The doctoral study aims find out how women teachers describe their experiences of being mothers and practitioners and ultimately, what teacher mother’s stories tell us about influencing factors in their lives. Currently, 25% of female teachers in the UK leave the profession during their 30s, which has been linked to caring responsibilities including maternity leave and childcare (Simons, 2016, Morgan, 2015). Research from around the world suggests that this issue is not limited to the UK (Abele & Spurk, 2011; Berggren & Lauster, 2014; Gannerud, 2001; Gash, 2009; Hauver-James, 2010; Knowles, Nieuwenhuis & Smit, 2009).
The unfair distribution of unpaid work in families is well documented (Fatherhood Institute, 2016; Park, Bryson, Clery, Curtice & Phillips, 2013) and it is suggested that on average, women complete 49 hours of childcare and housework per week in the family home, compared to 24 hours for men (Park et al, 2013). Quantitative research is showing a trend for teachers to work very long hours (Richardson, 2016, Sellen, 2016, Hardy, 2016) and that teachers are risking ‘burn out’ (Sellen, 2016)
Research Question:
- What do the life history stories of teacher mothers suggest about this special circumstance?
The theoretical framework for the study, is based on the work of Foucault and Bronfenbrenner. Foucault is relevant because of his work on institutions and discipline. Foucault began with an analysis of the power structures in a closed institutional system – a prison, but went on to generalise these constructs to other, open institutions. In my study, these institutions are the place of work (school), family and community. The institutions span the systems described using Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems model (1979). Discipline within these institutions is a type of power, linking institutions and making them function in specific ways (Deleuze, 1986; Foucault, 1977).
Although Bronfenbrenner’s theory has been criticised for being oversimplified; he criticised it himself, in later years (Kell, 2016) it gives a framework for thinking about different influences on teacher parents. It is included in my theoretical framework to support a Foucauldian analysis of power within the systems, rather than assuming that subjects of domination are indeed dominated from one place, or by one person or group (Davis, 2009). This also sits with intersectionality and a perspective of power as a dynamic process (Bilge, 2010). Bilge discusses how intersectionality works at a microsocial and macrosocial level (2010 p.58), reminiscent of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems.