Research question and theoretical perspective:The research literature in Physical Education (PE) is placing a growing focus on the need for research that can illuminate what pupils’ learn in PE, and how we can develop PE to become more relevant as a learning subject. In PE research, the focus has often been on the content (curriculum) and the teaching of the subject (Kirk et al., 2006), and relatively few empirical studies have covered what students learn in PE practice and how they do this (Quennerstedt et al., 2014).
With the goal of facilitating more and better learning in PE, various pedagogical models, such as sport education and teaching social and personal responsility, have been developed (Dyson, Kulinna, & Metzler, 2016). The Activist approach to PE is one of the more recent developed models (Oliver & Kirk, 2015). The approach was originally developed to meet the needs of girls that disengaged from PE, but has later been applied on all kind of pupils, including boys in all-boys settings (Luguetti et al., 2017).
Maintaining that knowledge is produced both by collaboration and by action, the activist approach holds that merely documenting current reality is no longer sufficient to understand how to better engage students in PE. Accordingly, activist researchers deliberately focus on studying not current realities, but future possibilities, by collaborating with participants to find room for change. These scholars work from the belief that social transformation begins at the micro level in localized contexts (Oliver and Kirk 2015, 2). The activist research approach to PE is based on four critical elements: a student-centred pedagogy, critical study of embodiment, inquiry-based PE centred in action, and listening and responding to girls over time (Oliver and Kirk 2015, 2016).
The purpose of this paper is to study how a new pedagogical model in PE (the Activist approach) can contribute to pupils’ embodied learning.
Embodiment is one of the critical elements of the activist approach to physical education. Both in earlier research on this model (e.g. Oliver & Lalik, 2004) and in other critical research on embodiment in PE (e.g. Azzarito & Katzew, 2010) the object of investigation has been how different discursive constructs relating to body image, PE, movement and exercise are embodied by students. However, the concept embodiment take on different meanings both between and within scholarly disciplines (Cheville, 2005). In addition to the critical, sociological approach commonly used in PE research, embodiment has also been given a more phenomenological understanding for instance in literature seeking to justify the inclusion of PE into the school curriculum (e.g. Stolz, 2014). Also, the original work of Whitehead on physical literacy has employed a phenomenological understanding of embodiment. The phenomenological approach emphasizes the subjective, lived experience of the body. There is, however, limited empirical research concerning embodiment from a phenomenological perspective in PE (Standal & Engelsrud, 2013).
These two perspectives on embodied learning and embodiment (i.e. the discursive and the lived) may been seen as either competing or as complementary. The present research, however, seeks to uncover embodied learning and embodiment from both of the perspectives.