Session Information
13 SES 16 B JS, Public Pedagogy and Sustainability Challenges Part 2
Joint Symposium NW 13 and NW 30 continued from 13 SES 14 B JS
Contribution
This symposium is organised by the scientific research network ‘Public Pedagogy and Sustainability Challenges’. The network brings together educational theorists, sustainability education researchers, political scientists and researchers in the field of sustainability transition governance from Belgium, Sweden, Denmark, Poland, Ireland and South-Africa. They share an interest in the relation between education and societal transformation and want to deepen and widen the understanding of the public role of education in the face of sustainability challenges through interdisciplinary research collaboration. The aim of the network is to progress theory development and empirical research on public pedagogy with a focus on sustainability challenges and to address questions such as: How can education play a democratic role in addressing sustainability challenges? What are vital conditions or obstacles to make this possible? What does this imply for designing sustainability education practices? What are the theoretical, methodological and empirical implications of researching sustainability education as public pedagogy?
Working with these questions, three important considerations are taken into account: 1) Sustainability challenges are severe and urgently require radical action (e.g. IPCC, 2018); 2) Sustainability challenges can often be characterised as ethical and political challenges for which no clear-cut, uncontested solutions exist (e.g. Ashley, 2005; Van Poeck, Östman & Öhman, forthcoming) and 3) Education should not be reduced to an instrument to solve societal problems (e.g. Biesta, 2006; Säfström, 2011; Todd, 2011; Masschelein & Simons, 2013). The tension between these three assumptions bring about interesting issues for further conceptualising public pedagogy in the context of sustainability challenges. It raises questions as to what constitutes ‘the public’ in the face of sustainability issues, for instance, or what characterises public pedagogy as ‘pedagogy’ – and not, for example, communication or activism. The main challenge seems to be how to relate the key concepts ‘public’, ‘pedagogy’ and ‘sustainability’.
This symposium aims to progress the understanding of public pedagogy in the face of sustainability challenges by addressing key research challenges identified in this research network: the need for further conceptual clarification on the relationship between public pedagogy and sustainability issues, the need for empirical research on the topic and the need for interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary dialogue and collaboration. It is a symposium in two parts. This second part gathers contributions from Belgium, Sweden, Ireland and Denmark. Masschelein and Simons engage in a search for an alternative for the functionalist understanding of education as a defined practice – defined by what one knows and hence indicating what has to be learned – which is reflected, for example, in the UNESCO-document “Learning Cities and SDG’s”. They discuss concrete student work in various cities and draw on a text of Stengers to conceptualise university pedagogy as undefined study work. Bergdahl and Langmann take inspiration from the work of Arendt, Haraway and Todd to develop an educational language on sustainability challenges that takes the existential conditions of our living together on a damaged planet seriously. Lysgaard, Bengtsson and Säfström focus on what they call ‘the inherent excess of education’ to discuss how education always delivers something different than expected. Their paper rethinks education in order to forefront and grasp this inherent excess and how this relates directly to the inherent excess of sustainability issues.
References
Ashley M. 2005. Tensions between indoctrination and the development of judgement: the case against early closure. Environmental Education Research 11(2), 187–197. Biesta, G. 2006. Beyond learning. Democratic education for a human future. Boulder: Paradigm. IPCC 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Masschelein, J. & Simons, M. 2013. In defence of the school. A public issue. Leuven: E-ducation, Culture & Society Publishers. Säfström, C.A. 2011. Rethinking Emancipation, Rethinking Education. Studies in Philosophy & Education 30(2), 199–209. Todd, S. 2011. Educating Beyond Cultural Diversity: Redrawing the Boundaries of a Democratic Plurality. Studies in Philosophy & Education 30, 101–111. Van Poeck, K., Östman, L. & Öhman, J. (in press) Sustainable Development Teaching: Ethical and Political Challenges. London: Routledge.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.