Main Content
Session Information
11 SES 08 JS, School Evaluations
Joint Paper Session NW 09 and NW 11
Contribution
Our goal was to describe and interpret, with as much acuity as possible, primary school teachers’ perceptions and expectations regarding inspection. We carried out a descriptive and interpretative case study, using the methodological continuum perspective in the plan of research procedures (Huberman, Miles, 1994).
The study adopted a qualitative methodology. Questionnaires, semi-structured interviews and document analysis were used as data collection techniques. 19 teachers from primary school and four school inspectors participated in the research.
In terms of the methodological design, this empirical research encompasses three distinct stages. In a first stage, and so as to study the representations of the teachers working in the school under analysis during the 2012/2013 academic year, about inspection in the field of the activities developed in the MP, we collected data through a questionnaire.
In a second stage, and with the aim of clarifying and deepening the data obtained in the first stage, we randomly chose three of the teachers, who we interviewed using the semi-structured interview technique, which was also used to collect data from four education inspectors. We analysed the data obtained in each of the moments and carried out, through triangulation, content analysis based on Bogdan and Biklen’s (1999) premise that the interview enables the collection of descriptive data in the language of the subject him/herself, allowing the development of an insight about his/her interpretation of reality. The interview was based on the guiding questions that needed to be deepened, allowing “to analyse the value systems, the normative references, the interpretations of the situations and the readings that the interviewees make of their experiences” (Quivy, Campenhoudt, 1998, p. 90). In this way we assured a space for open answers, the deepening of topics that we consider as key points and the introduction of relevant issues that may arise from the answers.
In a third stage we carried out document analysis using official documents of the participating school, minutes of meetings and reports produced after the inspection, both on the part of the inspecting agents and on the part of the actors subjected to intervention.
The diversification of methods for data collection enabled to grasp several perspectives on the same situation, to obtain information of a different nature and to make comparisons. Through the triangulation of information, we avoided threats to the internal validity inherent in the way data are collected (Calado, Ferreira, 2005).
Method
Our goal was to describe and interpret, with as much acuity as possible, primary school teachers’ perceptions and expectations regarding inspection. We carried out a descriptive and interpretative case study, using the methodological continuum perspective in the plan of research procedures (Huberman, Miles, 1994). The study adopted a qualitative methodology. Questionnaires, semi-structured interviews and document analysis were used as data collection techniques. 19 teachers from primary school and four school inspectors participated in the research. In terms of the methodological design, this empirical research encompasses three distinct stages. In a first stage, and so as to study the representations of the teachers working in the school under analysis during the 2012/2013 academic year, about inspection in the field of the activities developed in the MP, we collected data through a questionnaire. In a second stage, and with the aim of clarifying and deepening the data obtained in the first stage, we randomly chose three of the teachers, who we interviewed using the semi-structured interview technique, which was also used to collect data from four education inspectors. We analysed the data obtained in each of the moments and carried out, through triangulation, content analysis based on Bogdan and Biklen’s (1999) premise that the interview enables the collection of descriptive data in the language of the subject him/herself, allowing the development of an insight about his/her interpretation of reality. The interview was based on the guiding questions that needed to be deepened, allowing “to analyse the value systems, the normative references, the interpretations of the situations and the readings that the interviewees make of their experiences” (Quivy, Campenhoudt, 1998, p. 90). In this way we assured a space for open answers, the deepening of topics that we consider as key points and the introduction of relevant issues that may arise from the answers. In a third stage we carried out document analysis using official documents of the participating school, minutes of meetings and reports produced after the inspection, both on the part of the inspecting agents and on the part of the actors subjected to intervention. The diversification of methods for data collection enabled to grasp several perspectives on the same situation, to obtain information of a different nature and to make comparisons. Through the triangulation of information, we avoided threats to the internal validity inherent in the way data are collected (Calado, Ferreira, 2005).
Expected Outcomes
The results of the research study show the degree of agreement and disagreement regarding the role of GIES, specifically regarding the importance and efficiency of MP, designed with the goal of observing and monitoring educational action. Teachers’ representation regarding the inspection activity is that it focuses mainly on control, in detriment of the monitoring function that is claimed to be carried out. Teachers demand a more intense monitoring action that helps them find solutions to daily problems and improve pedagogical practice. Nonetheless, an objection on the part of these professionals to the entry of the inspecting agents in their classrooms is evident, denying the inspectors’ need to observe the teaching practice in the effective development of MP’s activities. The teachers do not confirm the existence of a cause-and-effect link between inspection and the improvement in the teaching practices, emphasising, instead, the intensification of the bureaucratic burden that seems to bring little or no positive results to students’ academic performance. In this hesitation between the fulfilment of the bureaucratic requirements imposed by the Ministry and the demands inherent to their daily action, these professionals often find themselves in a certain duality. If, on the one hand, they have to fulfil the official role, determined by the functions and attributions of the inspection activity, on the other hand, they have to respond to the demands their daily life fulfilling the real role. This can be understood considering that there is no specialisation in a certain level of education, and that inspection is forced to respond to a large number of requests, hence its activity can become inaccurate.
References
Abreu, H. (2012). Inspeção Escolar: do controle à democratização do ensino. Pós em Revista. Belo Horizonte: Centro Universitário Newton Paiva. Bogdan, R. & Biklen, S. (1999). Investigação qualitativa em educação: uma introdução à teoria e métodos. Porto: Porto Editora. Calado, S. & Ferreira, S. (2005). Análise de documentos: método de recolha e análise de dados. Dissertação de Mestrado, Instituto de Educação, Universidade de Lisboa. Carvalho, M. (2011). As multirracionalidades no contexto da organização escolar. Revista Portuguesa de Educação. Vol. 2, nº 24., pp. 33-56. CNE - Conselho Nacional de Educação. (2015). Avaliação Externa das Escolas. Lisboa, Portugal: INCM. Huberman, M. & Miles, B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Quivy, R. & Campenhoudt, L. (1998). Manual de investigação em Ciências da Educação. Lisboa: Gradiva. Rodrigues, S. (2016). Inspeção-Geral da Educação e Ciência e Avaliação das escolas: o caso da autoavaliação de um agrupamento de escolas. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade de Lisboa: Instituto de Educação.
Programme by Network 2019
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
Network 28. Sociologies of Education
Network 29. Reserach on Arts Education
Network 30. Research on Environmental und Sustainability Education
Network 31. Research on Language and Education (LEd)
Network 32. Organizational Education
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
Marginal Content
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.