Session Information
28 SES 13 B, Towards an Envisioned Research Association: Future scenarios and their possible realisation
Research Workshop
Contribution
Invited Speakers: Kari Facer, Terry Sheddon
Network 28 was established in 2010 and had three main objectives (Europeanization, standardization and epistemic governance) which has now been successfully attracting papers for nine years. In the proposed workshop the intention is to look to the network’ future and to try and agree a collective vision for what it will be and what it will have achieved by 2040.
In order to do this the workshop will be organised around the concept of backcasting. Being a part of a larger category of normative scenarios-building (Borjeson, L.,Hojer, M.,Dreborg, K.-H.,Ekvall, T.2006), the approach of backcasting enables participant to put aside existing vocabularies and train of thoughts in order to generate suitable transititon paths to alternative institutional structures (Király, G. at al. 2013 ). Instead of attempting to forecast on the existing spatial, temporal, relational context this line of futurology links acceptable or desirable conditions of future back to the present (Wangel, J 2011; Quist, J., Vergragt, P 2006; Kiraly, G. at. al. 2013). Hence, it enables the different values and value-laden assumptions to be overcome and to explore what the desired framework of future enables participants to achieve and construct. Two speakers will be asked to present their ideas about the future in terms of three key areas of activities (community, reflexivity, environment), which will be circulated beforehand. At the workshop these ideas will be explored through group work.
Speaking and contemplating about future necessarily entails thoughts on how different ideas on society are at work. In recent years, there has been a growing concern on ‘sociology of expectation’. Research is persued in response to how future expectations are foreclosed, colonized or managed (Facer, K 2013; Adam, B. 2011, 2018; Beckert, J. 2016; Mische, A.2014; Brown-Michael 2003). At times when education is being re-narrated from different national–transnational discursive positionings and locations it is insightful to look again at the interpretation and problematization of future (Sheddon,T 1993,2014; Facer 2013).
Method
In this context, the workshop offers to reconsider challenges and opportunities of transnational spaces within the field of sociologies of education through envisioning a desired future scenario and from that perspective backward elaborating possible spots of action. In accordance with the call, visions will be provoked and discussed in the following areas: • Community: Who is the sociology of education for? How is it possible to engage multiple publics in multiple ways, connecting professional, critical, policy, and public/lay knowledge in the field of education? • Reflexivity: What are the aims of sociology of education in the current scenario? How can we deal with the ‘traditional’ tension between instrumental and reflexive knowledge (Burawoy, 2005)? • Environment: What are the epistemological, theoretical, methodological and thematic challenges that the sociology of education is called to address? What are the different traditions of the sociology of education across Europe? To encapsulate the philosophical and political potential of NW28 the reflection of invited speakers leads us to question, reflect upon and finally leave the current understanding of EERA in a view to collectively create a vision. Participants, thus, can ladder up and down the field of future expectations and define steps on the route backwards illuminating original lines of discovery, practice and reflection.
Expected Outcomes
The workshop will most probably produce: • arhivable documents, photos of story-cubes, charts and audiotapes transcribed and sent to participants for further remark and approval • four key aspects and four actions fundamental in a short, middle or long run realization of institutional change concerning community, reflexivity and environment • situational analysis of the discourse The innovative character of the proposal corresponds to EERA mission since it acknowledges transnational context with social, cultural, and political applicability.
References
Adam, B. (2018). Four meditations on time and future relations. TIME & SOCIETY, 27(3), 384–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X18789222 Adam, B. (2011). Wendell Bell and the sociology of the future: Challenges past, present and future. Futures, 43, 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.04.007 Adele Clarke (2017). Situational Analysis After the Interpretative turn. Sage Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined Futures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Borjeson, L.,Hojer, M.,Dreborg, K.-H.,Ekvall, T. (2006). Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user’s guide. Futures, 38(7), 723–739. Brown, N., & Michael, M. (2003). A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,uid&db=edsair&AN=edsair.od.......758..98c0387fc4a19283a8bc7715a8d7a044&site=eds-live Grimaldi, E. (2015). What future for educational research in Europe ? Political , epistemological and ethical challenges. http://doi.org/10.1177/1474904114565156 Facer, K. (2013). The problem of the future and the possibilities of the present in education research. International Journal of Educational Research, 61(Achievement Goals and Achievement Goal Orientations in Education), 135–143. Retrieved from http://10.0.3.248/j.ijer.2013.03.001 Kiraly, G., Pataki, Gy., Koves, A., Balazs, B. (2013). Models of (future) society: Bringing social theories back in backcasting. Futures, 51, July, 19–30. Lane, D. C. (2007). The power of the bond between cause and effect: Jay Wright Forrester and the field of system dynamics. System Dynamics Review, 23(2–3), 95–118. DOI:10.1002/sdr.370. Mische, A. (2014). Measuring futures in action: projective grammars in the Rio+20 debates. THEORY AND SOCIETY, 43(3–4), 437–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9226-3 Quist, J., Vergragt, P. (2006). Past and future of backcasting: The shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures, 38(9), 1027–1045. Seddon, T. (1993) Context and Beyond: Reframing the Theory and Practice of Education. London, UK: Falmer Press. Seddon, T. (2014) Renewing sociology of education? Knowledge spaces, situated enactments, and sociological practice in a world on the move. European Educational Research Journal 13(1): 9–25. Wangel, J. (2011). Exploring social structures and agency in backcasting studies for sustainable development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(5),872–882.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.