Meeting the demand for STEM workers – that is, for employees with a science, technical engineering or mathematics background – has been a high priority across the European Union (EU). There is widespread concern that the potential lack of sufficient STEM labour supply may hinder future economic development and reduce the economic competitiveness of the EU. This presentation looks at adolescents’ career plans and their correlates to better understand why men are more likely than women to study STEM subjects and enter the corresponding jobs.
Within different cultural contexts, educational and career decisions are anchored in the choices students and their families make in adolescence. Therefore, exploring factors that shape career expectations of very young students is paramount. To achieve a greater gender balance in STEM occupations, interventions should focus on (early) educational careers and the early divergence of female and male career expectations (Archer et al., 2010, 2013).
While variations in science and mathematics teaching across schools may contribute to within-country variations in STEM aspirations, researchers have started looking into cross-country differences, trying to understand how historical and cultural social differences, in particular in labour markets and education systems, may contribute to the variation in males’ and females’ aspirations to STEM careers. Social norms and values have repeatedly been found to influence students’ career decisions. Research has also explored general characteristics that differentiate entire education systems, and curriculum-specific characteristics concerning the differences in mathematics or science teaching. The attention was focused on the former, exploring the ways students in different types of educational systems develop an interest in STEM careers, and less consideration has been paid to subject-specific policies.
In this research, we are focusing on all three layers of cross-country differences: cultural differences, general characteristics of educational systems and the characteristics specific to school curricula. We explore cultural differences by analysing gender essentialist values, i.e. the widely shared conviction that women are naturally suited to occupations involving inter-human communication and caring activities, while men are naturally suited to occupations involving technology and abstract problem-solving, was argued to be the major factor enhancing gender-typical career choices (Sikora and Pokropek, 2012; Charles, 2017).
General characteristics of educational system are represented by three forms of relevant institutional arrangements: the level of tracking, vocational orientation and standardisation. It is argued and supported by evidence that educational systems that differ with respect to tracking, vocational orientation and degree of standardisation produce different outcomes for students in terms of education achievement, equality of opportunities and labour market placement (Bol and Van de Werfhorst, 2013). A number of studies have demonstrated that these institutional arrangements may affect students’ educational and occupational preferences (Buchmann and Dalton, 2002; Sikora & Pokropek, 2012a).
Curriculum-specific characteristics are addressed by analysing: (1) the existence of a national strategy to evoke interest in these subjects; (2) an explicit attempt to address the gender imbalance in STEM; (3) some elements of the content of science and mathematics curricula; and (4) the existence of ability grouping in the classroom.