Session Information
16 SES 03 A, Does Teacher Education Matter? The Relevance of Pre-Service Teacher Education in the Digital Age
Symposium
Contribution
Teacher Education Institutes face an enormous challenge to prepare their students for teaching in the digital age. Despite the fact that the new generation of teachers is familiar with using technology for private purposes, many of them do not have the basic technology skills needed for becoming competent in using technology for educational purposes (Kumar & Vigil, 2011; Tondeur et al., 2017). In this contribution we present findings from our research in a large teacher education institute in the Netherlands, preparing teachers for primary and lower secondary education. Our research consists of a survey study to provide baseline information about the skills and attitudes of pre-service students towards technology. In addition we conducted focused design studies, small intervention studies, through which we aim to contribute to pre-service teachers professional reasoning about the use of technology for teaching and learning. Theoretical underpinnings underlying these studies can be found in the work of Knezek and Christensen (2016) on factors contributing to technology integration, Tondeur et al. (2012) about effective teaching strategies to prepare pre-service teachers for technology use in their teaching, Hunter (2015) on technological affordances, the TPACK framework (Koehler & Mishra, 2008) and Shulman’s concept of pedagogical reasoning (Shulman, 1987). The findings of the survey study in combination with the design studies show that quite a number of the pre-service teachers tend to overestimate their technology integration skills. In addition a fair number of students shows anxiety towards using technology. As a result the findings of the design studies are mixed. Some students develop their pedagogical reasoning during the intervention, and make explicit use of the affordances of specific technology for their (and their pupils’) learning but other students struggle with the technology itself, which hinders their learning. At ECER we like to discuss these findings as well as possibilities for fine-tuning the interventions.
References
Hunter, J. (2015). Technology integration and high possibility classrooms. Building from TPACK. New York: Routledge. Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3-29). Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2016). Extending the will, skill, tool model of technology integration: Adding pedagogy as a new model construct. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(3), 307-325. Kumar, S., & Vigil, K. (2011). The net generation as preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 144–153. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers and Education, 59(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009 Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., van Braak, J., Voogt, J., & Prestridge, S. (2017). Preparing beginning teachers for technology integration in education: Ready for take-off? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 157-177.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.