Session Information
22 SES 14 A JS, What Can West European Higher Education Learn from Central and Eastern Europe
Joint Symposium NW 22 and NW 23
Contribution
A cursory glance over education scholarship over the past 30 years, reveals a peculiar distinction. Out of all the articles available in the ERIC (Education Resource Information Center) database, published between 1990 and 2020, 562 articles bear some variation of the moniker ‘Central and Eastern Europe’ in the title. Curiously, ‘Western Europe’ appears in 71 articles, most of them (37) dating back to the period from 1990 to 2000. This means that the former is used almost 8 times as often as the latter. Such exceptional grouping together of a significant part of continental Europe is rarely questioned, though it merits a deeper discussion (Nygård & Strang, 2017). While on the surface it may seem a geographical distinction, the precise countries and their groups which are referred to as such in publications differ greatly. Moreover, nearly none of such grouping is observed for other parts of Europe. Whenever the title of an article refers to ‘Europe’, it is reasonable to expect that the research presented comes from the western part of the continent, however, if it comes from the central or eastern part (geographically speaking), ‘Europe’ usually needs a qualifier. There are several practical reasons for this practice, for example, in light of international publishing requirements, it is now often used by scholars based in the region as it helps to expand readership and improve one’s chances of publication, especially when research in smaller countries of the region is concerned. Yet, we believe that it tends to epistemically lump together vastly different countries with different social contexts, histories and approaches to education (Dakowska, 2017). Moreover, it also poses Central and Eastern Europe as an ‘other’ inside of Europe wherein (Western) Europe is considered the norm and (Central and Eastern) Europe remains relevant to the extent it strives to reach that norm as it was expected to do during the transition period (Cerych, 1995). This paper endeavours to interrogate the early conception of the notion of Central and Eastern Europe by analysing the international scholarship in higher education research from 1990 to 2000. We aim to elucidate the emergence of Central and Eastern Europe as a research unit and critically interrogate its discursive construction as the ‘other’ in opposition with the dominant concept of ‘Europe’.
References
Cerych, L. (1995). Educational reforms in Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Education, 30(4), 423–435. Dakowska, D. (2017). Competitive universities? The impact of international and European trends on academic institutions in the ‘New Europe.’ European Educational Research Journal, 16(5), 588–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116688024 Nygård, S., & Strang, J. (2017). Conceptual universalization and the role of the peripheries. Contributions to the History of Concepts, 12(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2017.120105
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.