Session Information
18 SES 12 A, Exploring Health and Learning in Physical Education
Paper Session
Contribution
Within physical education (PE) scholarship decision-making seem to be a recurring theme. Some examples are "PE engagement" literature (e.g. Enright & O'Sullivan, 2010; Howley & Tannehill, 2014), where decision-making is surrounded by terms such as agency, student voice and choice, and empowerment. "Game sense" literature (e.g. Harvey & Jarrett, 2014; Light, Harvey, & Mouchet, 2014), where decision-making is concerned with strategy, tactics and thinking. Or literature discussing and conceptualizing teaching styles (e.g. Jaakkola & Watt, 2011; Mosston & Ashworth, 2002), where decision-making is a variable that teachers can adjust up or down to provide different experiences for students. While decision-making thereby seem central within different "themes" of PE scholarship, it nevertheless seem that relatively little attention has been directed towards how decision-making and learning are related to one another in PE in practice. In the paper we argue that we need more knowledge about how students make decisions or why their decisions might lead to learning in PE lessons. The broad purpose of this paper is to address this by considering the relationship between decision-making and learning in more detail. Specifically, we propose a methodology that provides a theoretical framing along with procedures enabling the investigating of this relationship between decision-making and learning.
Method
The methodology we propose in the paper is based on the work of American pragmatist John Dewey, and mainly from some of his ideas about how individual organisms learn within social and cultural context (Dewey, 1910/1997, 1916/1980, 1938). The reason for limiting our discussion of Deweyan ideas to those regarding learning as an individual process, rather than the wider social and cultural aspects of the learning process for which Dewey might be most famous, has to do with the purpose of the paper. The purpose being to utilize Deweyan ideas and concepts to conceptualize the relationship between decision-making and individual learning and to propose procedural consequences of this framing. Consequences that in turn can provide guiding principles for the selection of procedures and methods that potentially can be useful for researchers wanting to produce empirical material about individual students decision-making within their individual learning processes.
Expected Outcomes
The paper aims to provide a theoretical framing of the relationship between decision-making and individual learning, along with discussions about the implications of this framing for research and researchers wanting to investigate decision-making and learning from the student perspective. The paper furthermore include the proposal of specific research methods in order to do such research. By also providing an example from an ongoing investigation, the paper in addition tries to illustrate the types of data that can be generated through this methodology.
References
Dewey, J. (1910/1997). How we Think: Dover publications Inc. Dewey, J. (1916/1980). Democracy and education (Vol. 9 1916): Southern Illinois University Press. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Kappa Delta Pi. Enright, E., & O'Sullivan, M. (2010). 'Can I do it in my pyjamas?' Negotiating a physical education curriculum with teenage girls. European Physical Education Review, 16(3), 203-222. doi:10.1177/1356336x10382967 Harvey, S., & Jarrett, K. (2014). A review of the game-centred approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(3), 278-300. Howley, D., & Tannehill, D. (2014). " Crazy Ideas": Student Involvement in Negotiating and Implementing the Physical Education Curriculum in the Irish Senior Cycle. Physical Educator, 71(3), 391. Jaakkola, T., & Watt, A. (2011). Finnish physical education teachers’ self-reported use and perceptions of Mosston and Ashworth’s teaching styles. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30(3), 248-262. Light, R. L., Harvey, S., & Mouchet, A. (2014). Improving ‘at-action’decision-making in team sports through a holistic coaching approach. Sport, Education and Society, 19(3), 258-275. Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2002). Teaching physical education (5th ed.). San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.