01 SES 17 A, Ecosystems of Teacher Develoment Part 3
Symposium continued from 01 SES 16 A
In Lithuania, as in other Eastern European countries, since the Singing Revolution in 1989, educational change was extremely rapid and contradictory. It is meandering down between two different models of educational change – professional and production, as conceptualised by Dean Fink (Fink, 2016:13-21). Professional model is based on trust in people aiming to enhance professional capital (Fullan & Hargreaves, 2012). Professional capital of each country is its educational community – teachers, leaders, teacher trainers, researchers working collaboratively for the main mission - deep and meaningful learning of all students. Professional capital is the fundament of enhanced educational performance and sustained educational improvement as it unites individual professional dignity and responsibility, as well as collective responsibility at the system level for the enhancement of teaching profession. Production model is based on trust in forms, functions and procedures rather than people. In this model teachers considered to be a human resource rather than professionals, principals are just managers of production rather than leaders of learning and the results of production are easily counted students’ test scores (Fink, 2016:18). Narratives of 9 experienced teachers were studied using a life history approach (Goodson&Gill, 2011) which is blending personal subjective experience of research participants, researcher’s world view and experience with a wider social, political, historical context. The findings of this study reflect the tensions between educational policy and practice related to changing orientation of educational reforms: from humanistic goals towards instrumental and economic measures, from professional freedom towards meaningless regulations. Contradictive trajectories of educational change are represented not only in political decisions but in professional biographies of educators. Practitioners are becoming “objects” of policy requirements which affect their authentic professional lifes (Silova & Brehm, 2013). This paper reveals how constant and consistent professional learning, as well as trusting and supportive school culture is helping agentic teachers (Day, 2012, Priestley et al., 2015) to overcome external pressures and maintain their authentic professional life despite the predominance of production model in educational context of Lithuania. The tensions and contradictions between policy and practice make this ecosystem extremely fragile and vulnerable, limited and fragmented.
Fink, D. (Ed.) (2016). Trust and Verify. The Real Keys to School Improvement. London: UCL Institute of Education Press, University College; Goodson, I.F (2005). The Selected Work of Ivor F. Goodson. World Library of Educationalists. London: Routledge. Goodson, I.F.& Gill, S.R (2011). Narrative Pedagogy. Life History and Learning. New York : Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. Hargreaves, A., and Fullan, M. (2012) Professional Capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York: Teachers College Press. Pranckūnienė, E., Ruškus, J. (2016). The Lithuania Case: Faster than history but slower than a lifetime. In Fink, D. (Ed.) (2016). Trust and Verify. The Real Keys to School Improvement. UCL Institute of Education Press, University College, London. Priestly, M., Biesta, G., Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher Agency. An Ecological Approach. London:Bloomsbury. Silova,I.& Brehm,W.C. (2013). The Shifting Boundaries of Teacher Professionalism: Education Privatization(s) in the Post-Socialist Education Space In T. Seddon, J. Ozga, & J. Levin (Eds.). Educators, professionalism and politics: Global transitions, national spaces, and professional projects. New York: Routledge, p. 55-74. Timperley , H.S. (2011). Realizing the Power of Professional Learning. McGraw Hill: Open University Press.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.