European countries and the European Union have placed career learning or career management skills (CMS) high on their policy agendas during the last decades, both out of economic-competitive and social reasons (Bengtsson 2016; Council of the European Union 2008; Sultana 2012). A common, overriding aim is to promote employability of young people and self-knowledge, self-empowerment and self-assessment in order to take informed decisions about their careers (Bengtsson 2016:57). CMS have emerged as a curriculum content (Guiscard 2001; Gysbers 2013; Sultana 2012), the framing of which differs across Europe. CMS can be taught as a separate subject, as a compulsory theme across the curriculum, as extra-curricular activities, or as a combination of two or more of these. The career learning curriculum may stress ‘learning for work’ (coping skills), and ‘learning about work’, i.e. critical self-understanding in relation to working life (Sultana 2012).
Framed by a highly decentralized and marketized context, CMS in Sweden constitutes an interesting case. The private school sector has expanded immensely, particularly at upper secondary level, having been almost non-existent before the 1990s. The far-reaching decentralization and marketization have resulted in large local variations with regard to career guidance, and more generally have led to greater inequality of opportunities for young people (Lundahl & Olofsson, 2014). In Sweden, career learning is school based but does not have a designated place in the formal curriculum. According to the national curriculum guide, the whole school is responsible for giving students support for their career choices, but several evaluations (e.g. Lovén 2015; Schools Inspectorate 2013) indicate that this happens very seldom. Also the connections between school and work have tended to become weakened over time rather than the reverse. Fewer and fewer compulsory schools offer work experience, and other forms of systematic collaboration between schools and working life have vanished as well (SOU 2015:97). Instead an informal arena has emerged in the decentralized and market-oriented Swedish educational system with a number of actors that try to convince young people to make the ‘right’ or ‘best’ career decisions (c.f. Lidström et al. 2014; Lundahl & Nilsson 2009; Skolverket 2013). However rather little is known of the resulting informal curriculum of career learning and its major sources. Our study focuses contents, methods and activities that have a clear intention to influence career learning. We also find it important to consider schools´ varying profiles, catchment areas and target groups when analyzing career counselling and education (c.f. Foskett (2008).
Our aim is to contribute to the knowledge about the informal curriculum of career learning in the decentralized and marketized Swedish education system. RQs: What are the contents and activities of this curriculum? To what extent do school actors (career counsellors, teachers, others) form it, and to what degree are external actors involved (and which)?
The analysis of the curriculum contents builds on Bernstein´s (2000) theory on vertical and horizontal knowledge and pedagogical discourses – singular, based on traditional disciplines and school subjects, regional, and generic discourses. More than the two first discourses, the generic discourse has developed outside of education and has a close connection to the change of working life, and young people’s employability and flexibility. The extent to which career learning is integrated in or separated from other school subjects (classification), reflects power and status conditions between different knowledge contents that are crucial in our analysis. Furthermore, we want to analyze the counsellor’s or teacher’s control over the transmission of career knowledge, i.e. the strength of framing (Bernstein 2000).