & Aguadad, I. (2016). International dimensions of media literacy in a connected world. Applied Technology and Innovations, 12 (2), pp. 95-2106 Ribble, M.S., Bailey, G.D. & Ross, T.W. (2004). Digital Citizenship: Addessing Appropiate Technology Behaviour. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32 (1), 7-11. UNESCO, 2011. Media and Information Literacy, Curriculum for Teachers. UNESCO publications: New York UNESCO (2016). ICT skills and standards from a pedagogical perspective: levels of attainment in teaching practises. UNESCO Publications:Canada. Van-Laar, E., van-Deursen, A. J. A. M., van-Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in human behavior, 72, 577-588.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.