11 SES 07, Students Perceptions of School
The focus on this paper is how parents see the situation of male kindergarten teachers in Austria.
This research is part of a FWF-sponsored research at the university of innsbruck called "public fathers - men in the pedagogical work with children" with Josef Christian Aigner (2012). This part had the focus on parents, the others had the focus on the male kindergartenteachers, the situation in Austria and the vocational training of male kindergartenteachers. So this total research had a big range of perspectives.
The fraim of this research has three theoretical domains. The perception of parents on the ability and competences of male kindergarten teachers should always be related with these three approaches: Historicality, Gender and Professionalism.
First this should shown in a historical way up to the present age. This includes anthropological details (e.g. the situation of paedagogics in greece during the ancient times up to Rousseau, Froebel and Korczak). Male Kindergartenteachers are not that foreign species as some people think. A historical view shows a lot of male representatives in the pedagogics.
Nevertheless the profession of kindergartenteacher is a female occupation. So the second focus of this research is on gender and the abilities of men and women in education.Up to the concept of "Geistige Mütterlichkeit" (Henriette Schrader-Breymann) it is important to analyse the ability and skills of education from a gender perspective. Is it necessary to be a woman to understand and educate/teach children? A historical view about the women role in the education and the development and change during the last years shows the necessity of men AND women in the education.
The third focus and relation to male kindergartenteachers is professionalism. It is necessary not only to talk about the number of male kindergartenteachers. The important thing is to register that male (and female) kindergartenteacher work in a professional way. To see this occupational field in a professional context, the EPIK-model (Schratz, 2011) was used to analyse the parental reactions and their statements about the effect of male kindergartenteachers. The EPIK-model includes five domains: reflection, teamwork, personal mastery, the ability of difference and the awareness of profession.
So the main issue in the research was to ask, how parents feel during thinking about male kindergartenteachers and what is their opinion about suitability of male kindergartenteachers. For this empirical research parents had been asked with questionnaires and interviews because parents play such a pivotal role in their daily interactions. The statements of them were reflected with historical and latest considerations on the field of suitability and professionalism.
The analysis of the parental statements took place in international conext, too. To draw comparisons there were sifted studies from germany (Cremers & Krabel, 2012; Krabel, 2006), england (Cameron, 1999) and Norway (Emilsen, 2012). At least this empirical research compares results with historical, gender and professionalism contexts, but also with findings of other studies in europe.
This research is an empirical research with a mixed methods design. After examination european studies and collaborate in the FWF-project it was important for an extensive view to do a mixed methods design. The first step was the quanitative method of questionnaire (n=143). This survey was analyzed with SPSS and for the significance it was uses the Mann-Whitney-U-Test and the Kruskal-Wallis-Test. Following the qualitative methode was guided interviews (=27). The analysis was done with qualitative content analysis (Mayring). The categories are experiences with male kindergarten teachers, the importance of gender in the education, emotions of parents with male kindergarten teachers, possible dangerous, activities of male kindergarten teachers, differences between male and female kindergarten teachers, types of male kindergarten teachers and other matters. It was difficult to combine results from two different methods. So the combination was the comparison of the sampling and the qualitative and quantitative results and to analyse the differences and the equality of results. The random sampling have been parents which had or had not experience with male kindergartenteacher. The focus was, that there are representative parents from small/big kindergartens, from kindergartens from town/country, from public and private kindergartens, kindergartens with special pedagogical tendency and parents which are older/younger and different conditions.
A central finding of the study is that parents are primarily satisfied with males in kindergartens (e.g. bringing in other aspects, promoting the development of identity, breaking down role stereotypes), but also express minor reservations (e.g., undertaking certain duties; parents’ initial surprise during first encounters). Another result is, that parents see the necassery of male kindergarten teachers. But they don´t realize their whole professionalism. There are domains which notice parents a lot (like teamwork or the personal mastery), but there are also domains which are not realized that much. These results demonstrate the need for adequate acting and re-acting of female and male professionals as well as the need for further consideration of professionalisation within this field of education
Aigner, J. C. & Rohrmann, T. (Hrsg.). (2012). Elementar - Männer in der pädagogischen Arbeit mit Kindern. [Abschlussbe-richt des FWF-Forschungsprojekts P 20621-G14 "Public fathers" - Austrian's male workforce in child care (2008 - 2010)]. Opladen: Budrich. Cameron, C., Moss, P. & Owen, C. (1999). Men in the nursery. Gender and caring work (1. publ). London: Chapman. Cremers, M., Höyng, S., Krabel, J. & Rohrmann, T. (Hrsg.). (2012). Männer in Kitas. Leverkusen: Budrich, Barbara. Cremers, M. & Krabel, J. (2012). Männer in Kitas. Aktueller Forschungsstand in Deutschland. In M. Cremers, S. Höyng, J. Krabel & T. Rohrmann (Hrsg.), Männer in Kitas (S. 131-150). Opladen [u.a.]: Budrich. Emilsen, K. (2012). Mehr Männer in norwegischen Kindergärten. Politische und strategische Rekrutierungsmaßnahmen - ein voller Erfolg? In M. Cremers, S. Höyng, J. Krabel & T. Rohrmann (Hrsg.), Männer in Kitas. Opladen [u.a.]: Budrich. Friebertshäuser, B. (Hrsg.). (2003). Handbuch qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft (Studienausg). Weinheim: Juventa-Verl. Kuckartz, U. (2012). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung (1. Aufl). Weinheim, Bergstr: Juventa. Mayring, P. (2001). Combination and Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2 (1). Verfügbar unter http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/download/967/2111 Mayring, P. (1985). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Beltz; Deutschland; Germany; Weinheim. Sachße, C. (1994). Mütterlichkeit als Beruf. Sozialarbeit, Sozialreform und Frauenbewegung 1871-1929 (2., überarb. Aufl.). Opladen: Westdt. Verl. Schratz, M. (Hrsg.). (2011). Pädagogische Professionalität: quer denken - umdenken - neu denken. Impulse für next practice im Lehrerberuf (1. Aufl.). Wien: Facultas.wuv. Schratz, M. (2011). Professionalität und Professionalisierung von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern in internationaler Perspektive. In M. Schratz (Hrsg.), Pädagogische Professionalität: quer denken - umdenken - neu denken. Impulse für next practice im Lehrerberuf (1. Aufl., S. 46-94). Wien: Facultas.wuv. Tenorth, H.-E. (1992). Geschichte der Erziehung. Einführung in die Grundzüge ihrer neuzeitlichen Entwicklung (Grundla-gentexte Pädagogik). Weinheim: Juventa Verlag.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.