10 SES 01 C, Special Call: Mapping Teacher Education across Europe and Beyond
This paper responds to a recent discussion on research-engaged teacher education (e.g. Afdal 2017) as well as a call to cultivate and examine student teachers’ agency (e.g. Edwards 2017). The aim of the study presented here is to explore what kind of standards the student teachers set for the teacher profession in research-engaged teacher education, and, thereby, how they position themselves. The research questions are as follows: 1. What kind of teacher profession do the student teachers describe? 2. What is the role of research skills in these descriptions? 3. What kind of agency do these descriptions imply?
Today, in the leading systems in the field of education, teaching is seen as a research-engaged profession, requiring high-level skills and knowledge (Darling-Hammond et al., 2017). Teacher education in these societies is typically based on research about student and teacher learning (Darling-Hammond et al., 2017; Korthagen, 2017). By research skills we mean skills needed in understanding, transforming and producing information, leading to critical and creative thinking (Murtonen, Rautopuro, & Väisänen, 2007). In policy level, an urgent European-wide challenge is set for the teacher education to develop professionals who base their educational decisions in teacher’s work on rational arguments in addition to experiential ones (European Commission, 2014).
In line with the endeavors to enhance the quality of teaching worldwide, the teachers need to have a sense of being empowered (Darling-Hammond et al., 2017). Thus, fostering and examining student teachers’ agency is vital in teacher education. By agency, we mean ownership and authority over one’s action that is needed in teacher’s work since teachers must influence their work instead of experiencing things as just happening (e.g. Juutilainen, Metsäpelto, & Poikkeus, 2018).
Focusing on narrative practices, this study reveals how the students in the flow of discourse are imposing order of their experiences and are making sense of events and actions in teacher education (cf. Riessman, 2001). Narrative aspects of professional agency in teacher education have been scarce (cf. Hilppö, Lipponen, Kumpulainen, & Virlander, 2016). However, their benefit is crucial since they help notice features that otherwise remain hidden. Concentrating on narrative practice exposes ways in which the students understand and create the teacher profession as well as construct and negotiate their agency.
In Finland, which is the context of this study, research skills play a strong role, as the primary school teachers study a Master’s degree. By the degree, the students will have a qualification to work as a teacher in grades 1.–6. in primary school (age group 7–13 years). The students start their first teaching practice in the first term and it takes place in a university training school. In their teaching practice, the students are assumed to show emerging agency and rehearse research skills in action. Nevertheless, the research skills studies and the teaching practice and have claimed to be separate from each other. Thus, it is important to understand what kind of narrative practice of teacher profession a research-engaged program design produces, and what kind of agency is thereby manifested.
Methods The context of this paper is primary school teacher education in one Finnish university. Written texts (N=74) were retrieved from the first-year students’ reflexive teaching practice reports in autumn 2018. The texts dealt with the significance of the research skills for the students as well as insights they had made on teacher’s work in the teaching practice. In order to understand how the student teachers construct the teacher profession and their agency, the approach of narrative practice was used both in the overall theoretical background as well as an analytic tool. The view of narrative practice emphasizes the role of language as multiple and fragmented, and texts are seen revealing narrative as practice within social interaction in teacher education (cf. de Fina & Georgakopoulou, 2008). Narratives deploy arguments that sustain practices. Attention to narratives addresses questions of how professionals, in this case, student teachers, conduct themselves to establish the legitimacy of their activities, and, thereby, the narratives shape the individual’s sense of self (Ackroyd, 2016). Therefore, student teachers can position themselves as agentic beings that assume control over events and actions or as victims of circumstances. In addition, they can shift among positions, giving themselves agentic roles in certain scenes, and passive roles in others (Riessman, 2001). Firstly, the content of the texts was analyzed by concentrating on how the teacher profession was described in the data. Secondly, a closer look at the student teachers’ narration was taken to explore how the students constructed their agency in relation to these descriptions. Especially, the focus was on evaluative verbs and evaluative language in general, negatives as well as contrastives (Tannen, 1993). Emphasis was not put on traditional storylines but rather on atypical, small stories with a functional perspective on narrative and language use in general, in line with the theoretical body of narrative practice (de Fina & Georgakopoulou, 2008; Riessman, 2001).
