Session Information
07 SES 12 A, Analysis of Co-Construction Processes in the Professionalization of Educators and Teachers for Migration Societies.
Paper Session
Contribution
The Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research (MIUR) reported that, based on the 2017-2018 academic year data, there are almost 660,520 students with non-Italian citizenship across the elementary, middle, and high school levels. That is 9.4% of the total school population (MUIR, 2020). The presence of these pupils, 63% of whom were born in Italy to non-Italian parents, requires new teaching, organizational methods, and policy in the Italian education system with an eye towards critical inclusion.
Nevertheless, despite a universal school system intended to bridge students with non-Italian citizenship, their families, and their communities (Colombo, Santagati, 2014), schools manage to perpetuate the same exclusionary systems intended to be prevented by these laws. Whether through geographic location, educational attainment, or school infrastructures, segregation leading to intercultural inequalities manifests.
Until recently, exact data on the specific student demographics, student outcomes, school choice, and school resources broken down within geographies were unavailable for public review. Thus, the connections between policy and practice have been speculative, qualitative, and anecdotal. For example, previous studies of the educational experiences of students with non-Italian citizenship have explored questions of the system's capacity to engage with changing demographics, investigating the wide gap between Italian and non-Italian students educational outcomes (Istat, 2016; Ravecca, 2009), professional achievements (Giancola, Salmieri, 2018), or by examining social connections and feelings of belonging of students with a migratory background (Galantino, 2019).
This study seeks to review and further investigate schools' demographic makeup in Italy, with a specific deep dive into schools in the city of Padova, and using the cases of Bologna and Torino for comparison. This study compares publicly available information from several online databases on the MIUR website, focusing on elementary, middle, and high school. By combining the results of previous qualitative research involving ethnographic participant observation with quantitative data analysis, we seek to understand the quality of educational services provided to students with non-Italian citizenship, the current state of students' trajectories, and the educational outcomes of students with non-Italian citizenship in the Italian school system.
Method
We will compare information from several publicly available databases on the MIUR website, focusing on elementary, middle, and high schools. The databases can be grouped into four categories:
Schools’ general information, including region, province, and address that we will use to map geolocalization and to create groups by grade or specialization
Data on the number of students with or without Italian citizenship status for each school
Data on schools based on the “Sistema Nazionale di Valutazione,” composed of self-assessments in ten categories related to the quality of services offered by each school
Data on school infrastructures, including quality of the contextual environment, accessibility measures, availability of transportation options, etc
Since the “Circolare Ministeriale n. 2, 8 Gennaio 2010”, the distribution of non-Italian citizenship students should be limited to a maximum of 30% of the student population for each school complex. Based on these values, we split the schools into five groups. Given n as the % of students of non-Italian citizenship:
Group 1: n<2%
Group 2: 2%
Expected Outcomes
A preliminary overview of the data shows three key results. First, regarding the general state of the distribution of non-Italian citizenship students in schools, there are too many schools in groups 1 and 5. We discovered that non-Italian citizenship students prefer certain high school specializations (mostly technical and professional development), that their drop-out rate is higher, and that they are less likely to attend private schools. Results of schools’ self-assessment evaluations seem like reliable markers of distinguishing the groups. Notably, schools in group 5, whose population of non-Italian citizenship students exceeded the limit posed by law, tended to score lower in all fields except for the quality of their DE&I-related practices. The data available on the schools’ infrastructures, albeit promising in theory, turned out to not be statistically meaningful due to significant absences of reports from many schools, leaving the datasets too incomplete to perform an analysis. Secondly, regarding the schools’ geolocalization, observations at the State level tend to replicate (with additional, valuable details) the results published by the MIUR in their 2017-2018 report. However, zooming locally reveals complex relations between the schools’ location and the urban and suburban environments. These results demonstrate how social factors, urban planning, and transportation contribute to students’ de-facto segregation based on citizenship. Lastly, the analysis conducted raises additional questions and concerns left unanswerable due to faulty and incomplete data. In particular, a better level of granularity could be achieved if we had additional information on the citizenship status of the parents of all students, their household income, and years of residence in Italy. The data collection methodology also raises questions about which other indicators could have been collected alongside the citizenship status (like ethnicity, gender beyond binary terms, disability).
References
Borromini, C., De Sanctis, G., Notiziario Stranieri, Gli alunni con cittadinanza non italiana, anno scolastico 2017/2018, Gestione Patrimonio Informativo e Statistica, MIUR, published July 2019 Colombo, M., Santagati, M. (2014), Nelle scuole plurali. Misure di integrazione degli alunni stranieri, Milan: Franco Angeli. Elia, J. (2014), «Le seconde generazioni di immigrati a scuola. Integrazione sìo integrazione no?», Education et sociétés plurilingues , 36, pp. 77-91. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Galantino, M. G. (2019). ‘I’m Italian, and I’m other.’ Citizenship in the Making among Second Generation High School Students in Rome. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of the Journal Scuola Democratica EDUCATION AND POST-DEMOCRACY VOLUME I Politics, Citizenship, Diversity, and Inclusion. ISTAT (2016), L’integrazione scolastica e sociale delle seconde generazioni– Anno 2015 , Rome: ISTAT Lalla, M. (2010). School insertion of foreign students of first and second generation in Italy. Department of Economics. Morales, A. and Hanson, W. E. (2005). Language brokering: an integrative review of the literature. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27, (4), 471 - 503. Ravecca, A. (2009), Studiare nonostante. Capitale sociale e successo scolastico degli studenti immigrati nella scuola superiore , Milan: Franco Angeli. The datasets used for this project can be accessed on the MIUR website (last visited: 01/29/2021) https://dati.istruzione.it/opendata/opendata/catalogo/#Scuola.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.