10 SES 05.5 PS, General Poster Session
General Poster Session
Inquiry based learning (IBL) is an approach to teaching and learning that aims to involve students in the research process steps as analysing a problem, formulating questions and hypotheses, developing a plan to obtain supporting evidence to answer the question(s), interpret and discuss the results. BL is linked to constructivist and experiential learning theories, as well as a range of pedagogical methods. In the scope of the general steps that characterize IBL, there are however different levels of inquiry that were identified. Since Schwab four levels of inquiry, different categories were considered, eg. Banchi and Bell (2008) proposed levels as: Confirmation Inquiry, Structured Inquiry, Guided Inquiry and Open Inquiry.
Although there is some controversial about the impact of IBL in students learning (Hodson, 2014), there is also evidence of the positive impact of this approach on this process, at least to develop competences as deep comprehension and conceptual understanding (Schmid & Bogner, 2015). However, there is also evidence that teachers still need training about the topic and this should be a priority to ensure the maximal amount of resources are used and that the teachers implement IBL scenarios (Twigg, 2010).
This poster aims to describe student teachers knowledge and conceptions about IBL and how they evolve in the scope of a teacher-education workshop on IBL. The workshop was implemented as an activity of the project Next Lab http://nextlab.golabz.eu/. The conceptual model about IBL developed by Next Lab project pointed out to an Inquiry Learning Cycle to specify the consecutive steps of an inquiry learning process, which includes five main phases: Orientation, Conceptualization, Investigation, Conclusion and Discussion (Pedaste et al, 2015).
The IBL teacher education workshop presented in this work was carried out in the scope of a curricular unit of a Teacher Education Master Course of a Portuguese University. It was based in the conceptual framework and resources developed by the Project NEXT LAB. The participants were 103 student teachers, from different subject areas, as Humanities, Science and Sports. The workshop lasted five sessions. The workshop was implement in five presencial sessions. In the first session, inquiry-based approach was presented; during the second, students registered in the Graasp platform and start to create their Inquiry Learning Space. Meanwhile, students had to develop an IBL plan. During this phase, students communicated with the trainers by email or skype. There was a session dedicated to the analysis and reflection about the work in progress. Finally, each group presented their IBL plan and activity to the colleagues, during two sessions. Online questionnaires were answered by the participants, which focused on conceptual and didactic-pedagogical knowledge about IBL and ICT, as well as previous experiences, self-efficacy and teaching conceptions. Participants answered the questionnaires at the beginning of the first session and when all the sessions and tasks involved in the workshop ended. Post questionnaire included questions about platform evaluation. IBL class plans developed in the platform were also analysed.
Results evidenced lower levels of student teachers pre-knowledge about IBL but an increase in content and pedagogical knowledge in the post questionnaire, after the workshop took place. Content analysis of lesson plans confirmed these results.
Banchi, H. & Bell, R (2008) The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46,2, 26-29 Hodson, D. (2014). Learning Science, Learning about Science, Doing Science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36, 15, 2534-2553. Pedaste, M. et al. (2015) Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle- Educational Research Review, 14, p. 47–61. Schmid. S. & Bogner, F. (2015) Does Inquiry-Learning Support Long-Term Retention of Knowledge? International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 10, 4, 51-70 Twigg, V. V. (2010). "Teachers' practices, values and beliefs for successful inquiry-based teaching in the International Baccalaureate Primary years Programme". Journal of Research in International Education. 9 (1): 40–65.
Some networks have already started to plan their chairperson(s).
But at the moment chairpersons are only pencilled in, as we will still need to check for time conflicts between presentation and chairing duties. EERA office will work on this in due course and then officially let chairpersons know about their chairing duties.
Meanwhile, thank you for your patience.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.