Session Information
26 SES 08 B, School Leadership Development: Emerging Trends and Topics (Part 1)
Paper Session to be continued in 26 SES 14 B
Contribution
The professionalization of school leaders is frequently developed and debated all over the world. In recent decades, almost all OECD countries and EU member states have invested massively in school leader professional development and training, and this tendency can be seen worldwide (Huber, 2010). One important reason for these investments is the growing recognition of school leaders as important for the core practices of teaching and learning in schools (Bøje & Frederiksen 2019). School leaders are increasingly perceived as key agents for the quality of teaching and learning, teacher professional development but also for improvement and capacity building in schools (Rönnström, 2021).
Although the meaning of ‘professional’ and ‘professionalization’ vary between a plurality of contexts and school leadership connoisseurs, there are some converging trends in recent developments and debates. Some use the term ‘professional’ mainly as an indicator of being successful or good at one’s job. This way of using the term is reflected in research explicating the meaning of successful or effective school leadership (See Drysdale & Gurr, 2017; Hallinger, 2011; Leithwood, 2021; Leithwood et al, 2004; Robinson et al, 2009). Others use the term to indicate membership a of group of educational practitioners or a learning community, or as being a co-creator of communities of practitioners within or linked to schools (See Zachrisson and Johansson, 2010; Chirichello, 2010). There are also researchers who use the term in order to signify membership in qualified and socially closed communities drawn from conditions developed in the sociology of professions. The latter researchers commonly argue that school leaders run the risk of de-professionalization despite massive investments in professional development and training (Bøje & Frederiksen 2019).
The urgency of present time school leader professional development investments is not primarily linked to professionalization in the common or traditional senses; rather, it´s linked to the increasing globalization, economization, rationalization and re-organization of the public sector in general and the education sector in particular (Pashiardis and Brauckman, 2019; Ringarp and Rönnström, 2021; Hood, 1995). In our hyper modern world, changing landscapes of professionalization and professions are emerging and they are growing in importance, and they are important to questions of who educators are and who they are becoming. We can no longer fully grasp recent and ongoing professionalization movements by focusing on skills, capabilities, professional membership or criteria drawn from standard textbooks in the sociology of the professions. There is a need for new frameworks and alternative ways of conceptualizing the professionalization of school leaders in order to understand the scope, character and urgency of school leader professional development and training in present time.
In this paper, we will discuss and analyze the professionalization of school leaders as taking place within a changing landscape of professionalization due to recent globalization, economization, rationalization and organization in the education sector. We will illuminate an ongoing global movement and converging strategies among many European nations with regard to the professionalization of school leaders, and we will discuss their scope, character and urgency. We will in depth discuss recent school leader professional development and training in Sweden as an example of the changing landscape of professionalization. Finally, we will argue that the school leader profession is growing into an organizational profession in Sweden and elsewhere (Evetts, 2011; Ringarp and Rönnström, 2021). This is rarely recognized in recent debates and research on school leader professional development. Organizational professionalization differs from occupational professionalization (as the latter is explicated within the sociology of the professions), and this development has consequences for the knowledge-base, training and autonomy of school leaders and how they are expected to relate to other professionals in schools.
Method
This study departs from recent development in the sociology of professions and studies in organizational professionalization and professions (Evetts, 2011; Ringarp and Rönnström, 2021). In the paper, we critically examine political, economic, organizational and professional motives for school leader professional development in Sweden and in the OECD countries. We will examine and analyse OECD documents describing and discussing school leader professional development strategies in different countries in the 21st century. We will elaborate further on the Swedish case and analyse national policy for school leaders and school leader professional development. We will examine the Swedish national school leadership training program (NSLP) which is mandatory for all principals in Swedish preschools and schools, and we will examine how school leader unions and associations respond to recent strategies for school leader professionalization in Sweden. We have collected, examined and analysed data and documents from different sources. First, we have analysed OECD documents 2000-2022 focusing on the work of school leaders, professional development and national policy. Second, we have studied policy documents, laws, regulations and commissions relevant the school leader profession in Sweden 2000-2022. Third, we have followed the National Agency of Education and their governance of the NSLP from 2009-2022 (Goal documents, yearbooks, annual reports, conference invitations, evaluations and other documents). Fourth, we also follow the institutionalization of the NSLP at different universities selected as providers of the NSLP. We base our research on data and documents from all selected universities with regard to their program design, annual reports, study guides and course material for the period 2009-2022. All data and documentation are analysed with an analytical framework drawn from recent work on the changing landscapes of professionalization within the sociology of professions and the emergence of organizational professions (Evetts, 2011).
