ERG SES C 13, Research in Higher Education
Since joining Bologna Process in 2010, Kazakhstan has had an opportunity to integrate into the international education and research arena. This integration implies a compliance of local standards of higher education with the international standards, among which is the establishment of lifelong learning strategy in higher education institutions.
The given research will focus on developing abilities and skills incorporated in a global competency, which are collectively known and referred as “lifelong learning skills” (LLL skills) within the teacher training institutions in Kazakhstan.
The purpose of the study is to examine how the teacher training programs promote future teachers’ development as lifelong learners, to reveal the teacher educators’ perception of lifelong learning skills and how the lifelong learning skills are inco
As a theoretical framework, Hay McBer Model of Teacher Effectiveness (McBer (2000) Research into Teacher Effectiveness) will be used. Among a great variety of models, that attempt to describe effective teaching, this model is considered to be one of the most useful as it gives an in-depth and detailed description of the teacher effectiveness model, that might be used as a measure to assess the teachers’ work from professional and personal perspectives. Initially, the model was oriented to provide a framework to assess effective teaching in secondary schools, however, with a few adjustments and it can be is equally applied for teachers in the lifelong learning sector (Scales, 2013). It consists of the three main interrelated aspects of the model: teaching skills, professional characteristics and classroom climate that lead to learners’ progress. Each element falls into categories and subcategories which provides a valuable tool for teachers to assess their effectiveness.
Methodological framework chosen to guide the research design: “Theories of Action” by Argyris and Schőn (1974). In conducting the proposed research study, the data will be collected over four phases which enables access to both academics’ espoused theories of action (what they understand and aspire to do in their practice) and theories in use (what they actually teach and assess in practice) (Argyris & Schőn, 1974). The overall research design for the proposed research includes the methods of data collection for each of the four phases. So, within the first phase semi-structured interviews will be conducted to examine teacher educators to get their perception about LLL skills implementation and practice, that will follow by the second phase, where a content analysis of curriculum documents will be done. Within the third phase, direct observation of teaching for assessing the practice of LLL skills will be accomplished. The final phase will be devoted to the analysis of the expected and unexpected results and consequences of the class observation.
This thesis adopts a qualitative case study research. Purposeful sampling strategies will be chosen for defining research participants. The sample of participants will be drawn from eight teacher educators representing four different departments of one National University in Astana city. A series of interviews will be conducted with the teaching staff to get their perception about LLL skills. Aside from interviews, a content analysis of the curriculum documents as well as a direct observation of teaching and assessment practice are planned to be conducted within a given research. Qualitative approach has been chosen as it is applied in processes that cannot be rigorously examined or measured in terms of quantity or of the amount. (Denzin & Lincoln, 2005). As Yilmaz (2013) states, qualitative approach is grounded on a constructivist epistemology and considers socially constructed dynamic reality through an in-depth description of the phenomenon from the perspectives of the research participants. It tries to recognize how social experience originates and gains meaning. Within a qualitative dimension, reality or knowledge are constructed from social and psychological perspectives. The qualitative paradigm considers the association between the knower and the known as tightly connected. Therefore, the researcher would benefit from developing a close, empathic relationship with the participants and subjects being studied. The case study strategy seemed to be relevant within the given research as it is intended to examine the higher educational institution division and its constituent units as a separate case. “Case study is a methodology used to explore a particular instance in detail …The instance has to be identifiable as having clear boundaries and could be a lesson, the teaching of a scheme of work in a school department, a university teaching department…” (Taber, 2014, p. 1875). For the emerging researcher a case study provides an excellent opportunity to gain in- depth insight into a case. It enables the researcher to collect data from a variety of sources: interview, lesson observation and document analysis and to converge the data to reveal the case (Baxter & Jack, 2008).
The deep analysis of the relevant literature on the topic demonstrates that there seems to be a shortage of empirical studies conducted to examine the students’ acquiring lifelong learning skills in the Kazakhstani context. Consequently, several issues regarding students’ development of lifelong learning skills, particularly, representing teacher training institutions and universities, remain unknown. Hence, the present study is designed to contribute to the field by examining the development of lifelong learning skills in the context of Kazakhstani higher education institutions. The results of the study will reveal to whether the future teachers representing different departments are prepared to become lifelong learners and how teacher educators’ perceptions of LLL skills differ. Altogether, the findings are expected to demonstrate the current stage of implementation of lifelong learning as a part of education policy in Kazakhstan. In the light of the findings gained within the present study, a number of recommendations will be given both for future studies in the area and for education policy.
Reference Reference 1.Taber, K. S. (2014). Methodological issues in science education research: a perspective from the philosophy of science. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 1839-1893). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. 2.Knapper, C., & Cropley, A., 2000, Lifelong learning in Higher Education., London: Kogan Page, 2000. 3.Anne Virtanen & Päivi Tynjälä (2018): Factors explaining the learning of generic skills: a study of university students’ experiences, Teaching in Higher Education, DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2018.1515195 4.Yilmaz, K., European Journal of Education,Vol. 48, No. 2, 2013 5.Barros, R., 2012, European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults 3 (2012)2, S. 119-134. 6.Scales, P., 2013., Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector., Open University Press 7.Baxter, P., & Jack, S., 2008, Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers., The Qualitative Report Volume 13 Number 4 December 2008 544-559 http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf. 8.State Program of Education Development (SPED) 2011-2020: Retrieved from: https://www.google.kz/search?ei=mnY7XOegMcaWsAGvnamIDQ&q=State+Program+of+Education+Development+%28SPED%29 9.Knapper, C., & Cropley, A., 1985, Lifelong learning in Higher Education., Croom Helm. 10.Tamez, C., Lifelong Learning principles and higher education policies. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295248291_Lifelong_Learning_principles_and_higher_education_policies 11.Billett, S., 2018., Distinguishing lifelong learning from lifelong education, Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation 2(1), pp. 1–7 ,DOI:10.1556/2059.01.2017.3 12.Chen,Z., 2014 The New Analysis f Differences Among Lifelong Learning, Lifelong Education and Learning Society, Scholarly Research Journal for Humanity Science and English Language. 13.Cotronei-Baird, V., Integrating employability skills in the university curriculum: Setting a research agenda that responds to stakeholders’ expectation. Retrieved from: https://www.google.kz/search?source=hp&ei=MYI7XMDbO8eOsgHaob7QBw&q=It+is+an+applicable+theoretical+framework+for+examining+academics%E2%8 14.Scales, P., (2013), Teaching in the lifelong Sector, Open University Press 15.Denzin, N. & Lincoln, S., (2005) Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd edition) (Thousand Oaks, Sage) 16.Coolahan, J. (2002), "Teacher Education and the Teaching Career in an Era of Lifelong Learning", OECD Education Working Papers, No. 2, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/226408628504 17.Baxter, P., & Jack, S., (2008)Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers, The Qualitative Report Volume 13 Number 4 December 2008 544-559 http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf 18.Barros, R., (2012) From lifelong education to lifelong learning. Discussion of some effects of today's neoliberal policies, European journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults 3 (2012) 2, S. 119-134 urn:nbn:de:0111-opus-67417
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.