Session Information
23 SES 02 A, New Policy Instruments for Education and Training in Europe: Generating Productive Tensions (Part I)
Symposium Part I, to be continued in 23 SES 03 A
Contribution
The emergence of European educational structures has received considerable attention in the last decades in the education policy literature, such as the case of the construction of the European Education Area (Nóvoa & Lawn, 2002), the European Higher Education Area (Powell, Bernhard & Graf, 2012), or policies and programmes to foster mobility (Yuval & Yemini, 2017). Yet considerably less attention has been paid to how the funding of policy instruments for the European Research Area (see Beerkens, 2008; Nedeva & Wedlin, 2015) has shaped European educational research. The European Union Framework Programme (EUFP) is the most institutionalised form of supranational thematic programming in the world and the centrepiece of European Union research policy (1984-2020). Since 1994, the EUFP has also funded collaborative research projects in the social sciences. Surprisingly, little attention has been paid to its genesis, development, and effects in shaping the development of European science, especially examined by discipline or multidisciplinary fields. The EUFP is thus analysed here through an instruments-as-institutions (Lascoumes & Le Galès, 2007, 2012) approach that conceptualises the EUFP as an institution (Scott, 2013). Content analysis of the official documents of each funding cycle (n=5) and a sample of European educational research projects (n=122) were analysed in conducting this research. The results show incremental ideational change of the EUFP’s guiding ideas: from knowledge as an instrument to knowledge as a resource; within-the-EU to outside-the-EU internationalisation; and cooperation to an integration rationale of Europeanisation from the EUFP4 and EUFP5 (1994-2002) to the EUFP6 onwards (2002-2020). European educational research contents are shaped by such representations of what is expected of European research. If the policy instrument steers European educational research, ideas more than regulatory features significantly – though incrementally – change the direction of European science.
References
Beerkens, E. (2008). The emergence and institutionalisation of the European Higher Education and Research Area. European Journal of Education, 43(4), 407-425. Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments – From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1-21. Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2012). Sociologie de l’action publique (2nd ed.). Paris, France: Armand Colin. Nedeva, M., & Wedlin, L. (2015). From ‘science in Europe’ to ‘European science’. In L. Wedlin & M. Neveda (eds.), Towards European science: Dynamics and policy of an evolving European research space (pp. 12-36). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Nóvoa, A., & Lawn, M. (2002). Fabricating Europe – The formation of an education space. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Powell, J. J. W., Bernhard, N., & Graf, L. (2012). The emergent European model in skill formation: Comparing higher education and vocational training in the Bologna and Copenhagen processes. Sociology of Education, 85(3), 240-258. Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Yuval, D. & Yemini, M. (2017). Mobility as a continuum: European commission mobility policies for schools and higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 32(2), 198-210.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.