Expected outcomes Teaching was described as a demanding profession, including a variety of responsibilities and requiring high-standard skills and knowledge. Many expressions were written in a binding way, as a must, implying restricted agency (cf. also Hilppö et al. 2016). However, opportunities and possibilities to act and influence were also described, implying enacted agency. The research skills’ role in the teacher profession was depicted as essential. Research skills were seen important in perceiving, decision-making and interpreting (cf. the model by Blömeke, Gustafsson, & Shavelson, 2015), in evaluation, in co-operating consistently with parents, and developing the teaching and the school as well as in teacher learning (cf. Korthagen, 2017). Research skills were described as useful but, however, not inevitable. On the other hand, also problems in integrating research skills into the teacher profession were presented. In many expressions the teacher profession was depicted as separate, as a stable object having no link to the self. On the other hand, there were expressions implying collective professional agency, when the students described duties that concerned them as a collective. However, the texts were polyphonic. One student used different kinds of expressions, some of the expressions being separate from the self, some including. To conclude, cultivating student teachers’ agency requires more attention. This paper contributes to program design and development in European teacher education by underlining how the standards for the teacher profession and, respectively, agency, are shaped not only by teachers at work but also by student teachers in teacher education.
References Ackroyd, S. (2016). Sociological and organisational theories of professions and professionalism. In M. Dent, I. L. Bourgeault, J-L Denis, & E. Kuhlmann (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to the Professions and Professionalism Routledge. Retrieved on from https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315779447.ch1 16 January 2019 Afdal, H. (2017). “Research-based” and “profession-oriented” as prominent knowledge discourses in curriculum restructuring of professional programs. Higher Education 74(3), 401–418. Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J-E., & Shavelson, R. (2015). Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223, 3–13. Darling-Hammond, L., Burns, D., Campbell, C., Goodwin, A. L., Hammerness, K., Low, E., … Zeichner, K. (2017). Empowered educators: how high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass. Edwards, A. (2017). The dialectic of person and practice: How cultural-historical accounts of agency can inform teacher education. In J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 269–285). Los Angeles: SAGE. European Commission (2014). Initial teacher education in Europe: an overview of policy issues. Background note for the ET2020 Working Group on Schools Policy, Author: F. Caena. Retrieved on from: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/ policy/strategic-framework/expert-groups/documents/initial-teacher-education_en.pdf 16 May 2018 de Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Introduction. Narrative analysis in the shift from texts to practices. Text & Talk, 28(3), 275–281. Hilppö, J., Lipponen, L., Kumpulainen, K., & Virlander, M. (2016). Sense of agency and everyday life: Children's perspective. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 10, 50–59. Juutilainen, M., Metsäpelto, R-L., & Poikkeus, A.-M. (2018). Becoming agentic teachers: Experiences of the home group approach as a resource for supporting teacher students' agency. Teaching and Teacher Education 76, 116–125. Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0., Teachers and Teaching, 23(4), 387–405. Murtonen, M., Rautopuro, J., & Väisänen, P. (2007). Introduction. In M. Murtonen, J. Rautopuro, & P. Väisänen (Eds.), Learning and teaching of research methods at university. (pp. 7–14). Research in Educational Sciences: 30. Turku: Finnish Educational Research Association. Riessman, C. K. (2011). Analysis of personal narratives. In J. F. Gubrium, & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of Interview Research, Thousand Oaks: SAGE, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412973588.n40. Tannen, D. (1993). What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 14–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Some networks have already started to plan their chairperson(s).
But at the moment chairpersons are only pencilled in, as we will still need to check for time conflicts between presentation and chairing duties. EERA office will work on this in due course and then officially let chairpersons know about their chairing duties.
Meanwhile, thank you for your patience.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.