Session Information
04 SES 11 B, Outcomes of Inclusive Education: Investigating Students’ Social Inclusion, Emotional Inclusion and Academic Self-Concept
Symposium
Contribution
The study includes a sample of children in 5th-10th grade with a formal diagnosis of physical disability (N=248). The population is characterized by a high risk of school dropout and low rates of social participation (Finnvold, 2018). About half of the target population have special educational needs (SEN), and display an extensive diversity in terms of parental background, school placement, need for assistance and functional ability. We examine the consequences of this variety on three outcome variables designed to capture the children’s own perceptions: i) overall school-wellbeing/emotional inclusion, ii) social inclusion, and iii) academic self-concept. The outcome measures are based on a Norwegian translation of the Perception of Inclusion Questionnarie (Zurbriggen et al., 2019, Venetz et al. 2015). The associations between background variables and outcomes was relatively weak regarding emotional well-being, moderate for social inclusion and relatively strong for academic inclusion. Preliminary findings from multivariate analyses includes that children attending regular schools but spending more than half the time outside of ordinary classroom education, had markedly lower scores on both social inclusion and academic self-concept. Further, that children with an immigrant background was less likely to feel emotionally and socially included, and that girls had relatively low scores on social inclusion. Children of mothers with high scores on social capital (Ellison et al., 2007) tended to report more positive experiences. Our findings highlight a significantly lower risk of negative academic self-concept among children of mothers that had completed university level education, suggesting that the social gradients in educational attainment previously observed in Norway (Andersen & Hansen, 2012) may have their origins early in children’s lives. Although several factors influenced the children’s self-perception of inclusion, the degree of placement in ordinary school settings was the most significant. The negative influence must be acknowledged and weighted against the benefits when discussing further continuation of segregation practices.
References
Andersen, P. L., & Hansen M. N. (2012). "Class and cultural capital—The case of class inequality in educational performance." European sociological review, 28(5), 607-621. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). "The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites." Journal of computer-mediated communication, 12(4),1143-1168. Finnvold, J. E. (2018). "School segregation and social participation: the case of Norwegian children with physical disabilities." European Journal of Special Needs Education, 33(2), 187-204. Venetz, M., Zurbriggen, C. L. A., Eckhart, M., Schwab, S., & Hessels, M. G. P. (2015). The perceptions of inclusion questionnaire (PIQ). Retrieved from https://piqinfo.ch/ Zurbriggen, C. L. A., Venetz, M., Schwab, S., & Hessels, M. G. P. (2019). A psychometric analysis of the student version of the Perceptions of Inclusion Questionnaire (PIQ). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(5), 641–649. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000443
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.