Expected Outcomes
This study departs from recent development in the sociology of professions and studies in organizational professionalization and professions (Evetts, 2011; Ringarp and Rönnström, 2021). In the paper, we critically examine political, economic, organizational and professional motives for school leader professional development in Sweden and in the OECD countries. We will examine and analyse OECD documents describing and discussing school leader professional development strategies in different countries in the 21st century. We will elaborate further on the Swedish case and analyse national policy for school leaders and school leader professional development. We will examine the Swedish national school leadership training program (NSLP) which is mandatory for all principals in Swedish preschools and schools, and we will examine how school leader unions and associations respond to recent strategies for school leader professionalization in Sweden. We have collected, examined and analysed data and documents from different sources. First, we have analysed OECD documents 2000-2022 focusing on the work of school leaders, professional development and national policy. Second, we have studied policy documents, laws, regulations and commissions relevant the school leader profession in Sweden 2000-2022. Third, we have followed the National Agency of Education and their governance of the NSLP from 2009-2022 (Goal documents, yearbooks, annual reports, conference invitations, evaluations and other documents). Fourth, we also follow the institutionalization of the NSLP at different universities selected as providers of the NSLP. We base our research on data and documents from all selected universities with regard to their program design, annual reports, study guides and course material for the period 2009-2022. All data and documentation are analysed with an analytical framework drawn from recent work on the changing landscapes of professionalization within the sociology of professions and the emergence of organizational professions (Evetts, 2011).
References
Bøje, J. D. and Frederiksen, L. F. (2019). Leaders of the professional and professional leaders. School leaders making sense of themselves and their jobs. In: International Journal of Leadership in Education. Chirichello, M. (2010). The principal as educational leader: What makes the difference? In Huber, S. G. (Ed.), School leadership- International perspectives. London: Springer. Drysdale, L. & Gurr, D. (2017). Leadership in Uncertain Times. In: International Studies in Educational Administration, 45(2). Evetts, J. (2011). A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. In: Current Sociology 59(4). Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. In. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2). Hood, C. (1995) The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. In: Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2-3). Huber, S. (2010). Preparing School Leaders – International Approaches in Leadership Development. In: Huber, S. (Ed.), School leadership- International perspectives. London: Springer. Leithwood, (2021). A Review of Evidence about Equitable School Leadership. In: Educ. Sci. 11(377). Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Andersson, S. & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation. Parshiardis, P. and Bruckmann, S. (2019). New Public Management in Education: A coll for the Eduprenieurial Leder? In: Ledership and Policy in Schools, 18(3). Ringarp, J. and Rönnström, N. (2021). Är rektorsyrkets en yrkesprofession eller en organisationsprofession, och vad gör det för skillnad? In: Ahlström, B., Berg, G., Lindqvist Håkansson, M. and Sundh, F. (eds.), Att jobba som rektor. Om rektorer som professionella yrkesutövare (pp. 79-90). Lund: Studentlitteratur. Robinson, V., Hohepa, M. and Lloyd, C. (2009). School Leadership and Student Outcomes: Identifying What Works and Why Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES], New Zealand Ministry of Education. Rönnström, N. (2021) Leadership Capacity for Change and Improvement. In: Peters, M. (Ed.) The Encyclopedia of Teacher Education. Springer Verlag. Zachrisson, E., Johansson, O. (2010). Educational Leadership for Democracy and Social Justice. In: Huber, S. (eds) School Leadership - International Perspectives. Studies in Educational Leadership. Dordrecht: Springer
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.