Session Information
23 SES 03 B, Transnationalizing Educational Politics and the Political of Education: Understanding New Educational Governance as Epistemological Politics
Symposium
Contribution
As school autonomy, a central tenet of neoliberal education reform, increases, governments rely on the hard governance technologies of school inspections and student testing and the soft governance provision of information and advice to ensure their manifesto commitments on schools are met. This paper explores the interplay between the different education knowledge traditions underpinning such governance approaches, how these interact with the existing education knowledge of school leaders, managers and teachers, and the effect of this on students. I focus on England and Germany, two countries that differ considerably in the nature and extent of hard governance. Mathematics lessons are observed in two comprehensive and two selective schools in each country, and school leaders, managers and teachers are interviewed. Using a framework based in the work of Bernstein, I examine the influence of competing education knowledge traditions on mathematics teaching and the variance in how students think about mathematics that results. I thereby compare the process by which emerging and established market conditions in schools privilege some education knowledge traditions and thereby shape mathematics teaching and student experiences. Alongside market reforms in England such as the introduction of teacher accountability measures linked to student tests in 1990 and regular school inspections in 1992, arguments that educational research should attend more to gathering evidence of what works in what circumstances for use by teachers flourished (Hargreaves, 1996a, 1996b). Since then, methodologically complex research with little theorisation has dominated, with a few exceptions, such as cognitive psychology, regarded as neutral and trustworthy because they make use of the methods of science. Supporting teachers in using external research evidence to develop initiatives for tackling specific school issues, and internal evidence from student assessments and teaching observations to improve the focus and quality of teaching became a public policy focus. As such, the marginalisation of critical stances represents a de-politicisation of both educational research and practice. Germany remains less polarised although this is changing. An academic knowledge tradition of hermeneutic educational thought has traditionally dominated, where professionalism has remained relatively autonomous, emphasising reflective decision-making, but the use of test data to discern ‘what works’, evidence-based practice is increasingly valued (Schriewer, 2017).
References
Bernstein, B. (1990) The structure of pedagogic discourse, London, RoutledgeFalmer. Bernstein, B. (1999) Vertical and horizontal discourse: an essay, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157-173. Bottery, M. (1996) The challenge to professionals from the New Public Management: implications for the teaching profession, Oxford Review of Education, 22, 179–197. Furlong, J. & Whitty, G. (2017) Knowledge traditions in the study of Education, in: G. Whitty, & J. Furlong, (Eds) Knowledge and the Study of Education: an international comparison, Oxford, Symposium Books, 13-57. Hargreaves, D. (1996a) Educational research and evidence-based educational practice: A response to critics, Research Intelligence, 58, 12–16. Hargreaves, D. (1996b) Teaching as a research-based profession: possibilities and prospects. Teacher Training Agency Annual Lecture, London, Available at: https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/TTA%20Hargreaves%20lecture.pdf [Accessed 27th January 2020]. Moos, L. (2009) Hard and soft governance: the journey from transnational agencies to school leadership, European Educational Research Journal, 8(3), 397-406. Schriewer, J. (2017) Between the philosophy of self-cultivation and empirical research: educational studies in Germany, in: G. Whitty, & J. Furlong, (Eds) Knowledge and the Study of Education: an international comparison, Oxford, Symposium Books, 75-99. Singh, P. (2017) Pedagogic governance: theorising with/after Bernstein, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(2), 144-163.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.