04 SES 05.5 PS, General Poster Session
General Poster Session
Inclusive education is an international trend, which gradually becomes the new norm for education policies in many countries. This is in line with the Salamanca Statement ((United Nations, 1994) and the United Nations Convention of the Rights for People with Disabilities (UNCRPD, 2006). Both emphasize the importance of educational environments that maximize the academic and social development of all students, with or without special educational needs (SEN).
Active social participation by the students in the school and recognition that students are valued members of the school community, are prerequisites for the realization of successful inclusive education (Bottrell & Goodwin, 2011). Students’ social participation is thus seen as an important outcome measure (Koster, Nakken, Pijl & Van Houten, 2009). Koster et.al. (2009) have defined four key themes of social participation, namely (1) friendships with peers, (2) positive interactions with peers, (3) a positive social self-perception and (4) acceptance by peers.
Although the ideology behind inclusive education is something to strive for, studies have shown ambiguous results whether or not students with SEN achieve social participation in inclusive classrooms. Compared to typically developing peers, students with SEN in inclusive settings are less accepted, have fewer friendships, have less interaction (Petry, 2018) and a lower social self-perception (Bossaert, Colpin, Pijl & Petry, 2012). It is widely recognized that these problems may have negative consequences for students in both short and long term (Kenneth, Bukowski & Laursen, 2011), like adjusting problems, poor social skills and depression.
An alternative to inclusive education is an education setting in which students from special education and students from regular schools go to the same school, so-called integrated education. To optimally stimulate students in their development, students from special education in integrated schools can follow so-called symbiosis trajectories. Such a trajectory means that students from special education follow courses in the regular school. By doing so, contact amongst students with and without SEN might increase, leading to more opportunities for social participation. Not much is known about the social participation of students with (different types of) SEN in an integrated secondary school setting. This study will try to fill this gap and will study three components of social participation (friendships, acceptance and social self-perception) of students with SEN in an integrated school setting in The Netherlands. Related factors of social participation will also be investigated.
Different factors may play a role in realizing a positive social participation, both peer- related and personal related factors. With regards to peer-related factors, De Boer and Pijl (2016) have stated that negative attitudes of peers is an important barrier in achieving social participation. Attitudes can be seen as an individual’s viewpoint or disposition towards a particular ‘object’ (a person, a thing, etc.) (Gall, Borg & Gall, 1996). Attitudes of students are most negative towards peers with social- emotional and behavior problems.
Secondly, attitudes are influence by peer norms, particularly in adolescence (Nesdale & Lawson, 2011). Peer norms in this context reflect the expected and accepted behavior of a social group (Shaw, 1981).
With regards to personal related factors, students’ own behavior and cognitive capabilities have been demonstrated to influence friendships and peer acceptance. Students with behavior problems are more often excluded, are less accepted and have fewer friends compared to typically developing students and students with a cognitive impairment (Newcombe, Bukowski & Pattee, 1993).
Lastly, a lack of social skills is frequently claimed to be an important factor hindering in realizing a positive social participation. However, little research has focused on the social skills of students with SEN and studies who did include this factor, did not support this assumption (e.g., Garrotte, 2017).
The cross-sectional study will be conducted at an integrated educational setting within The Netherlands. This secondary education setting combines four different types of schools; two regular secondary schools (vocational education), a secondary special education school for students with cognitive disabilities (CI) and a secondary special education school for students with behavioral disorders (BD). Approximately 940 students are attending this school setting, including app. 150 students with SEN. Three of the four key themes of social participation will be studied, namely friendships, acceptance and social self-perception. In addition, peer norms, attitude, social skills and behavioral problems are included to examine the influence of peer-related and personal related factors on the social participation of students with SEN. Sociometric data will be collected to assess friendships and acceptance of all students in the integrated educational setting, both of students with and without SEN. Students will be asked to nominated friends within their own classroom, but also friends outside of the classroom. To assess the third key component of social participation, students’ social self-perception, the Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents (SPPA; Harter, 1988) will be administered. This questionnaire is a self-report questionnaire for adolescents aged 12-18 years. It was designed to assess the global self-worth of a child and five different domains of self-perception: scholastic competence, social acceptance, athletic competence, physical appearance and behavioral conduct. Peer norms and attitudes will be measured using developed questionnaires. The attitude questionnaire will focus on personal attitudes towards other students within the school, specifically regarding behavioral intent. The questionnaire on peer norms will inquire after peer norms held by friends and classmates. Teachers will be asked to rate the social skills and behavior of their students. Behavior will be measured using the Teacher’s Report Form (TRF) (Achenbach, 2001). For the social skills of students, a standardized questionnaire, called the Social Competence Observation List (SCOL), on social-emotional development of the students will be used (Joosten, 2006). After receiving informed consent from parent and/or students, all questionnaires will be digitally administered during school hours.
