Session Information
10 SES 02 C, Exploring Care and Support in Teacher Education
Paper Session
Contribution
Digital platforms in education have experienced a considerable rise of interest in many different types of studies about distance learning and teaching; studies on the impact on teachers (Klapprofth et al. 2020; Yao 2021; Stachteas, Stachteas 2020; Marek et al. 2021), educational and digital inequalities (Oliviera et al. 2021; Gillis, Krull 2020; Dudová 2021), but also teachers’ work conditions (Mouralová, Hejzlarová 2022; Pirro et al. 2021). The COVID-19 pandemic drew the attention of social researchers as it caused sudden and, in the European context, unprecedented measures of protection against it. The conditions of social life changed from day to day, and individuals, groups, organisations and institutions had to change. This includes how teachers used social networks and how they functioned in virtual environments. Yet, little attention has been paid to the role of digital platforms in providing space for self-support/self-help for teachers´ communities (see Mouralová, Hejzlarová 2022).
The paper aims to fill in the blind spot and describe the dynamics of one particular (but immensely popular) Facebook public group gathering teachers in the Czech Republic called Ucitele + (Teachers +) and analyze the topics raised there in the first phase of the pandemic, in the period 2/2020 - 6/2020, in order to answer the following research questions: What sort of issues did the teachers raise in the Facebook group? How can we understand the selection of the issues in terms of particular roles a virtual platform can play - i. e., peer support, self-help, empowerment, micropolitics? Answering the questions enriches the scholarship focusing on teachers´ needs and the ways of covering their needs, not just during the times of pandemic.
Social media use increased enormously all over the world during COVID-19 as people searched for ‘just-in-time’ news, information, social connections, and support in their daily lives (Greenhow et al. 2021). Teachers’ professional peer grouping was no exception. Teachers needed the support of one another during the unprecedented change in their teaching lives. This was not possible anymore in the space of school staff rooms. A more instant, open and comprehensive source was searched. The teachers reached out for teaching support in the online ‘teaching staff room’. Facebook public peer group for teachers Ucitelé + was established in 2017, a few years before COVID-19 spread, but enlarged enormously during it. The more people reached out and joined, the more valuable the network was. The group gained prominence and power during COVID-19 and created micro-politics that managed to put a force on the policymakers. I draw upon Greenhow et al. (2021, p 1451), who researched teachers’ tweets in the US and Canada during that time and who argue that during the COVID-19 pandemic, teachers reached to social media for personal “just-in-time” professional development like other times; however, the importance of the utility of teachers’ questioning discourse in emerging situations as is the COVID-19 is crucial.
In my paper, I show the research in the specific situation of the Czech Republic. The schools in Czechia are very decentralised and separated. There is no professional chamber to unite all schools and teachers, although there are many small professional social networks which have limited support. Town councils govern Czech primary and lower secondary schools (in the Czech Republic, one institution). Still, upper secondary schools are governed by a county, making connections and cooperation across the school levels even more difficult. Social media networking is a logical consequence of the lack of support and networking across schools in the Czech Republic.
Method
To address the above research questions, I use mixed design research, which is based on a qualitative approach with some partial quantitative elements. I obtained the data from the administrators of the Facebook group Ucitele+ who downloaded a dataset of entries in a particular Facebook public peer group for teachers, the download was for the period starting February 2020, during which the Czech schools were closed up to June 2020, when they were reopened and running in special after first phase’ mode. The created data was analysed focusing on entries issues, their frequency, the volume of the reactions on it, and their patterns. I also conducted semi-structured interviews with the five administrators of the group, tracing the dynamic of the group during the COVID-19 lockdown and its micropolitics. I used the methods of digital ethnography (Pink et al. 2016). Theoretically, I draw upon the concept of the micropolitics of educational change as in Blasé (1998) or Kalchtermans, Ballet (2002) and Švaříček (2009). I also build on the literature about the COVID-19 pandemic Klapprofth et al. (2020); Yao (2021); Stachteas, Stachteas 2020; Marek et al. (2021); Oliviera et al. (2021); Gillis, Krull (2020); Dudová (2021); Mouralová, Hejzlarová (2022); Pirro et al. (2021) and use of the internet as a source of teachers professional development Greenhow et al. (2021), Alwafi (2021) or Cavanaugh, DeWeese (2020).
