30 SES 06 A, Learning and Teaching Related to Sustainable Consumption
Since 2001, researches on the reduction of educational inequalities have been carried out in the French-speaking world by sociologists and educationalists belonging to the RESEIDA network. This work has helped to unify and consolidate a common and original approach that can be described as a relational and contextual approach to the production of inequalities and, more broadly, to school practices (Rochex & Crinon, 2011).
Such an approach consists in particular of analyzing the cognitive stakes of school tasks and the way pupils apprehend them. Thus, the term "secondarization" has been used to refer to the process of moving from one type of text (Bakhtin, 1984) to another, for example from a familiar register to a scientific register. Such a socio-historical perspective of language activities (Bernié, 2002, Jaubert, 2007) also makes it possible to say that individuals communicate to the audience how they position themselves with respect to particular discourse genre. Thus, disciplinary teaching can be perceived as a mean to integrate into a disciplinary discursive community (Jaubert, 2007). Allowing students to avoid misunderstandings by ensuring that they have access to the real learning issues therefore becomes a priority for reducing educational inequalities (Kahn, 2010).
To consider teaching in this way is fully in line with the goals of education for sustainable development (ESD). Indeed, such an education makes it possible to work Goal 4 of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: « Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifefong learning opportunities for all ». It also helps to ensure that students identify correctly the key competencies for sustainability, namely the systems thinking competency, the anticipatory competency, the normative competency, the strategic competency, the collaboration competency, the critical thinking competency, the self-awareness competency and the integrated problem-solving competency (UNESCO, 2017).
The research we have been conducting since 2015 is therefore aimed at highlighting the processes of “secondarization” in the teaching of the human and social sciences. It focuses on the following three research questions:
- What are the modes of acting-talking-thinking (Jaubert, 2007) implemented in the observed geography (and history) lessons?
- What skills does ESD work?
- What is the influence of the research system on the professional development of teachers?
The chosen methodology is of the Lesson Study type (Miyakawa & Winslow, 2009, Lewis & Hurd, 2011). It aims to improve the learning of all students and to enable the professional development of teachers. More specifically, it is to collectively prepare a lesson (called a research lesson), to teach it under peer observation in a first class, to analyze it, then to teach it again in another class. The process can be repeated until the research lesson is satisfactory and can be disseminated. The interest of the approach consists in being able to reiterate the teaching of a lesson, which allows the group to vary possible parameters and thus to be better aware of the impact of the professional choices related to the learning of the students. It also allows to analyze in depth what students do (or do not do) when conducting activities. The group we are interested in in this communication has been working during 2016-2017. It consisted of two teacher-researchers, one assistant and two partner teachers. Twelve two-hour sessions were planned for the year and several types of data were collected: the research lessons were filmed and transcribed in full, the preparation sessions were filmed. We also collected the written preparations of the lessons, the documents produced by the students, the notes taken by the observers of the research lessons (via the LessonNote software) as well as various written productions of the participants. From the data from the research lessons, we first constructed a synopsis of each of them. These synopses constitute a first level of analysis, because they give an overview of the temporal division and the activities carried out.
The geography lesson being researched covered the production and consumption sector and worked on the following objectives (primary level, students aged 10-12): - Differentiation between a producer, a distributor and a consumer based on a production chain. - Identification of the scales concerned or to be taken into account according to the problematic (local, regional, national, continental and global). Our results highlight that certain tasks are more favorable than others to bring out a questioning on the production and consumption chain from a systemic perspective. They also show that when the teacher clearly announces the learning issue, it is easier for students to move from a first discourse register to a second discourse register. Finally, they highlight an effect on the professional development of teachers as they become aware of the importance of peer collaboration in order to make good didactic choices.
Bakhtine, M. (1984). Esthétique de la création verbale. Paris: Gallimard. Bernié, J.-P. (2002). L'approche des pratiques langagières scolaires à travers la notion de communauté discursive; un apport à la didactique comparée. Revue Française de pédagogie (141), 77-88. Jaubert, M. (2007). Langage et construction de connaissances à l'école. Un exemple en sciences. Bordeaux: Presses universitaires de Bordeaux. Kahn, S. (2010). Pédagogie différenciée. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Education. Lewis, C. C. & Hurd, J. (2011). Lesson study step by step. How Teacher Learning Communities Improve Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Miyakawa, T. & Winslow, C. (2009). Un dispositif japonais pour le travail en équipe d'enseignants: étude collective d'une leçon. Education & Didactique, 3 (1), 77-90. Rochex, J.-Y. & Crinon, J. (Eds.). (2011). La construction des inégalités scolaires. Au coeur des pratiques et des dispositifs d'enseignement. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes. UNESCO (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals. Learning Objectives. Paris: UNESCO.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.