This cross-sectional study will provide insight into the social participation of students with and without SEN in an integrated school setting. Differences between types of schools will become apparent. Moreover, this study will look into peer-related and personal related factors that might influence social participation, such as attitude, peer norms, behavior and social skills. Based on the literature, it is hypnotized that the results of this study will show that students with CI in an integrated school setting will hold more positive self-perceptions, have more friends and feel less rejected and more accepted in comparison to students within BD. Furthermore it is expected students following the so-called symbiosis trajectories will form more extended networks in comparison to students with SEN without symbiosis trajectories. These trajectories provide the opportunity for increased contact with other peers, therefore making the formation of more friendships more likely. Attitudes and peer norms towards students with CI are expected to be more positive than towards students with BD. Previous research has shown this tendency (Laws & Kelly, 2005). Internalizing and externalizing behavior is expected to have a negative effect on all key components of social participation. Social skills are expected to differ between students with CI and BD, with better social skills predicting more friendships and more acceptance. Understanding the relations between the key components of social participation (friendships, acceptance, social self-perception) is critical to the development of students with SEN within our educational systems. The results of this study might offer new insights into the social participation of students with SEN in an integrated school setting and factors fostering or hindering this.
Bossaert, G., de Boer, A., Frostad, P., Pijl, S.J., & Petry, K. (2015). Social participation of students with special educational needs in different educational systems. Irish Educational Studies, 34(1), 43-54. DOI: 10.108 0/03323315.2015.1010703 Bottrell, D., & Goodwin, S. (2011). Schools, Communities and Social Inclusion. Australia: MS&E publisher Australia. De Boer, A.A., & Pijl, S.J. (2016). The acceptance and rejection of peers with ADHD and ASD in general secondary education, The Journal of Educational Research, 109(3), 325-332, DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2014.958812. Frostad & Pijl (2007). Does being friendly help in making friends? The relation between the social position and social skills of pupils with special needs in mainstream education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 22(1), 15-30, DOI: 10.1080/08856250601082224. Gall, M.D., W.R. Borg, and J.P. Gall. (1996). Research methods. In Educational research: An introduction, 6th ed., ed. M.D. Gall, W.R. Borg, and J.P. Gall, 165–370. New York: Longman. Garrote, A. (2017). Relationship between the social participation and social skills of pupils with an intellectual disability: A study in inclusive classrooms. Frontline Learning Research, 5(1), 1-15. Harter, S. (1988). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver Press. Kenneth, H.R., Bukowski, W.M., & Laursen, B. (2011). Handbook of peer interactions, relationships and groups. New York: Guilford Press. Koster, M., Nakken, H., Pijl, S. J., & van Houten, E. J. (2009). Being part of the peer group: A literature study focussing on the social dimension of inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13, 117-140. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. & Cook, J. M. (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. Nesdale, D., & Lawson, M. (2011). Social groups and children’s intergroup attitudes: Can school norms moderate the effects of social group norms? Child Development, 82(5), 1594-1606. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01637.x Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M. & Pattee, L. (1993). Children's peer relations: A meta- analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128 Petry, K. (2018). The relationship between class attitudes towards peers with a disability and peer acceptance, friendships and peer interactions of students with a disability in regular secondary schools, European Journal of Special Needs Education, 33(2), 254-268, DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2018.1424782. Shaw, M. (1981). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.