Session Information
04 SES 08 C, Experiences of Women in Education
Paper Session
Contribution
Women’s empowerment may be gaining ground on a global stage (UN Sustainable Development Goal 5). However, notions of empowerment abound and are often poorly defined, misused, or even abused. Woman’s empowerment is often linked to education, however, much less is known about ‘how’ education empowers women (Mosedale, 2005) and indeed may disempower. Even with this knowledge, there is no singular woman’s experience or way to empower. The voices of neurodivergent woman have been marginalised in empowerment discourses, in a meaningful sense, as our literature review suggests the term is often misused when applied to woman with ADHD. This research also builds on an emergent body of evidence suggests that the experiences of woman and girls with ADHD is different to what is commonly associated with ADHD; because much of what is known is based on research with males. For example, when compared with males, females with ADHD appear to present differently, they are more likely to ‘suffer in silence’ and receive a diagnosis at a later age (Murry et al., 2019; Waite, 2007), they also present with higher rates of inattention, internalizing problems, or cooccurring difficulties (e.g., anxiety disorders eating disorders, and depression: Levy, Hay, Bennett, & McStephen, 2005; Quinn, 2008), and social impairments (Biederman et al., 2002; Gershon, 2002). They are less likely to present with externalising issues, conduct problems, or behaviour disorders (Quinn, 2005). There is recognition for the impact of culture (which has an impact on woman in terms of gender specifics roles and responsibilities) on ADHD characteristics, functional difficulties, self-identity, and well-being (Singh, 2011, 2014; Waite, 2010). This paper also builds on an emergent awareness that inclusive research should move away from trying to 'fix' deficits, and construct environments which are inclusive and empowering, and that such research should be done 'with' those directly affected, in this case, woman with ADHD.
Method
This participatory research project explored the journeys of woman with ADHD through education into employment to identify ‘empowerment enablers’. 13 women (27-41 years) from across Europe (Ireland, UK, Spain, Germany, Sweden, Belgium, and Romania) participated in an individual interview exploring their educational journeys through a life narrative approach. Women then participated in a focus group (N=11) further exploring experiences of empowerment enables in education and employment. Interviews and focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using Thematic Analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006). A co-construction workshop included participants and a wider group of women with ADHD (N= 15) to verify and unpack the themes.
Expected Outcomes
Three main themes were identified. First, ‘ADHD in woman and girls’, which focused on strengths and difficulties, including ADHD-related characteristics and how these were often at odds with demands or norms within their environment. Second, ‘opportunities for empowerment’ focus on the importance and the characteristics of empowering relationships, finding meaning and purpose in experience (particularly of disempowerment), using their strengths, and getting the right support. Third, ‘(dis)empowerment’ focuses on experiences of disempowerment, and how these can be changed to create opportunities for empowerment. The woman wanted to discuss their experienced of disempowerment as important parts of their educational journey. The woman spoke of real struggles beginning in secondary education, chronic social difficulties, and a lack of understanding of how ADHD manifests in females. We will also explore their experiences of being ‘put in a box’ in school, which they then struggled to get out of. We will consider the lasting effects of disempowerment; and whether these educational experience effect empowerment in adulthood.
References
Gershon, J. (2002). Gender differences in ADHD. The ADHD Report, 10(4), 8. Gershon, J., & Gershon, J. (2002). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in ADHD. Journal of attention disorders, 5(3), 143-154. Levy, F., Hay, D. A., Bennett, K. S., & McStephen, M. (2005). Gender differences in ADHD subtype comorbidity. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(4), 368-376. Mosedale, S. (2005). Assessing women's empowerment: towards a conceptual framework. Journal of international development, 17(2), 243-257. Murray, A. L., Booth, T., Eisner, M., Auyeung, B., Murray, G., & Ribeaud, D. (2019). Sex differences in ADHD trajectories across childhood and adolescence. Developmental science, 22(1), e12721. Quinn, P. O. (2005). Treating adolescent girls and women with ADHD: Gender‐Specific issues. Journal of clinical psychology, 61(5), 579-587. Quinn, P. O. (2008). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and its comorbidities in women and girls: an evolving picture. Current psychiatry reports, 10(5), 419-423. Singh, I. (2011). A disorder of anger and aggression: Children’s perspectives on attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the UK. Social science & medicine, 73(6), 889-896. Singh, I. (2014). Authenticity, values, and context in mental disorder: The case of children with ADHD. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 21(3), 237-240. Waite, R. (2007). Women and attention deficit disorders: A great burden overlooked. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 19(3), 116-125. Waite, R. (2010). Women with ADHD: It is an explanation, not the excuse du jour. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 46(3), 182-196.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.