22 SES 03 B., Paper Session
The teaching-only academic position is a comparatively newly emerging phenomenon in higher education field. It has been studied by scholars in different context mainly including the UK (e.g. Tierney, 2016; Nyamapfene, 2018), Canada (e.g. Vajoczki et al., 2011; Wormald, 2013), and Australia (e.g.Probert and Sachs, 2015; Flavell, et al., 2018) from different perspectives including job security (e.g. Kurbatova and Donova, 2019), academic role and identity (e.g. Macfarlane 2011; Locke 2012; Nyamapfene, 2018), and scholarship of teaching and learning (e.g. Brew and Ginns, 2008; Carter and Brockerhoff-MacDonald, 2011; Mathison, 2015; Flecknoe et al., 2017).
Although this type of academic career path is now more widely applied in the institutions, the definition, attitude, reason and approach of creating such position are very different in terms of national context (Nyamapfene, 2018) and institutional culture (Flavell, et al., 2018). Since it is a relatively recent area of research, it is limited in both theoretical and empirical studies. Moreover, there are very few studies on the influence of the construction of this position on teaching and research nexus in higher education.
Teaching and research nexus has attracted more attention in higher education as it is widely accepted that both are fundamental to university (Coate, Barnett and Williams, 2001; Brew, 2003; Jenkins and Healey, 2005; Crow, 2010). It can be investigated from different level and perspective including undergraduate (e.g. Elsen, et al., 2009) or graduate (e.g. Lindsay, Breen and Jenkins, 2002); management perspective (e.g.Taylor, 2007), academics’ perspective (e.g. Roberson, 2007) or student’s perspective (e.g. Lindsay, Breen and Jenkins, 2002); and the tangible connection, the intangible connection or the global connection (Neumann, 1992). To better understand the teaching and research nexus is certainly beneficial in sustainably developing higher education (Taylor, 2007; Stappenbelt, 2013).
Therefore, this study will focus on the influence of creating and developing the teaching-only career path on teaching and research nexus at the undergraduate level in the public research-intensive university from a global scope including case studies in China, the UK, and Canada to provide both theoretical and empirical evidence. The analytical framework is constructed with the theory and concept of organisational analysis (Ancona et al., 2005) and academic identity (Billot, 2010) to emphasize both institutional and individual perception on such career development and its influence on teaching and research nexus.
The research method includes documentary analysis (university strategy on developing teaching-only position) and interview (teaching-only position academics and teaching and research position academics). The data will be analysed with the thematic analysis approach (Braun and Clarke, 2006).
The findings illustrate that although the position of teaching-only academics is all unlisted in three institutions, the reason and approach are diverse. Moreover, the institutional culture and individual’s attitude towards their role and identity of being a teaching-only academics are differently constructed and perceived, therefore leads to diverse influences on teaching and research nexus from the pedagogical and institutional perspective.
-Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. -Brew, A., & Ginns, P. (2008). The relationship between engagement in the scholarship of teaching and learning and students’ course experiences. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 535–545. - Crow, M. M. (2010). Organizing teaching and research to address the grand challenges of sustainable development. BioScience, 60(7), 488-489. -Elsen, M., Visser‐Wijnveen, G. J., Van der Rijst, R. M., & Van Driel, J. H. (2009). How to strengthen the connection between research and teaching in undergraduate university education. Higher Education Quarterly, 63(1), 64-85. -Flavell, H., Roberts, L., Fyfe, G., & Broughton, M. (2018). Shifting goal posts: the impact of academic workforce reshaping and the introduction of teaching academic roles on the scholarship of teaching and learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(2), 179-194. -Kurbatova, M. V., & Donova, I. V. (2019). Effective contract in higher education: some results of project implementation. Journal of Institutional Studies, 11(2), 122-145. -Lindsay, R., Breen, R., & Jenkins, A. (2002). Academic research and teaching quality: The views of undergraduate and postgraduate students. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 309-327. -Locke, W. (2012). "The dislocation of teaching and research and the reconfiguring of academic work." London Review of Education, 10(3), 261-274 -Macfarlane, B. (2011). "The Morphing of Academic Practice: Unbundling and the Rise of the Para‐academic." Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), 59-73. -Mathison, K. (2015). Effects of the performance management context on Australian academics’ engagement with the scholarship of teaching and learning: A pilot study. Australian Educational Researcher, 42(1), 97–116. -Neumann, R. (1992). Perceptions of the teaching-research nexus: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 23(2), 159-171. -Nyamapfene, A. Z. (2018). Teaching-only Academics in a Research Intensive University: From an undesirable to a desirable academic identity. -Probert, B., & Sachs, J. (2015). The rise of teaching focused academics in universities. International Journal of Chinese Education, 4(1), 48–67. -Stappenbelt, B. (2013). The effectiveness of the teaching–research nexus in facilitating student learning. Engineering Education, 8(1), 111-121. -Taylor, J. (2007). The teaching: research nexus: a model for institutional management. Higher Education, 54(6), 867-884. -Tierney, A. M. (2016). 'More than just a Teaching Fellow': the impact of REF and implications of TEF on life science Teaching-Focused Academics in UK HEIs -Vajoczki, S., Fenton, N., Menard, K., & Pollon, D. (2011). Teaching-stream faculty in Ontario universities. Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario. -Wormald, M. (2013). Emergence of the Canadian research university. College Quarterly, 16(3), n3.
00. Central Events (Keynotes, EERA-Panel, EERJ Round Table, Invited Sessions)
Network 1. Continuing Professional Development: Learning for Individuals, Leaders, and Organisations
Network 2. Vocational Education and Training (VETNET)
Network 3. Curriculum Innovation
Network 4. Inclusive Education
Network 5. Children and Youth at Risk and Urban Education
Network 6. Open Learning: Media, Environments and Cultures
Network 7. Social Justice and Intercultural Education
Network 8. Research on Health Education
Network 9. Assessment, Evaluation, Testing and Measurement
Network 10. Teacher Education Research
Network 11. Educational Effectiveness and Quality Assurance
Network 12. LISnet - Library and Information Science Network
Network 13. Philosophy of Education
Network 14. Communities, Families and Schooling in Educational Research
Network 15. Research Partnerships in Education
Network 16. ICT in Education and Training
Network 17. Histories of Education
Network 18. Research in Sport Pedagogy
Network 19. Ethnography
Network 20. Research in Innovative Intercultural Learning Environments
Network 22. Research in Higher Education
Network 23. Policy Studies and Politics of Education
Network 24. Mathematics Education Research
Network 25. Research on Children's Rights in Education
Network 26. Educational Leadership
Network 27. Didactics – Learning and Teaching
The programme is updated regularly (each day in the morning)
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.