Expected Outcomes
The research is still in progress, and final analyses are not available at present. However, the significant increase in membership and intensity of communication in the Facebook public group Ucitele + during the COVID-19 pandemic was clearly fulfilling an essential function of just-in-time answers (Greenhow et al. 2021) that the teachers needed and had not been saturated elsewhere. The preliminary analyses of the data revealed four categories of the entries in the group: 1) asking for help with a specific teaching task, asking for ideas, tips, and experiences of others; 2) sharing specific materials and tips, trying to help others; 3) responding to and dealing with school or higher politics, both personally and in a systemic/organized way; 4) psycho-hygiene - sharing difficulties, relieving oneself. The issue of responding to and dealing with school and higher politics is reviling micropolitics issued of the group. The other categories show the increasing need for just-in-time tools for the professional development of the teachers and school staff currently during the COVID-19 pandemic but perhaps more permanently as well.
References
Blase J. 1998. „The Micropolitics of Educational Change.“ Pp. 544-557 in International Handbook of Educational Change. Dordrecht: Springer. Dudová, R. (2021). Péče jako individuální odpovědnost a prohloubení ekonomického znevýhodnění sólo matek v pandemii covid-19. Gender a výzkum, 22(2), 110-138. Gillis, A., & Krull, L. M. (2020). covid19?> COVID-19 remote learning transition in spring 2020: class structures, student perceptions, and inequality in college courses. Teaching Sociology, 48(4), 283-299. Greenhow, C., Staudt Willet, K. B., & Galvin, S. (2021). Inquiring tweets want to know:# Edchat supports for# RemoteTeaching during COVID‐19. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1434-1454. Kelchtermans G., K. Ballet 2002. „The micropolitics of teacher induction. A narrative biographical study on teacher socialisation.“ Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (1): 105–120. Klapproth, F., Federkeil, L., Heinschke, F., & Jungmann, T. (2020). Teachers' Experiences of Stress and Their Coping Strategies during COVID-19 Induced Distance Teaching. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(4), 444-452. Marek, M. W., Chew, C. S., & Wu, W. C. V. (2021). Teacher experiences in converting classes to distance learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 19(1), 89-109. Mouralová, M., & Hejzlarová, E. M. (2022). Proč učitelky nechodí na ošetřovačku? Emoční strategie, mikropolitiky a sebepojetí učitelek s malými dětmi v době pandemie. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, 58(5), 477-507. Oliveira, G., Grenha Teixeira, J., Torres, A., & Morais, C. (2021). An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1357-1376. Pink, S. (2016). Digital ethnography. Innovative methods in media and communication research, 161-165. Pirro, F., Toscano, E., Di Nunzio, D., & Pedaci, M. (2022). When school ‘stayed home’. A sociology of work approach on the remote work of teachers during the lockdown for the COVID-19 pandemic: the case of Italy. International Review of Sociology, 1-12. Stachteas, P., & Stachteas, C. (2020). The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on secondary school teachers. Psychiatrike= Psychiatriki, 31(4), 293-301. Švaříček R. 2009. „Pomluvy jako mikropolitická strategie učitelů základní školy.“ Studia paedagogica 14 (1): 87-108 Yao, S., Li, D., Yohannes, A., & Song, H. (2021). Exploration for network distance teaching and resource sharing system for higher education in the epidemic situation of COVID-19. Procedia Computer Science, 183, 807-813.
Search the ECER Programme
- Search for keywords and phrases in "Text Search"
- Restrict in which part of the abstracts to search in "Where to search"
- Search for authors and in the respective field.
- For planning your conference attendance you may want to use the conference app, which will be issued some weeks before the conference
- If you are a session chair, best look up your chairing duties in the conference system (Conftool) or the app.