Session Information
28 SES 15 A, Transforming Learning through Automated Technologies; Transforming Automated Technologies through Learning
Symposium
Contribution
Since the beginning of the 21th century, security-oriented policy agendas have become the modus operandi in Western societies (Beck, 2008), which try to save their belief in the future paradoxically through imagining that future as an ongoing potential danger zone (Reinhard, forthcoming). The schooling sector is no exception to this development, as the global rise of so-called early warning systems clearly indicates. Such systems equally operate through ongoing ‘dangerization’, which is the imagination of learning mainly through categories of menace and adverse probabilities. In 2005, all 50 US governors agreed to a common calculation of high school graduation rates. Five years later, the federal government required the US States to include longitudinal data to that calculation, which ‘follow’ individual students from early childhood into the workforce (Balfanz et al., 2009). Over the past decade, pressure increased to use that data to install early warning systems, mainly aiming to reduce the number of high school dropouts. Promotors of such systems hereby frequently pointed to research which claimed that ‘at-risk students’ could (easily) be identified through indicators such as poor attendance, behavior, course performance, or negative experiences at school (Ryan, 2011). This paper analyses documents as well as scientific literature on the use of early warning systems in US schooling, focusing in particular on ‘socio-technical imaginaries’ (Castoriadis, 1987; Jasanoff & Kim, 2015; Williamson, 2017), that is imaginations about the future of schooling evoked by the utilization of predictive early warning analytics. As the analysis shows, while the material under study – and, thus, the present discourse on early warning systems – is motivated by the socio-technical imaginary of preventing high school dropouts on the basis of data-driven personalized targeting, potential paradoxes have only scarcely been discussed. One example is the emergence of self-fulfilling prophecies, such as the potential reinforcement of discouraging school experiences through the personalization of risks and, followingly, internalization of possible failure on the part of students, which may ultimately increase the very risk factor of discouraging school experiences that it strives to overcome. This paper therefore points to an enigmatic imbalance in the debate on early warning systems, calling for more critical observations of the amalgamation of security-oriented policy agendas and the socio-technical imaginary of preventing high school dropouts.
References
Castoriadis, C. (1987). The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge: MIT Press. Balfanz, R. et al. (2010). Building a Grad Nation: Progress and Challenge in Ending the High School Dropout Epidemic. Civic Enterprises. Beck, U. (2008). World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press. Jasanoff, S. & Kim, S.-H. (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity. Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Reinhard, M. (forthcoming). Speculation. A Conceptual Analysis in the Aftermath of the Financial Crisis of 2007, Basel III, and the Future. In: Review of Economic Philosophy. Ryan, M. (2011). Early Warning Indicator Systems. Denver: Education Commission of the States. Williamson, B. (2017). Big Data in Education. The Digital Future of Learning, Policy and Practice. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.