Being born with or acquiring a disability or chronic condition in early childhood influence the chances of completing an education in adulthood. We analyse changes in educational outcomes over two decades for six diagnostic groups, comparing them with a nationally representative sample. Our overarching questions are: to what extent do gaps in participation rates exist, and can we observe a narrowing in the gap in education participation for cohorts born between 1977 and 1995?
A child’s gender as well as parental education are influential predictors of educational outcomes. We address the intersection between diagnostic condition, gender and parental educational background on educational outcomes. Does parental background contribute more to the educational success of children with disabilities and chronic conditions? And to what extent can gaps in educational outcomes be accounted for by gender?
A characteristic of Norway as well as other western societies during the last decades is a general expansion in education, including tertiary education (Thompson 2019). In addition, since the late 1970s, inclusive education had been legally and politically mandated. The expansion involves resources, as well as time spent in school. From 1990 to 2008, the total teaching time in Norwegian schools increased drastically. A focus on “early effort” and reading, writing and arithmetic skills imply longer days in school. Norway also experienced a major growth in special education from the early 2000s. The share of children receiving special education increased from 2 percent in 2002 to 8 percent in 2008. The growth in special education in part reflect an overall heightened awareness of the situation of disabled children. Legislative efforts and acts, such as universal access to school-buildings and other measures, reveal intentions from central authorities to “level the playing field”.
In the period of investigation, medical and technical advances may enable individuals with specific diagnostic conditions to be in a better position to benefit from education. In the Curriculum from 1997, the deaf were for the first time given the right to education in sign language as their first language, and an increasing number of cochlear implants are in use in Norway. Better and more effective medication to control diabetes and asthma are now available, and new information technologies can assist children with sensory limitations. Use of social media and other digital platforms for educational purposes can counter the limitations of not being physically present.
However, other changes in the period may increase the risk of further marginalization within the educational system for children with disabilities and chronic conditions. In a meritocratic society, success in the educational system may have an increasing influence on the chances of success in adult life in terms of employment status, occupational attainment, and earnings. In a situation with heightened competition within the educational system, children with disabilities and chronic conditions may be increasingly at risk. A number of studies suggest that a process of social exclusion is going on, following placement in segregated school settings within ordinary schools as well as special schools (De Bruin 2020). Contrary to officially stated policy objectives in Norway, local municipalities and schools continue a practice of segregating children with outside of ordinary classroom education. In higher education, financial assistance intended to compensate for the constraints faced by students with disabilities have been also cut back.